• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的左主干病变患者和无左主干病变患者的临床事件发生率:来自欧洲 DuraGraft 登记处的结果。

Clinical event rate in patients with and without left main disease undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: results from the European DuraGraft Registry.

机构信息

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 2;62(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac403.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezac403
PMID:35929787
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is considered an independent risk factor for clinical events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We have conducted a subgroup analysis of the multicentre European DuraGraft Registry to investigate clinical event rates at 1 year in patients with and without LMCAD undergoing isolated CABG in contemporary practice.

METHODS

Patients undergoing isolated CABG were selected. The primary end point was the incidence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat revascularization (RR) at 1 year. The secondary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as MACE plus stroke. Propensity score matching was performed to balance for differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

LMCAD was present in 1033 (41.2%) and absent in 1477 (58.8%) patients. At 1 year, the MACE rate was higher for LMCAD patients (8.2% vs 5.1%, P = 0.002) driven by higher rates of death (5.4% vs 3.4%, P = 0.016), MI (3.0% vs 1.3%, P = 0.002) and numerically higher rates of RR (2.8% vs 1.8%, P = 0.13). The incidence of MACCE was 8.8% vs 6.6%, P = 0.043, with a stroke rate of 1.0% and 2.4%, P = 0.011, for the LMCAD and non-LMCAD groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the MACE rate was 8.0% vs 5.2%, P = 0.015. The incidence of death was 5.1% vs 3.7%, P = 0.10, MI 3.0% vs 1.4%, P = 0.020, and RR was 2.7% vs 1.6%, P = 0.090, for the LMCAD and non-LMCAD groups, respectively. Less strokes occurred in LMCAD patients (1.0% vs 2.4%, P = 0.017). The MACCE rate was not different, 8.5% vs 6.7%, P = 0.12.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large registry, LMCAD was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for MACE after isolated CABG. Conversely, the risk of stroke was lower in LMCAD patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02922088.

摘要

目的

左主干冠状动脉疾病(LMCAD)被认为是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后临床事件的独立危险因素。我们对多中心欧洲 DuraGraft 注册中心进行了亚组分析,以调查在当代实践中接受单纯 CABG 的有和无 LMCAD 的患者在 1 年时的临床事件发生率。

方法

选择接受单纯 CABG 的患者。主要终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率,定义为死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或重复血运重建(RR)的复合终点,在 1 年内。次要终点是主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE),定义为 MACE 加上卒中。采用倾向评分匹配来平衡基线特征的差异。

结果

LMCAD 患者 1033 例(41.2%),无 LMCAD 患者 1477 例(58.8%)。在 1 年时,LMCAD 患者的 MACE 发生率更高(8.2% vs 5.1%,P=0.002),死亡率(5.4% vs 3.4%,P=0.016)、MI(3.0% vs 1.3%,P=0.002)更高,RR 发生率(2.8% vs 1.8%,P=0.13)也更高。MACCE 的发生率为 8.8% vs 6.6%,P=0.043,LMCAD 组和非 LMCAD 组的卒中发生率分别为 1.0%和 2.4%,P=0.011。经过倾向评分匹配后,MACE 发生率为 8.0% vs 5.2%,P=0.015。LMCAD 组和非 LMCAD 组的死亡率分别为 5.1% vs 3.7%,P=0.10,MI 发生率分别为 3.0% vs 1.4%,P=0.020,RR 发生率分别为 2.7% vs 1.6%,P=0.090。LMCAD 组的卒中发生率较低(1.0% vs 2.4%,P=0.017)。MACCE 发生率无差异,8.5% vs 6.7%,P=0.12。

结论

在这项大型注册研究中,LMCAD 被证明是单纯 CABG 后 MACE 的独立危险因素。相反,LMCAD 患者的卒中风险较低。

临床试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02922088。

相似文献

1
Clinical event rate in patients with and without left main disease undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: results from the European DuraGraft Registry.接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的左主干病变患者和无左主干病变患者的临床事件发生率:来自欧洲 DuraGraft 登记处的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 2;62(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac403.
2
A novel endothelial damage inhibitor for the treatment of vascular conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol and rationale for the European, multicentre, prospective, observational DuraGraft registry.一种用于冠状动脉搭桥术中血管移植物治疗的新型内皮损伤抑制剂:欧洲多中心前瞻性观察性DuraGraft注册研究的方案与原理
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Oct 15;14(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-1010-z.
3
Clinical outcomes and quality of life after contemporary isolated coronary bypass grafting: a prospective cohort study.当代单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后的临床结果和生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Apr 1;109(4):707-715. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000259.
4
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
5
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
7
Matched Analysis of Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮与外科血运重建的配对分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar;113(3):800-807. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.043. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Left Main Revascularization With PCI or CABG in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: EXCEL Trial.左主干血运重建经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗慢性肾脏病患者: EXCEL 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 14;72(7):754-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.057.
9
Impacts of the SYNTAX score I, II and SYNTAX score II 2020 on left main revascularization.SYNTAX 评分 I、II 和 SYNTAX 评分 II 2020 对左主干血运重建的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):1073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51192-7.
10
C-reactive protein and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: Analysis from the EXCEL trial.C-反应蛋白与左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和旁路移植术后的预后:来自 EXCEL 试验的分析。
Am Heart J. 2019 Apr;210:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.013. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Transatlantic analysis of patient profiles and mid-term survival after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a head-to-head comparison between the European DuraGraft Registry and the US STS Registry.冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者资料及中期生存情况的跨大西洋分析:欧洲DuraGraft注册研究与美国胸外科医师协会(STS)注册研究的直接对比
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 12;11:1366460. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1366460. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient-Centred Outcomes after Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery: One-Year Follow-Up.全内镜心脏手术后以患者为中心的结局:一年随访
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4406. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134406.