Promratpan Wasinee, Theerasuwipakorn Nonthikorn, Lertsuwunseri Vorarit, Srimahachota Suphot
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 10330, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2022;14(2):101-107. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2022.16. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) are treatments of choice for severe rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). Data regarding the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent PTMC and MVR are limited. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with severe rheumatic MS who underwent PTMC or MVR between 2010 to 2020. The primary outcome comprised of all-cause death, stroke or systemic embolism, heart failure hospitalization and re-intervention. Cox regression was used to investigate predictors of the primary outcome. 264 patients were included in analysis, 164 patients (62.1%) in PTMC group and 100 patients in MVR group (37.9%). The majority were females (80.7%) and had atrial fibrillation (68.6%). The mean age was 49.52 (SD: 13.03) years old. MVR group had more age and AF, higher Wilkins' score with smaller MVA. Primary outcome occurred significantly higher in PTMC group (37.2% vs 22%, =0.002), as well as, re-intervention (18.3% vs 0%, <0.001). However, all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism and heart failure hospitalization were not significantly different. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, PTMC (HR 1.94; 95%CI 1.14, 3.32; =0.015), older age (HR 1.03; 95%CI 1.01, 1.06; =0.009) and SPAP > 50 mmHg (HR 2.99; 95%CI 1.01, 8.84; =0.047) were the only predictors of primary outcome. Primary outcome occurred in PTMC group more than MVR group which was driven by re-intervention. However, all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism and heart failure hospitalization were not significantly different.
经皮二尖瓣交界切开术(PTMC)和二尖瓣置换术(MVR)是重度风湿性二尖瓣狭窄(MS)的首选治疗方法。关于接受PTMC和MVR治疗的患者长期预后的数据有限。开展了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估2010年至2020年间接受PTMC或MVR治疗的重度风湿性MS患者的长期预后。主要结局包括全因死亡、中风或全身性栓塞、心力衰竭住院和再次干预。采用Cox回归分析来探究主要结局的预测因素。264例患者纳入分析,PTMC组164例(62.1%),MVR组100例(37.9%)。大多数为女性(80.7%)且患有房颤(68.6%)。平均年龄为49.52(标准差:13.03)岁。MVR组年龄更大、房颤更多,威尔金斯评分更高而二尖瓣口面积更小。PTMC组主要结局发生率显著更高(37.2%对22%,P = 0.002),再次干预也是如此(18.3%对0%,P < 0.001)。然而,全因死亡率、中风或全身性栓塞以及心力衰竭住院率并无显著差异。在多因素Cox回归分析中,PTMC(风险比1.94;95%置信区间1.14,3.32;P = 0.015)、年龄较大(风险比1.03;95%置信区间1.01,1.06;P = 0.009)和收缩期肺动脉压>50 mmHg(风险比2.99;95%置信区间1.01,8.84;P = 0.047)是主要结局的唯一预测因素。PTMC组主要结局发生率高于MVR组,这是由再次干预导致的。然而,全因死亡率、中风或全身性栓塞以及心力衰竭住院率并无显著差异。