Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.
Department of Computer Science and Statistics, College of Arts & Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 02281, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2023 Feb;27(2):578-590. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03792-5. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Peer-driven interventions can be effective in reducing HIV injection risk behaviors among people who inject drugs (PWID). We employed a causal mediation framework to examine the mediating role of recall of intervention knowledge in the relationship between a peer-driven intervention and subsequent self-reported HIV injection-related risk behavior among PWID in the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 037 study. For each intervention network, the index participant received training at baseline to become a peer educator, while non-index participants and all participants in the control networks received only HIV testing and counseling; recall of intervention knowledge was measured at the 6-month visit for each participant, and each participant was followed to ascertain HIV injection-related risk behaviors at the 12-month visit. We used inverse probability weighting to fit marginal structural models to estimate the total effect (TE) and controlled direct effect (CDE) of the intervention on the outcome. The proportion eliminated (PE) by intervening to remove mediation by the recall of intervention knowledge was computed. There were 385 participants (47% in intervention networks) included in the analysis. The TE and CDE risk ratios for the intervention were 0.47 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28, 0.78] and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.26, 2.06) and the PE was 49%. Compared to participants in the control networks, the peer-driven intervention reduced the risk of HIV injection-related risk behavior by 53%. The mediating role of recall of intervention knowledge accounted for less than 50% of the total effect of the intervention, suggesting that other potential causal pathways between the intervention and the outcome, such as motivation and skill, self-efficacy, social norms and behavior modeling, should be considered in future studies.
同伴驱动的干预措施可以有效减少注射毒品者(PWID)的艾滋病毒注射风险行为。我们采用因果中介框架,检验了在 HIV 预防试验网络(HPTN)037 研究中,同伴驱动的干预措施与 PWID 随后自我报告的与艾滋病毒注射相关的风险行为之间的关系中,干预知识回忆的中介作用。对于每个干预网络,指数参与者在基线时接受培训成为同伴教育者,而非指数参与者和对照组网络中的所有参与者仅接受艾滋病毒检测和咨询;在每个参与者的 6 个月访视时测量干预知识回忆,在 12 个月访视时对每个参与者进行随访,以确定与艾滋病毒注射相关的风险行为。我们使用逆概率加权来拟合边缘结构模型,以估计干预对结局的总效应(TE)和控制直接效应(CDE)。通过干预消除中介作用的比例(PE)进行了计算。分析纳入了 385 名参与者(47%在干预网络中)。干预的 TE 和 CDE 风险比分别为 0.47(95%置信区间[CI]:0.28,0.78)和 0.73(95% CI:0.26,2.06),PE 为 49%。与对照组网络中的参与者相比,同伴驱动的干预降低了与艾滋病毒注射相关的风险行为的风险 53%。干预知识回忆的中介作用占干预总效应的比例不足 50%,这表明在未来的研究中,应该考虑干预与结果之间的其他潜在因果途径,如动机和技能、自我效能、社会规范和行为建模。