Batlle Astrid, Boada Imma, Thió-Henestrosa Santiago, de Sevilla Mariona Fernández, García-García Juan José
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Graphics and Imaging Laboratory, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 22;10:928273. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.928273. eCollection 2022.
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu (Barcelona) initiated a pediatric acute home-hospitalization program. Due to high patient turnover and the health staff's lack of planning training, daily scheduling was a time-consuming task. Home-hospitalization planning is a vehicle routing problem that can be solved with a technological solution. It was therefore decided to evaluate the efficacy and necessity of the SmartMonkey.io planner.
To compare traditional manual route planning with a route optimizer, and to evaluate the technical feasibility of the implementation of a route planner into a homecare program.
Eight participants (experienced homecare staff and inexperienced hospital staff) were included. Personal interviews were performed to assess their eagerness to try a technological solution to the planning problem. Objective benefits including reduced travel time (time planning, distance traveled, and time traveled) were evaluated. Paired -test, -test, and Pearson's correlation were used to compare manual and route planner scheduling. Participants then answered a questionnaire to assess planning difficulty and the acceptance of the route planner.
Homecare staff were initially reluctant to use the technology. Significant differences ( < 0.0001) in three variables were found between manual planning and the route planner. A moderate correlation between time planning and plan difficulty ( = 0.59, < 0.0001) was found with manual planning but not with the route planner. All route planner schedules saved time and distance. No significant differences were found between expertise and planning method. It was noted that it was easy to create plans with the route planner, while difficulty with manual planning increased as more locations were added. All participants evaluated the route planning tool favorably.
Route-planning technology saved planning time and generated better plans than manual planning. The route planner's learning curve was fast and results were obtained in the same amount of time regardless of difficulty and expertise. SmartMonkey.io also has the potential to reduce internal and environmental costs and increase staff productivity.
巴塞罗那圣琼德乌医院启动了一项儿科急性家庭住院计划。由于患者周转频繁且医护人员缺乏规划培训,日常排班是一项耗时的任务。家庭住院规划是一个车辆路径问题,可以通过技术解决方案来解决。因此,决定评估SmartMonkey.io规划器的有效性和必要性。
比较传统的手动路径规划与路径优化器,并评估将路径规划器应用于家庭护理计划的技术可行性。
纳入了八名参与者(经验丰富的家庭护理人员和经验不足的医院工作人员)。进行了个人访谈,以评估他们尝试用技术解决方案解决规划问题的意愿。评估了包括减少出行时间(规划时间、行驶距离和出行时间)在内的客观效益。使用配对t检验、t检验和皮尔逊相关性来比较手动排班和路径规划器排班。参与者随后回答了一份问卷,以评估规划难度和对路径规划器的接受程度。
家庭护理人员最初不愿使用该技术。在手动规划和路径规划器之间,发现三个变量存在显著差异(P<0.0001)。手动规划时,规划时间与规划难度之间存在中等相关性(r = 0.59,P<0.0001),而路径规划器则不存在这种相关性。所有路径规划器的排班都节省了时间和距离。在专业知识和规划方法之间未发现显著差异。值得注意的是,使用路径规划器很容易创建计划,而随着添加的地点增多,手动规划的难度会增加。所有参与者对路径规划工具的评价都很高。
路径规划技术比手动规划节省了规划时间,并生成了更好的计划。路径规划器的学习曲线很陡,无论难度和专业知识如何,都能在相同的时间内获得结果。SmartMonkey.io还有可能降低内部和环境成本,并提高员工生产力。