• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于增强经骨等效肩袖修复的三脚架技术

Tripod Technique to Augment Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair.

作者信息

Gaukroger A, Arnander M, Pearse Y, Tennent D

机构信息

Shoulder Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, St. George's University Hospital NHS Trust, Tooting, UK.

出版信息

Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Jun 14;11(7):e1203-e1208. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.03.001. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.eats.2022.03.001
PMID:35936846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9353144/
Abstract

The transosseous-equivalent Speedbridge™ technique is commonly used during rotator cuff repair; however, the soft bone of the lateral humerus may result in toggling of the lateral row anchors with subsequent de-tensioning of the repair. The technique presented here uses an additional third-row anchor, in a tripod fashion, that reduces the forces on the lateral humerus anchors and protects the repair.

摘要

经骨等效Speedbridge™技术在肩袖修复术中常用；然而，肱骨外侧的软骨质可能导致外侧排锚钉松动，继而使修复处张力降低。本文介绍的技术采用额外的第三排锚钉，呈三脚架形式，可减少肱骨外侧锚钉上的受力并保护修复处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/5011e3abea2e/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/bd86fbe55bd9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/f4fd08b4d75d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/8e321f162bec/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/988a224846b2/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/022b9bce497d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/5011e3abea2e/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/bd86fbe55bd9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/f4fd08b4d75d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/8e321f162bec/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/988a224846b2/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/022b9bce497d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beff/9353144/5011e3abea2e/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Tripod Technique to Augment Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair.用于增强经骨等效肩袖修复的三脚架技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Jun 14;11(7):e1203-e1208. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.03.001. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
A biomechanical analysis of point of failure during lateral-row tensioning in transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair.经皮等长肩袖修复术中外侧排拉紧时失效点的生物力学分析。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
3
A laboratory comparison of a new arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair to a double row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.一项使用缝线锚钉将新型关节镜下经骨肩袖修复术与双排经骨等效肩袖修复术进行的实验室对比研究。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71(2):128-31.
4
Two Techniques for Treating Medium-Sized Supraspinatus Tears: The Medially Based Single-Row Technique and the Suture Bridge Technique.治疗中等大小冈上肌撕裂的两种技术：内侧单排技术和缝合桥技术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Jun 8;11(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00004. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
5
A novel transosseous button technique for rotator cuff repair.一种用于肩袖修复的新型经骨纽扣技术。
Arthroscopy. 2008 Sep;24(9):1074-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.014. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
6
Arthroscopic Knotless-Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下无结锚钉肩袖修复术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Sep 18;10(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00021. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
7
Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique.第一部分：与双排修复技术相比，一种经骨等效肩袖修复技术的足迹接触特征。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;16(4):461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.010. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
8
Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.肩袖修复的失败分析：三种双排技术的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1034-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00049.
9
Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: in vitro comparison of single-row suture anchor and transosseous tunnel constructs.巨大肩袖撕裂的初始固定强度：单排缝合锚钉与经骨隧道结构的体外比较
Arthroscopy. 2007 Jul;23(7):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.027.
10
Biomechanical Comparison of Transosseous Knotless Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Transosseous Equivalent Repair: Half The Anchors With Equivalent Biomechanics?经皮免打结与经皮等强度修复肩袖全层撕裂的生物力学比较：用一半锚钉达到等强度？
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.253. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review on the Double Pulley-Triple Row Technique for Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Repair.关于用于大到巨大肩袖损伤修复的双滑轮-三排技术的叙述性综述
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(3):359-371. doi: 10.4055/cios24424. Epub 2025 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of simple and complex single-row versus transosseous-equivalent double-row repair techniques for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全层肩袖撕裂的简单和复杂单排与经骨等效双排修复技术的比较：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JSES Int. 2021 Oct 26;6(1):70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.007. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Greater Tuberosity Bone Mineral Density and Rotator Cuff Tear Size Are Independent Factors Associated With Cutting-Through in Arthroscopic Suture-Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair.大结节骨密度和肩袖撕裂大小是与关节镜下缝合桥肩袖修复中“切通”相关的独立因素。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jul;37(7):2077-2086. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.059. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
The Effect of Patient Characteristics and Comorbidities on the Rate of Revision Rotator Cuff Repair.
患者特征和合并症对肩袖修复翻修率的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Sep;36(9):2380-2388. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Triple-Row Modification of the Suture-Bridge Technique for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.用于关节镜下肩袖修补的缝线桥技术的三排改良术
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Sep 5;5(5):e1007-e1013. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.05.004. eCollection 2016 Oct.
5
Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials.关节镜下单排与双排肩袖修复术后的临床和结构结果：I 级随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr;23(4):586-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.10.006. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
6
Does double-row rotator cuff repair improve functional outcome of patients compared with single-row technique? A systematic review.双排肩袖修复与单排技术相比是否能改善患者的功能预后？系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1176-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546511428866. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
7
Prospective randomized clinical trial of single- versus double-row suture anchor repair in 2- to 4-cm rotator cuff tears: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results.单排与双排缝线锚定修复 2-4cm 肩袖撕裂的前瞻性随机临床试验：临床和磁共振成像结果。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Apr;27(4):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.11.059.
8
Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.肩袖修复的失败分析：三种双排技术的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1034-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00049.
9
The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line.缝合锚钉的“死人理论”：沿德克萨斯州南部围栏线的观察
Arthroscopy. 1995 Feb;11(1):119-23. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90100-0.