Wan Yue, Hu Wuyang, Hu Hao
College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, No. 1 WeiGang Street, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210-1067, USA.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar 1. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12872-3.
Based on the framework of sustainable livelihood analysis and using the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) data, this paper examines the connection between livelihood assets and farmers' nutritional intake. Results show that capital endowment and nutritional intake of farmers with diversified production are greater than those who specialize; capital endowment and nutritional intake of horticultural households are greater than those who engage in agriculture. Compared with non-economically disadvantaged households, higher livelihood assets have significant association with improved fat and protein intake of economically disadvantaged households. Compared with diversified farmers, more livelihood assets have significant association with improved energy and carbohydrate intake of agricultural households. Compared with those who specialize, additional livelihood assets have significant association with improved fat and protein intake of farmers with diversified production.
基于可持续生计分析框架并利用中国健康与营养调查(CHNS)数据,本文考察了生计资产与农民营养摄入之间的联系。结果表明,从事多样化生产的农民的资本禀赋和营养摄入量高于专门从事单一生产的农民;园艺户的资本禀赋和营养摄入量高于从事农业的农户。与非经济弱势家庭相比,较高的生计资产与经济弱势家庭脂肪和蛋白质摄入量的改善显著相关。与从事多样化生产的农民相比,更多的生计资产与农业户能量和碳水化合物摄入量的改善显著相关。与专门从事单一生产的农民相比,额外的生计资产与从事多样化生产的农民脂肪和蛋白质摄入量的改善显著相关。