Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, He Fei, China.
Department of Organ Procurement Organization, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, He Fei, China.
Transplant Proc. 2022 Sep;54(7):1865-1873. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.05.020. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
Liver transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD) is associated with considerable rates of primary nonfunction and ischemic-type biliary lesions. Compared with donation was after brain death (DBD), the biggest disadvantage of DCD is warm ischemia injury in the procurement stage. Donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) is a unique practice in China. Such donors should donate according to the DCD procedure, that is, remove life support and donate after cardiac arrest. We retrospectively analyzed donor and recipient characteristics with preoperative and postoperative parameters according to 3 donation types to comprehensively describe incidence of ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) related biliary complications among different donor type adult liver transplantation recipients. A total of 50 patients were included in this study (DBD group n = 17, DCD group n = 26, DBCD group n = 7). Only 1 patient, whose donor type was DBCD was diagnosed with ischemic-type biliary lesions demonstrated cast and retrograde ascending cholangitis. Rates of primary graft non-function (DBD n = 1, 5.9%; DCD n = 2, 7.7%; DBCD, 0%; P = .546) were similar and total biliary complications (DBD n = 1, 5.9%; DCD n = 1, 3.8%; DBCD N = 2, 28.6%; P = .042) were different. No differences were found regarding development of postreperfusion syndrome or coagulopathy in 3 groups. Compared with standard DBD donor, the clinical outcome of DCD donor liver transplantation was satisfactory, with no increase in the incidence of IRI, and, no difference in the incidence of ischemic bile duct complications. This work was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.
肝移植取自心跳停止后(DCD)的供体与原发性无功能和缺血性胆管病变的发生率相当。与脑死亡(DBD)供体相比,DCD 的最大缺点是在获取阶段存在热缺血损伤。脑死亡后心跳停止(DBCD)是中国特有的一种做法。此类供体应按照 DCD 程序进行捐献,即撤除生命支持,在心脏停搏后进行捐献。我们根据 3 种供体类型的术前和术后参数回顾性分析了供体和受者的特征,以全面描述不同供体类型成人肝移植受者缺血再灌注损伤(IRI)相关胆管并发症的发生率。本研究共纳入 50 例患者(DBD 组 n=17,DCD 组 n=26,DBCD 组 n=7)。只有 1 例供体类型为 DBCD 的患者被诊断为缺血性胆管病变,表现为铸型和逆行性上行性胆管炎。原发性移植物无功能的发生率(DBD n=1,5.9%;DCD n=2,7.7%;DBCD,0%;P=0.546)相似,总胆管并发症发生率(DBD n=1,5.9%;DCD n=1,3.8%;DBCD n=2,28.6%;P=0.042)不同。3 组间再灌注后综合征或凝血障碍的发展无差异。与标准 DBD 供体相比,DCD 供体肝移植的临床结果令人满意,IRI 的发生率没有增加,缺血性胆管并发症的发生率也没有差异。本工作符合赫尔辛基大会和伊斯坦布尔宣言的规定。