Guo Dong, Fang Liang, Liu Ruiqing, Li Yu, Lv Liang, Niu Zhaojiao, Chen Dong, Zhou Yanbing, Zhu Weiming
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, The affiliated hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Jul 27;2022:6147124. doi: 10.1155/2022/6147124. eCollection 2022.
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) and corticosteroids on the gut microbiome in Crohn's disease. . Data were collected for 16 patients newly diagnosed with CD as the test group and 10 healthy volunteers as the control group. The 16 patients were randomly divided into the EEN group and the corticosteroids group. For subsequent analysis, 6 patients in the EEN group with follow-up were enrolled to compare the 0-month, 1-month, and 3-month outcomes. We analyzed and compared gut microbiota between different groups in 3 stages. To evaluate the clinical outcome of treatment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin (HB), albumin (ALB), and Crohn's disease activity (CDAI) were recorded. . There are significant differences in microbiota between patients with CD and healthy people, and there are intuitive differences in the main components of the microbiota. 16 patients were included in stage 2, in which both corticosteroids and EEN can induce CD remission well. However, corticosteroids have a greater impact on inflammatory indicators, while EEN has a more obvious effect on nutritional indicators. Principal component analysis suggests that there are different compositional changes in the gut microbiome after corticosteroids and EEN treatment. After 3 months of dynamic observation, we found that EEN can effectively maintain CD remission, reduce inflammatory indicators, and improve nutritional indicators. . Both EEN and corticosteroids can increase the diversity of the microbiome in inducing CD remission, while they have different effects on the proportion of microbiome species. This trial is registered with NCT02056418.
本研究的目的是比较全肠内营养(EEN)和皮质类固醇对克罗恩病肠道微生物群的疗效。收集了16例新诊断为克罗恩病的患者作为试验组,以及10名健康志愿者作为对照组的数据。16例患者被随机分为EEN组和皮质类固醇组。为进行后续分析,纳入了EEN组中6例有随访的患者,以比较0个月、1个月和3个月时的结果。我们分3个阶段分析和比较了不同组之间的肠道微生物群。为评估治疗的临床结果,记录了红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血红蛋白(HB)、白蛋白(ALB)和克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)。克罗恩病患者与健康人之间的微生物群存在显著差异,微生物群的主要成分也存在直观差异。16例患者纳入第二阶段,在此阶段皮质类固醇和EEN均能很好地诱导克罗恩病缓解。然而,皮质类固醇对炎症指标影响更大,而EEN对营养指标的作用更明显。主成分分析表明,皮质类固醇和EEN治疗后肠道微生物群存在不同的组成变化。经过3个月的动态观察,我们发现EEN能有效维持克罗恩病缓解,降低炎症指标,改善营养指标。在诱导克罗恩病缓解方面,EEN和皮质类固醇均能增加微生物群的多样性,但它们对微生物物种比例的影响不同。本试验已在NCT02056418注册。