Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Oct;45(5):3349-3359. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01841-0. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Secondary to the creation of a surgical corridor and retraction, white matter tracts degenerate, causing long-term scarring with potential neurological consequences. Third and lateral ventricle tumors require surgery that may lead to cognitive impairment. Our objective is to compare the long-term consequences of a transcortical transfrontal approach and an interhemispheric transcallosal approach on corpus callosum and frontal white matter tracts degeneration. Surgical patients with ventricular tumor accessible through both approaches were included and clinico-radiological data were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the callosotomy length at 3-month post-operative T1 MRI, corrected by the extension of the tumor and the use of neuronavigation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative criteria such as bleeding, use of retractors and duration, FLAIR hypersignal on 3-month MRI, and re-do surgeries. To assess white matter tract interruption, 3-month FLAIR hypersignal was superposed to a tractography atlas. Seventy patients were included, 57 (81%) in the transfrontal group and 13 (19%) in the interhemispheric group. There was no difference in the mean callosotomy length on 3-month MRI (12.3 mm ± 5.60 transfrontal vs 11.7 mm ± 3.92 interhemispheric, p = 0.79) on univariate and multivariate analyses. The callosotomy length was inferior by - 3.13 mm for tumors located exclusively in the third ventricle (p = 0.016), independent of the approach. Retractors were used more often in transfrontal approaches (60% vs 33%, p < 0.001). The extent of frontal FLAIR hypersignal was higher after transfrontal approach (14.1 mm vs 0.525 mm, p < 0.001), correlated to the use of retractors (p < 0.05). After the interhemispheric approach, no tract other than corpus callosum was interrupted, whereas, after the transfrontal approach, frontal arcuate fibers and projections from the thalamus were interrupted in all patients, the cingulum in 19 (33%), the superior fronto-occipital fasciculus in 15 (26%), and the superior longitudinal fasciculus in 2 (3%). Transfrontal and interhemispheric approaches to the third and lateral ventricles both lead to the same long-term damage to the corpus callosum, but the transfrontal approach interrupts several white matter tracts essential to cognitive tasks such as attention and planning, even in the non-dominant hemisphere. These results encourage all neurosurgeons to be familiar with both approaches and favor the interhemispheric approach when both can give access to the tumor with a comparable risk. Neuropsychological studies are necessary to correlate these anatomical findings to cognitive outcomes.
继发性于手术通道的建立和牵开,白质束发生退化,导致长期瘢痕形成,并可能产生神经学后果。第三脑室和侧脑室肿瘤需要手术,这可能导致认知障碍。我们的目的是比较经皮质额下入路和经胼胝体-透明隔入路对胼胝体和额白质束退化的长期影响。选择通过两种入路均可到达的脑室肿瘤患者进行研究,并回顾性分析临床放射学数据。主要终点是术后 3 个月 T1 MRI 的胼胝体切开长度,校正肿瘤的延伸和神经导航的使用。次要结果包括围手术期标准,如出血、牵开器的使用和时间、术后 3 个月 MRI 的 FLAIR 高信号,以及再次手术。为了评估白质束的中断,将术后 3 个月的 FLAIR 高信号与束流图谱叠加。共纳入 70 例患者,其中 57 例(81%)采用经额入路,13 例(19%)采用经胼胝体-透明隔入路。单因素和多因素分析均显示,术后 3 个月 MRI 的胼胝体切开长度无差异(12.3±5.60mm 经额 vs 11.7±3.92mm 经胼胝体-透明隔,p=0.79)。对于仅位于第三脑室的肿瘤,切开长度短 3.13mm(p=0.016),与手术入路无关。经额入路更常使用牵开器(60% vs 33%,p<0.001)。经额入路术后额部 FLAIR 高信号范围更大(14.1mm vs 0.525mm,p<0.001),与牵开器的使用有关(p<0.05)。经胼胝体-透明隔入路后,除胼胝体外,无其他白质束中断,而经额入路后,所有患者的额弓形纤维和丘脑投射纤维均中断,19 例(33%)中断扣带束,15 例(26%)中断上额枕额束,2 例(3%)中断上纵束。经额和经胼胝体-透明隔入路治疗第三脑室和侧脑室肿瘤均会导致胼胝体的长期损伤,但经额入路会中断对注意力和规划等认知任务至关重要的几个白质束,即使在非优势半球也是如此。这些结果鼓励所有神经外科医生熟悉这两种方法,并在两种方法都能以相似的风险到达肿瘤时,优先考虑经胼胝体-透明隔入路。需要进行神经心理学研究,将这些解剖学发现与认知结果相关联。