• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分小肠黏膜下肿块与良性膨出的评分再现性和可靠性。

Score reproducibility and reliability in differentiating small bowel subepithelial masses from innocent bulges.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta.

Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2022 Oct;54(10):1403-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.027. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.027
PMID:35934647
Abstract

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to assess the reliability, intra- and inter-observer variation of the SPICE, Mucosal protrusion angle (MPA) and SHYUNG scores in differentiating a subepithelial mass (SEM) from a bulge.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study analysed the 3 scores, radiological studies, enteroscopy and/or surgical findings.

RESULTS

100 patients with a potential SEM (mean age 57.6years) were recruited with 75 patients having pathology. In patients with a SEM the mean SPICE score was 2.04 (95% CI 1.82-2.26) as compared to 1.16 (95% CI 0.81-1.51) without any pathology (AUC 0.74, p<0.001), with a fair intra-observer agreement (Kappa 0.3, p<0.001) and slight inter-observer agreement (Kappa 0.14, p<0.05). SPICE had a 37.3% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity in distinguishing between a SEM and bulge, whereas MPA<90˚ had 58.7% and 76.0% respectively, with poor intra-observer(p = 0.05) and interobserver agreement (p = 0.64). The SHYUNG demonstrated a moderate intra-observer (Kappa 0.44, p<0.001) and slight inter-observer reliability (Kappa 0.18, p<0.001). The sensitivity of an elevated SHYUNG score (≥4) in identifying a SEM was 18.7% with a specificity of 92.0% (AUC 0.71, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Though these scores are easy to use, they have, at best, slight to moderate intra and inter-observer agreement. Their overall diagnostic performances are limited.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估 SPICE、黏膜突起角(MPA)和 SHYUNG 评分在区分黏膜下肿块(SEM)与隆起之间的可靠性、观察者内和观察者间的变异性。

方法

这项回顾性多中心研究分析了这 3 个评分、影像学研究、内镜检查和/或手术结果。

结果

共纳入 100 例有 SEM 潜在可能的患者(平均年龄 57.6 岁),其中 75 例患者有病理学结果。在 SEM 患者中,SPICE 评分的平均值为 2.04(95%CI 1.82-2.26),而无任何病理学表现的患者为 1.16(95%CI 0.81-1.51)(AUC 0.74,p<0.001),观察者内的一致性为中等(Kappa 0.3,p<0.001),观察者间的一致性为轻微(Kappa 0.14,p<0.05)。SPICE 在区分 SEM 和隆起方面的敏感性为 37.3%,特异性为 92.0%,而 MPA<90˚的敏感性分别为 58.7%和 76.0%,观察者内的一致性较差(p=0.05),观察者间的一致性也较差(p=0.64)。SHYUNG 评分显示出中等的观察者内一致性(Kappa 0.44,p<0.001)和轻微的观察者间可靠性(Kappa 0.18,p<0.001)。升高的 SHYUNG 评分(≥4)在识别 SEM 时的敏感性为 18.7%,特异性为 92.0%(AUC 0.71,p=0.002)。

结论

尽管这些评分易于使用,但它们的观察者内和观察者间一致性最好也只是轻微到中等。它们的整体诊断性能有限。

相似文献

1
Score reproducibility and reliability in differentiating small bowel subepithelial masses from innocent bulges.区分小肠黏膜下肿块与良性膨出的评分再现性和可靠性。
Dig Liver Dis. 2022 Oct;54(10):1403-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.027. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.经阴道超声“滑动征”技术的离线分析预测道格拉斯窝消失:观察者间和观察者内的可重复性。
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1237-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det044. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
3
Development of a novel index to discriminate bulge from mass on small-bowel capsule endoscopy.开发一种新的指数,用于区分小肠胶囊内镜中的隆起与肿块。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1067-74; quiz 1115.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.022. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
4
Role of Mucosal Protrusion Angle in Discriminating between True and False Masses of the Small Bowel on Video Capsule Endoscopy.黏膜突出角度在视频胶囊内镜鉴别小肠真假肿物中的作用
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 27;8(4):418. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040418.
5
Analysis of a grading system to assess the quality of small-bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy: in search of the Holy Grail.评估胶囊内镜小肠准备质量的分级系统分析:探寻圣杯
Endosc Int Open. 2014 Sep;2(3):E183-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377521. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
6
The reliability and reproducibility of the Hertel classification for comminuted proximal humeral fractures compared with the Neer classification.与Neer分类法相比,Hertel分类法用于肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的可靠性和可重复性。
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Sep;21(5):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
7
Evaluation of a new composite score combining SPICE and protrusion angle scores to distinguish submucosal lesions from innocent bulges.评估一种新的复合评分,将 SPICE 评分和隆起角评分相结合,以区分黏膜下病变和良性隆起。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022 Mar;114(3):151-155. doi: 10.17235/reed.2021.8080/2021.
8
Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement Between Embryologists for Cytoplasmic String Assessment in Day 5/6 Human Blastocysts.第 5/6 天人类囊胚胞质丝评估中胚胎学家之间的组内和组间一致性。
Reprod Sci. 2023 Jun;30(6):1917-1926. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01151-2. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Inter- and Intraobserver Reliabilities of Four Different Radiographic Grading Scales of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint.膝关节骨关节炎四种不同影像学分级量表的观察者间及观察者内可靠性
J Knee Surg. 2018 Mar;31(3):247-253. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602249. Epub 2017 May 1.
10
Inter- and intra-observer variation in classification systems for impending fractures of bone metastases.骨转移瘤即将发生骨折的分类系统中观察者间和观察者内的变异。
Skeletal Radiol. 2010 Feb;39(2):155-60. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0823-6. Epub 2009 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmet Needs of Artificial Intelligence in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.小肠胶囊内镜中人工智能未满足的需求
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;15(9):1092. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091092.
2
Bowel preparation for small bowel capsule endoscopy: standard regimen with 2 L polyethylene glycol versus 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate.小肠胶囊内镜检查的肠道准备:2升聚乙二醇标准方案与1升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸的比较。
Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):285-290. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.097. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
3
The Role of Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Tumors: A Narrative Review.
胶囊内镜在小肠肿瘤诊断与管理中的作用:一项叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 7;16(2):262. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020262.
4
Inter/Intra-Observer Agreement in Video-Capsule Endoscopy: Are We Getting It All Wrong? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.视频胶囊内镜检查中观察者间/观察者内一致性:我们全错了吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 2;12(10):2400. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102400.