• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于努力程度在急性脑损伤康复后作用的观察性队列研究。

An Observational Cohort Study of the Role of Level of Effort in Post-Acute Brain Injury Rehabilitation.

机构信息

From the On With Life, Ankeny, IA.

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb;104(2):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.013
PMID:35934046
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of participant level of effort (LoE) on outcome in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation with the hypothesis that greater effort is associated with more positive outcomes.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Comprehensive integrated rehabilitation program for brain injury within a skilled nursing facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive admissions with acquired brain injury (N=101).

INTERVENTIONS

Individualized interdisciplinary brain injury rehabilitation; therapist rating of participant LoE with Acquired Brain Injury LoE Scale (ABI-LoES) during physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech and language pathology sessions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory, fourth edition (MPAI-4); Supervision Rating Scale (SRS).

RESULTS

Linear regression showed that discharge MPAI-4 Total T scores were significantly associated with mean ABI-LoES rating, admission MPAI-4 Total T scores, age at admission, and days from injury but not with standard deviation of ABI-LoES rating, sex, injury type, length of stay, or treatment before or during the COVID-19 pandemic. Discharge SRS scores were significantly associated with mean ABI-LoES rating, admission SRS scores, and age. A 1-unit increase in mean ABI-LoES rating was associated with 5.1-unit lower discharge MPAI-4 Total T scores and 1.5 lower discharge SRS scores, after controlling for other variables. Logistic regression showed that the odds of achieving a minimal clinically important difference on the MPAI-4 were 8.34 times higher with each 1-unit increase in mean ABI-LoES rating after controlling for other variables. Admission MPAI-4 was negatively associated with mean ABI-LoES rating (β=-0.07, t=-8.85, P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for nonmodifiable variables, average ABI-LoES rating is positively associated with outcome. Initial level of disability is negatively associated with mean ABI-LoES rating.

摘要

目的

研究参与者努力程度(LoE)对急性脑损伤后康复结果的影响,假设努力程度与更好的结果相关。

设计

观察性队列研究。

设置

在熟练护理设施内进行的综合综合脑损伤康复计划。

参与者

连续入组的获得性脑损伤患者(N=101)。

干预

个体化的跨学科脑损伤康复;在物理治疗、职业治疗和言语治疗期间,使用获得性脑损伤 LoE 量表(ABI-LoES)对患者的 LoE 进行治疗师评定。

主要结果测量

明尼苏达适应行为评定量表第四版(MPAI-4);监督评分量表(SRS)。

结果

线性回归显示,出院 MPAI-4 总 T 评分与 ABI-LoES 评分的平均值、入院 MPAI-4 总 T 评分、入院年龄和受伤后天数显著相关,但与 ABI-LoES 评分的标准差、性别、损伤类型、住院时间或 COVID-19 大流行期间或之前的治疗无关。出院 SRS 评分与 ABI-LoES 评分的平均值、入院 SRS 评分和年龄显著相关。在控制其他变量后,ABI-LoES 评分的平均值每增加 1 个单位,出院 MPAI-4 总 T 评分降低 5.1 个单位,出院 SRS 评分降低 1.5 个单位。Logistic 回归显示,在控制其他变量后,ABI-LoES 评分的平均值每增加 1 个单位,患者在 MPAI-4 上达到最小临床重要差异的可能性就增加 8.34 倍。入院 MPAI-4 与 ABI-LoES 评分的平均值呈负相关(β=-0.07,t=-8.85,P<.0001)。

结论

在控制不可变变量后,平均 ABI-LoES 评分与结果呈正相关。初始残疾程度与 ABI-LoES 评分的平均值呈负相关。

相似文献

1
An Observational Cohort Study of the Role of Level of Effort in Post-Acute Brain Injury Rehabilitation.一项关于努力程度在急性脑损伤康复后作用的观察性队列研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb;104(2):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Evaluation of Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcomes With Quasi-Experimental Controls.采用准实验对照评估出院后脑损伤康复效果
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000993. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Outcomes of Six Specific Types of Post-Hospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Programs.六种特定类型的院后脑损伤康复项目的结果
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(1):27-37. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000980. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
Progress assessed with the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in 604 participants in 4 types of post-inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs.604 名参与四种类型住院后康复脑损伤项目的参与者使用 Mayo-Portland 适应能力量表进行评估的进展情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.038.
5
The effect of access to a designated interdisciplinary post-acute rehabilitation service on participant outcomes after brain injury.指定的跨学科后期康复服务对脑损伤患者康复效果的影响。
Brain Inj. 2020 Aug 23;34(10):1358-1366. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1802660. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Rehabilitation outcomes at discharge from staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation: A retrospective cohort study (ABI-RESTaRT), Western Australia, 2011-2020.西澳大利亚州2011 - 2020年分阶段社区脑损伤康复出院时的康复结局:一项回顾性队列研究(ABI - RESTaRT)
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 21;13:925225. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.925225. eCollection 2022.
7
Early Supported Discharge for Neurorehabilitation Following Acquired Brain Injury.获得性脑损伤后神经康复的早期支持性出院
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 30;11:596526. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.596526. eCollection 2020.
8
Community Rehabilitation Outcomes for Different Stroke Diagnoses: An Observational Cohort Study.不同中风诊断的社区康复结果:一项观察性队列研究。
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Mar 4;2(2):100047. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100047. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Effectiveness of home- and community-based rehabilitation in a large cohort of patients disabled by cerebrovascular accident: evidence of a dose-response relationship.家庭和社区康复对大量脑血管意外致残患者的有效性:剂量反应关系的证据。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1837-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
10
Rasch Analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory for Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation.用于院后脑损伤康复的梅奥-波特兰适应性量表的拉施分析。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000935. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Relationship Between the Contents of a Goal-Setting Diary and Goal Attainment: A Foundational Study for Healthy Individuals.探索目标设定日记的内容与目标达成之间的关系:一项针对健康个体的基础研究。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 18;17(4):e82543. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82543. eCollection 2025 Apr.