• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄对听觉词汇记忆检索过程中神经可辨别性和监测过程的影响。

Age Effects on Neural Discriminability and Monitoring Process During Memory Retrieval for Auditory Words.

作者信息

Shao Xuhao, Liu Wenzhi, Guo Ying, Zhu Bi

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jul 19;14:884993. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.884993. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2022.884993
PMID:35928997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9343999/
Abstract

After hearing a list of words (e.g., dream, awake, and bed), older adults tended to have more difficulty than younger adults in distinguishing targets (e.g., dream) from lures (e.g., sleep) and foils (e.g., pen) in a visual recognition test. Age-related reduction in neural discriminability in the visual cortex has been linked to deficits in memory discriminability of pictures. However, no study has examined age differences in auditory discrimination and prefrontal monitoring during true and false memory retrieval after hearing words. The current study used a visual recognition test following an auditory study of words and showed that older adults had lower true recognition and higher propensity for high-confidence false recognition compared to young adults. Using classification-based multivariate pattern analysis for functional neuroimaging data during memory retrieval, we found that neural activation patterns in the primary auditory cortex could be used to distinguish between auditorily-studied targets and unstudied lures in young adults, but not in older adults. Moreover, prefrontal monitoring for lures was weaker in older adults as compared to young adults. Individual differences analysis showed that neural discriminability in the primary auditory cortex was positively related to true recognition, whereas prefrontal activation for lures was negatively related to the propensity for high-confidence false recognition in young adults but not in older adults. Together, age differences in true and false memories following auditory study are associated with reduced neural discriminability in the primary auditory cortex and reduced prefrontal monitoring during retrieval.

摘要

在听完一系列单词(例如,梦、醒着、床)后,在一项视觉识别测试中,与年轻人相比,老年人在将目标词(例如,梦)与诱饵词(例如,睡眠)和干扰词(例如,钢笔)区分开来时往往会遇到更多困难。视觉皮层中与年龄相关的神经辨别能力下降与图片记忆辨别能力的缺陷有关。然而,尚无研究考察在听完单词后进行真假记忆检索期间听觉辨别和前额叶监测方面的年龄差异。当前的研究在对单词进行听觉研究后使用了一项视觉识别测试,结果表明,与年轻人相比,老年人的真实识别率较低,且高置信度错误识别的倾向较高。在记忆检索期间,对功能性神经成像数据使用基于分类的多变量模式分析,我们发现,在年轻人中,初级听觉皮层的神经激活模式可用于区分听觉学习过的目标词和未学习过的诱饵词,但在老年人中则不然。此外,与年轻人相比,老年人对诱饵词的前额叶监测较弱。个体差异分析表明,初级听觉皮层的神经辨别能力与真实识别呈正相关,而在年轻人中,对诱饵词的前额叶激活与高置信度错误识别的倾向呈负相关,但在老年人中并非如此。总之,听觉学习后的真假记忆中的年龄差异与初级听觉皮层中神经辨别能力下降以及检索期间前额叶监测减弱有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/810c5a282a42/fnagi-14-884993-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/2ce452928f64/fnagi-14-884993-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/880b465e697e/fnagi-14-884993-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/4bf2f7db16cd/fnagi-14-884993-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/810c5a282a42/fnagi-14-884993-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/2ce452928f64/fnagi-14-884993-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/880b465e697e/fnagi-14-884993-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/4bf2f7db16cd/fnagi-14-884993-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a5/9343999/810c5a282a42/fnagi-14-884993-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Age Effects on Neural Discriminability and Monitoring Process During Memory Retrieval for Auditory Words.年龄对听觉词汇记忆检索过程中神经可辨别性和监测过程的影响。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jul 19;14:884993. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.884993. eCollection 2022.
2
Sensory Representations Supporting Memory Specificity: Age Effects on Behavioral and Neural Discriminability.支持记忆特异性的感觉表示:年龄对行为和神经可分辨性的影响。
J Neurosci. 2019 Mar 20;39(12):2265-2275. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2022-18.2019. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
3
Differentiating True and False Schematic Memories in Older Adults.区分老年人真实和虚假的图式记忆。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Sep 15;74(7):1111-1120. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby011.
4
Age differences in the neural correlates of novelty processing: The effects of item-relatedness.新奇性加工的神经关联中的年龄差异:项目相关性的影响。
Brain Res. 2015 Jul 1;1612:2-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
5
Age-related differences in brain activity during true and false memory retrieval.真假记忆提取过程中大脑活动的年龄相关差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1390-402. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20096.
6
Why do pictures, but not visual words, reduce older adults' false memories?为什么图片而非视觉化文字能减少老年人的错误记忆?
Psychol Aging. 2015 Sep;30(3):647-55. doi: 10.1037/pag0000044. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.要点是什么?图式对真假记忆背后神经关联的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
The effect of warnings on false memories in young and older adults.警告对年轻人和老年人错误记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1065-77. doi: 10.3758/bf03194324.
9
Age-related differences in encoding-retrieval similarity and their relationship to false memory.编码-提取相似性中的年龄相关差异及其与错误记忆的关系。
Neurobiol Aging. 2022 May;113:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
10
Dynamic changes in neural representations underlie the repetition effect on false memory.神经表象的动态变化是虚假记忆的重复效应的基础。
Neuroimage. 2022 Oct 1;259:119442. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119442. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Divided attention at retrieval does not influence neural correlates of recollection in young or older adults.提取时的分散注意力并不影响年轻或年长成年人回忆的神经相关物。
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 15;250:118918. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118918. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
2
Contributions of representational distinctiveness and stability to memory performance and age differences.表征独特性和稳定性对记忆表现及年龄差异的作用。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2022 May;29(3):443-462. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.2019184. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Partially overlapping spatial environments trigger reinstatement in hippocampus and schema representations in prefrontal cortex.
部分重叠的空间环境会触发海马体中的再现和前额叶皮层中的图式表征。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 28;12(1):6231. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26560-w.
4
False recognitions in short-term memory - Age-differences in neural activity.短时记忆中的错误识别 - 神经活动的年龄差异。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Jul;151:105728. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105728. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
5
Temporal embedding and spatiotemporal feature selection boost multi-voxel pattern analysis decoding accuracy.时间嵌入和时空特征选择提高了多体素模式分析的解码精度。
J Neurosci Methods. 2020 Nov 1;345:108836. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108836. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
6
Blurring past and present: Using false memory to better understand false hearing in young and older adults.模糊过去与现在:利用错误记忆更好地理解年轻人和老年人的幻听现象。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Nov;48(8):1403-1416. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01068-8.
7
Temporal selectivity declines in the aging human auditory cortex.随着年龄的增长,人类听觉皮层的时间选择性下降。
Elife. 2020 Jul 3;9:e55300. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55300.
8
Age-related neural dedifferentiation and cognition.与年龄相关的神经去分化与认知。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020 Apr;32:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
9
Neural evidence for age-related differences in representational quality and strategic retrieval processes.神经证据表明,代表性质量和策略检索过程存在与年龄相关的差异。
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Dec;84:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Neural distinctiveness declines with age in auditory cortex and is associated with auditory GABA levels.听觉皮层的神经独特性随年龄增长而下降,与听觉 GABA 水平相关。
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 1;201:116033. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116033. Epub 2019 Jul 18.