A comparison study of monoexponential and fractional order calculus diffusion models and F-FDG PET in differentiating benign and malignant solitary pulmonary lesions and their pathological types.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the application value of monoexponential, fractional order calculus (FROC) diffusion models and PET imaging to distinguish between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary lesions (SPLs) and malignant SPLs with different pathological types and explore the correlation between each parameter and Ki67 expression.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients were enrolled in this study. Prior to treatment, all patients underwent a dedicated thoracic F-FDG PET/MR examination. Five parameters [including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from the monoexponential model; diffusion coefficient (D), a microstructural quantity (μ), and fractional order parameter (β) derived from the FROC model and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) derived from PET] were compared between benign and malignant SPLs and different pathological types of malignant SPLs. Independent sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test, DeLong test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used for statistical evaluation. Pearson correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlations between Ki-67 and ADC, D, μ, β, and SUVmax.

RESULTS

The ADC and D values were significantly higher and the μ and SUVmax values were significantly lower in the benign group [1.57 (1.37, 2.05) μm/ms, 1.59 (1.52, 1.72) μm/ms, 5.06 (3.76, 5.66) μm, 5.15 ± 2.60] than in the malignant group [1.32 (1.03, 1.51) μm/ms, 1.43 (1.29, 1.52) μm/ms, 7.06 (5.87, 9.45) μm, 9.85 ± 4.95]. The ADC, D and β values were significantly lower and the μ and SUVmax values were significantly higher in the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) group [1.29 (0.66, 1.42) μm/ms, 1.32 (1.02, 1.42) μm/ms, 0.63 ± 0.10, 9.40 (7.76, 15.38) μm, 11.70 ± 5.98] than in the adenocarcinoma (AC) group [1.40 (1.28, 1.67) μm/ms, 1.52 (1.44, 1.64) μm/ms, 0.70 ± 0.10, 5.99 (4.54, 6.87) μm, 8.76 ± 4.18]. ROC curve analysis showed that for a single parameter, μ exhibited the best AUC value in discriminating between benign and malignant SPLs groups and AC and SCC groups (AUC = 0.824 and 0.911, respectively). Importantly, the combination of monoexponential, FROC models and PET imaging can further improve diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.872 and 0.922, respectively). The Pearson correlation analysis showed that Ki67 was positively correlated with μ value and negatively correlated with ADC and D values (r = 0.402, -0.346, -0.450, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The parameters D and μ derived from the FROC model were superior to ADC and SUVmax in distinguishing benign from malignant SPLs and adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma, in addition, the combination of multiple parameters can further improve diagnostic performance. The non-Gaussian FROC diffusion model is expected to become a noninvasive quantitative imaging technique for identifying SPLs.