Suppr超能文献

作物专业化对营养摄入的影响:来自中国农户的证据。

The impact of crop specialization on nutritional intake: Evidence from farm households in China.

机构信息

Center for Social Survey Research, Xuzhou Administration Institute, Xuzhou, China.

School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272347. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the wake of the severe impact of COVID-19 on the food security of the vulnerable groups in rural areas, the issue of how to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals 2 aims to "Zero Hunger" (SDG 2) and ensure the food safety of farmers has drawn unprecedented attention. Nutritional intake is generally used as an important indicator to reflect family food security. Under the background that Chinese farmers have gradually changed from the traditional diversified production mode to the specialized production of crops, the main purpose of this article is to explore what are the impact of crop specialization on farmers' nutritional intake? Could the specialization of crop production be taken as an important measure to ensure the food safety of farmers and achieve the SDG 2?

METHODS

Based on the micro-survey data from 866 farmer households in China, this paper using Seemingly Unrelated Regressions model, Group Regression model and Mediating Effect model to analyze the average and heterogeneous effects of crop specialization on the nutritional intake of farmers, as well as the mediating effect of income. In addition, robustness test and endogenous treatment were performed by using alternative explanatory variables and IV-2SLS method was used to estimate the results.

RESULTS

After correcting for endogenous bias, crop specialization had a significant negative impact on energy intake and fat intake of farmers at the statistical level of 5% and 1% respectively, especially for farmers in mountainous areas. Household income played a mediating effect on the effect of crop specialization on farmers' energy and fat intake, and the proportion of the masking effect was 8.43% and 8.96% respectively. In addition, household financial capital and social capital have a significant positive impact on farmers' nutritional intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Crop specialization cannot guarantee the food safety of farmers in terms of nutritional intake. However, when the development trend of crop specialization is irreversible, more attention should be paid to improving the level of various livelihood capital of farmers, especially those in mountainous areas, and to continuously increasing their income to ease and ultimately eliminate the negative impact of crop specialization on farmers' nutritional intake, which finally make everyone realize the SDG 2.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 对农村弱势群体的粮食安全产生严重影响的背景下,如何实现可持续发展目标 2 旨在“零饥饿”(SDG 2)并确保农民的食品安全问题引起了前所未有的关注。营养摄入通常被用作反映家庭食品安全的重要指标。在中国农民逐渐从传统的多元化生产模式转变为作物专业化生产的背景下,本文的主要目的是探讨作物专业化对农民营养摄入的影响是什么?作物生产的专业化能否作为确保农民食品安全和实现 SDG 2 的重要措施?

方法

基于中国 866 户农户的微观调查数据,本文采用似不相关回归模型、分组回归模型和中介效应模型,分析了作物专业化对农民营养摄入的平均和异质效应,以及收入的中介效应。此外,通过使用替代解释变量进行稳健性检验和内生性处理,并使用 IV-2SLS 方法进行估计结果。

结果

在纠正内生性偏差后,作物专业化对农民的能量摄入和脂肪摄入具有显著的负向影响,在 5%和 1%的统计水平上均具有统计学意义,特别是对山区农民而言。家庭收入对作物专业化对农民能量和脂肪摄入的影响起到了中介作用,掩蔽效应的比例分别为 8.43%和 8.96%。此外,家庭金融资本和社会资本对农民的营养摄入有显著的正向影响。

结论

作物专业化在营养摄入方面不能保证农民的食品安全。然而,当作物专业化的发展趋势不可逆转时,应更加关注提高农民各种生计资本的水平,特别是山区农民的水平,并不断增加他们的收入,以缓解并最终消除作物专业化对农民营养摄入的负面影响,最终使每个人都实现 SDG 2。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/9355192/1257bd70845a/pone.0272347.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of crop specialization on nutritional intake: Evidence from farm households in China.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272347. eCollection 2022.
2
Understanding nutritional intake of Chinese farmers from the perspective of sustainable livelihood analysis.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar 1. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12872-3.
4
Livelihood Capital Effects on Famers' Strategy Choices in Flood-Prone Areas-A Study in Rural China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 20;19(12):7535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127535.
5
Responding to harvest failure: Understanding farmers coping strategies in the semi-arid Northern Ghana.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284328. eCollection 2023.
6
The impact of rural e-commerce participation on farmers' entrepreneurial behavior: Evidence based on CFPS data in China.
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0300418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300418. eCollection 2024.
7
Does the Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices Impact Farmers' Income? Evidence from Ghana.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073804.
8
How livelihood capital affects farmers' willingness to pay for farmland non-market value? Evidence from Jianghan Plain, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51456-51468. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19327-3. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
9
Rural Farmers' Cognition and Climate Change Adaptation Impact on Cash Crop Productivity: Evidence from a Recent Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 1;19(19):12556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912556.
10
Influence of Small-Scale Irrigation on Livelihoods of Rural Farm Households in the Case of Legehida District, Ethiopia.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 May 23;2024:9982796. doi: 10.1155/2024/9982796. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Hunger in the midst of plenty: A survey of household food security among urban families in Lagos State, Nigeria.
J Public Health Afr. 2019 Jun 19;10(1):885. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2019.885. eCollection 2019 May 3.
2
How well do different dietary and nutrition assessment tools match? Insights from rural Kenya.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Mar;22(3):391-403. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002756. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
3
Rural food security, subsistence agriculture, and seasonality.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186406. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验