• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松与氨苄西林治疗社区获得性肺炎。倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. A propensity matched cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine A, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jan;29(1):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.022. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.022
PMID:35934196
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ceftriaxone is recommended as first-line antibiotic treatment (with the addition of macrolide) for hospitalised adults with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Narrower-spectrum β-lactam as ampicillin, may be associated with comparable clinical outcomes, with less emergence of resistant pathogens or Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). We aimed to examine whether ampicillin and ceftriaxone (with the addition of macrolides for both arms) are comparable for the treatment of hospitalized adults due to CAP.

METHODS

This was a single center, observational cohort study. We included adult patients who were hospitalized in internal medicine wards due to CAP and were treated with either ceftriaxone or ampicillin with the addition of macrolide. A propensity-score model was used. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. A multivariable logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. We performed subgroup analyses for the main outcome based on CURB-65 score and age.

RESULTS

A total of 1586 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was no difference in 30-day mortality rate in the total cohort (28/233 vs. 208/1353 in ampicillin and ceftriaxone arm, respectively; p = 0.184). In the propensity matched cohort (197 in ampicillin and 394 in ceftriaxone arm), there was no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality between treatment groups in multivariable analysis of the main model (OR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.37-1.2; p = 0.189) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.108). Thirty-day mortality rate was (19/197 vs. 57/394, in ampicillin and ceftriaxone arms, respectively; p = 0.108) Patients who were treated with ampicillin experienced significantly lower rates of CDI (0/197, 0% vs. 8/394, 2%; p = 0.044).

DISCUSSION

Ampicillin was associated with comparable clinical outcomes in comparison to ceftriaxone for patients who were hospitalized due to CAP. Ampicillin was associated with significantly lower rate of CDI. Results need to be confirmed by more robust study designs.

摘要

目的

头孢曲松被推荐作为住院成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的一线抗生素治疗药物(联合使用大环内酯类药物)。窄谱β-内酰胺类药物如氨苄西林,可能与类似的临床结局相关,且耐药病原体或艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的发生率更低。我们旨在研究氨苄西林和头孢曲松(联合使用两种药物的大环内酯类药物)治疗住院成人 CAP 是否具有可比性。

方法

这是一项单中心观察性队列研究。我们纳入了因 CAP 而在内科病房住院的成年患者,他们接受了头孢曲松或氨苄西林联合大环内酯类药物治疗。采用倾向评分模型。主要结局为 30 天全因死亡率。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析和 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析。我们根据 CURB-65 评分和年龄对主要结局进行了亚组分析。

结果

共有 1586 名患者符合纳入标准。在总队列中,30 天死亡率无差异(头孢曲松组 28/233 例,氨苄西林组 208/1353 例;p=0.184)。在倾向评分匹配队列(氨苄西林组 197 例,头孢曲松组 394 例)中,多变量主模型分析中两组间 30 天全因死亡率无显著差异(OR 0.67,95%CI,0.37-1.2;p=0.189)和 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析(p=0.108)。30 天死亡率分别为(头孢曲松组 19/233 例,氨苄西林组 57/1353 例;p=0.108)。接受氨苄西林治疗的患者 CDI 发生率明显较低(头孢曲松组 0/197 例,0% vs. 394 例,8%;p=0.044)。

讨论

与头孢曲松相比,氨苄西林治疗 CAP 住院患者的临床结局相当。氨苄西林与 CDI 发生率显著降低相关。结果需要更稳健的研究设计来证实。

相似文献

1
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. A propensity matched cohort study.头孢曲松与氨苄西林治疗社区获得性肺炎。倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jan;29(1):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.022. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Ceftriaxone 1 g versus 2 g per day, for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.头孢曲松 1 克/天与 2 克/天治疗社区获得性肺炎:一项回顾性队列研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Oct;18(7):1919-1927. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03372-y. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
Comparison of ceftriaxone plus macrolide and ampicillin/sulbactam plus macrolide in treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia without risk factors for aspiration: an open-label, quasi-randomized, controlled trial.头孢曲松联合大环内酯类药物与氨苄西林/舒巴坦联合大环内酯类药物治疗无吸入风险因素的社区获得性肺炎患者的比较:一项开放标签、拟随机、对照试验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01198-4.
4
Effectiveness of β-Lactam Monotherapy vs Macrolide Combination Therapy for Children Hospitalized With Pneumonia.β-内酰胺单药治疗与大环内酯类联合治疗对肺炎住院儿童的有效性
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1184-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3225.
5
Ceftriaxone versus ceftriaxone plus a macrolide for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients with HIV/AIDS: a randomized controlled trial.头孢曲松与头孢曲松联合大环内酯类药物治疗住院 HIV/AIDS 合并社区获得性肺炎的随机对照试验。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Feb;24(2):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Oral gemifloxacin versus sequential therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime with or without a macrolide in the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of clinical efficacy and tolerability.口服吉米沙星与静脉注射头孢曲松/口服头孢呋辛序贯治疗(联合或不联合大环内酯类药物)在社区获得性肺炎住院患者治疗中的应用:一项关于临床疗效和耐受性的随机、开放标签、多中心研究
Clin Ther. 2002 Nov;24(11):1915-36. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80088-1.
7
Comparative Efficacy of Beta-Lactams and Macrolides in the Treatment of Pediatric Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.β-内酰胺类和大环内酯类药物治疗儿童肺炎的疗效比较:系统评价。
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2020;16(4):307-313. doi: 10.2174/1573396316666200907115800.
8
Macrolides are associated with a better survival rate in patients hospitalized with community-acquired but not healthcare-associated pneumonia.大环内酯类药物与社区获得性肺炎而非医疗保健相关性肺炎住院患者的较高生存率相关。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):283-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.076. Epub 2014 May 6.
9
Usefulness of β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy for treating community-acquired pneumonia patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit: Propensity score analysis of a prospective cohort study.β-内酰胺类和大环内酯类联合治疗在重症监护病房住院的社区获得性肺炎患者中的作用:一项前瞻性队列研究的倾向评分分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Oct;27(10):1447-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Comparative effectiveness of ceftriaxone in combination with a macrolide compared with ceftriaxone alone for pediatric patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.对于因社区获得性肺炎住院的儿科患者,头孢曲松联合大环内酯类药物与单独使用头孢曲松的比较疗效。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Apr;33(4):387-92. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000119.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating computational approaches to uncover β-lactamase-associated resistance in diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from pediatric patients.整合计算方法以揭示儿科患者腹泻性大肠杆菌中与β-内酰胺酶相关的耐药性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 22;15(1):30921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16122-1.
2
The Evolution of the Antimicrobial Resistance of in Tunisia: A Multicentric Analysis over Two Decades (2000-2019).突尼斯抗菌药物耐药性的演变:二十年(2000 - 2019年)的多中心分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 10;14(2):171. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14020171.
3
Convergent impact of vaccination and antibiotic pressures on pneumococcal populations.
疫苗接种和抗生素压力对肺炎球菌群体的趋同影响。
Cell Chem Biol. 2024 Feb 15;31(2):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Dec 4.