Liao Fang, Yu Shuangbin, Zhou Ying, Feng Benying
Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Key Laboratory of Psychosomatic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 22;12:862536. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.862536. eCollection 2022.
To explore the role of surgical treatment modality on prognosis of metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma (mEAC), as well as to construct a machine learning model to predict suitable candidates.
All mEAC patients pathologically diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A 1:4 propensity score-matched analysis and a multivariate Cox analysis were performed to verify the prognostic value of surgical treatment modality. To identify suitable candidates, a machine learning model, classification and regression tree (CART), was constructed, and its predictive performance was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Of 4520 mEAC patients, 2901 (64.2%) were aged over 60 years and 4012 (88.8%) were males. There were 411 (9.1%) patients receiving surgical treatment modality. In the propensity score-matched analysis, surgical treatment modality was significantly associated with a decreased risk of death (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.40-0.55); surgical patients had almost twice as much median survival time (MST) as those without resection (MST with 95% CI: 23 [17-27] months 11 [11-12] months, 0.0001). The similar association was also observed in the multivariate Cox analysis (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.41-0.53). Then, a CART was constructed to identify suitable candidates for surgical treatment modality, with a relatively good discrimination ability (AUC with 95% CI: 0.710 [0.648-0.771]).
Surgical treatment modality may be a promising strategy to prolong survival of mEAC patients. The CART in our study could serve as a useful tool to predict suitable candidates for surgical treatment modality. Further creditable studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
探讨手术治疗方式对转移性食管腺癌(mEAC)预后的作用,并构建机器学习模型以预测合适的候选患者。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中提取2010年1月至2018年12月间病理诊断的所有mEAC患者。进行1:4倾向评分匹配分析和多变量Cox分析,以验证手术治疗方式的预后价值。为了识别合适的候选患者,构建了一种机器学习模型——分类与回归树(CART),并通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估其预测性能。
4520例mEAC患者中,2901例(64.2%)年龄超过60岁,4012例(88.8%)为男性。411例(9.1%)患者接受了手术治疗方式。在倾向评分匹配分析中,手术治疗方式与死亡风险降低显著相关(HR:0.47,95%CI:0.40 - 0.55);手术患者的中位生存时间(MST)几乎是未切除患者的两倍(MST及95%CI:23[17 - 27]个月对11[11 - 12]个月,P = 0.0001)。在多变量Cox分析中也观察到类似的关联(HR:0.47,95%CI:0.41 - 0.53)。然后,构建了CART以识别适合手术治疗方式的候选患者,其具有相对较好的区分能力(AUC及95%CI:0.710[0.648 - 0.771])。
手术治疗方式可能是延长mEAC患者生存期的一种有前景的策略。我们研究中的CART可作为预测适合手术治疗方式候选患者的有用工具。需要进一步可靠的研究来证实我们的发现。