Animal and Veterinary Research Center (CECAV), Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), Department of Veterinary Science, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Food Safety and Food Hygiene, Berlin, Germany.
Res Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 20;152:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
Meat inspection (MI) is essential to verify compliance with legal requirements related to human and animal health and animal welfare protections. Judgement criteria applied during MI, resulting in condemnation data of importance, among other things, for livestock producers and for benchmarking reasons. However, although the Meat Inspection Regulation sets out judgement criteria, most are generic, favouring flexibility, but also subjectivity. To address the degree of variation on total condemnation (TC) criteria applied during post-mortem inspection (PMI) of finishing pigs, an online survey was prepared aiming to collect this information from several European countries. The focus was on TC criteria regarding the following PMI findings: abscesses, arthritis, cachexia, erysipelas, icterus, Mycobacterium-like lesions, osteomyelitis, peritonitis, pleuritis and pneumonia. From September to November 2020, a total of 44 completed questionnaires were obtained from 26 European countries. The results showed a substantial variation in the TC criteria in place in the participating countries. One of the main reasons for the variability seen in the respondents' reported answers was related to the indicators used to define a generalised condition related to the 10 PMI findings addressed, making harmonisation a challenge and avoiding to draw conclusions when comparing condemnation causes between abattoirs. This implies that it would make sense to look into how a generalised condition can be identified/described and how it should be judged. The results should be used as inspiration towards possible harmonisation, improving decision-making, and permitting comparative analysis between different reports to allow trend analyses and benchmarking.
肉品检验(MI)对于验证与人类和动物健康以及动物福利保护相关的法律要求的遵守情况至关重要。MI 过程中应用的判断标准除其他外,对于牲畜生产者和基准比较原因来说,是重要的淘汰数据的判断标准。然而,尽管《肉类检验条例》规定了判断标准,但大多数都是通用的,有利于灵活性,但也具有主观性。为了解决在屠宰后检查(PMI)中应用的总淘汰(TC)标准的变化程度,我们准备了一份在线调查,旨在从几个欧洲国家收集有关信息。重点是 TC 标准,涉及以下 PMI 发现:脓肿、关节炎、恶病质、丹毒、黄疸、类分枝杆菌病变、骨髓炎、腹膜炎、胸膜炎和肺炎。2020 年 9 月至 11 月,从 26 个欧洲国家共获得了 44 份完整的调查问卷。结果表明,参与国之间的 TC 标准存在很大差异。造成答复者报告的差异的主要原因之一是与针对所涉及的 10 个 PMI 发现定义的一般情况相关的指标有关,这使得协调工作具有挑战性,并避免在比较屠宰场之间的淘汰原因时得出结论。这意味着,研究如何确定/描述一般情况以及如何进行判断是有意义的。结果应作为可能的协调、改进决策以及允许在不同报告之间进行比较分析以进行趋势分析和基准比较的灵感来源。