Suppr超能文献

大鼠肝脏分离出的肝血窦膜和胆小管膜上胆汁酸结合情况的比较。

Comparison of bile acid binding to sinusoidal and bile canalicular membranes isolated from rat liver.

作者信息

Yachi K, Sugiyama Y, Iga T, Ikeda Y, Toda G, Hanano M

出版信息

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987 Jul 10;901(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90251-3.

Abstract

Simon et al. (J. Clin. Invest., 70 (1982) 401) studied cholate binding to crude liver plasma membrane vesicles and suggested that the binding may represent mainly the binding to the receptor (carrier) on the canalicular membrane. This hypothesis was supported by finding a good correlation between the number of cholate binding sites on liver plasma membrane and the maximal rate of biliary secretion (Tm) for taurocholate. We studied bile acid binding to sinusoidal and canalicular membrane vesicles isolated from rat liver by a rapid filtration technique. Scatchard analysis of the saturation kinetics showed both [3H]cholate and [3H]chenodeoxycholate bind to two classes of binding site on each membrane. However, little difference was observed between the binding to sinusoidal and canalicular membrane vesicles for each bile acid (cholate, Kd1 = 10.4 and 19.8 microM, n1 = 31.0 23.6 pmol/mg protein, Kd2 = 1.32 and 1.73 mM, n2 = 13.1 and 23.4 nmol/mg protein; and chenodeoxycholate, Kd1 = 0.207 and 0.328 microM, n1 = 36.7 and 27.4 pmol/mg protein, Kd2 = 1.16 and 2.26 mM, and n2 = 20.6 and 24.2 nmol/mg protein; numbers show the mean values sinusoidal and canalicular membrane vesicles, respectively). Chenodeoxycholate binding to sinusoidal membrane vesicles was markedly inhibited by cholate but not by Rose bengal, an organic anion dye. These studies indicate that both membranes (sinusoidal and canalicular membrane vesicles) have two kinds of binding site for bile acids, although no clear difference in the binding properties was observed between the two membranes. Consequently, the cholate binding Simon detected may represent the binding not only to canalicular membrane vesicles but also to sinusoidal membrane vesicles.

摘要

西蒙等人(《临床研究杂志》,70(1982)401)研究了胆酸盐与粗制肝细胞膜囊泡的结合,并提出这种结合可能主要代表与胆小管膜上受体(载体)的结合。肝细胞膜上胆酸盐结合位点的数量与牛磺胆酸盐的最大胆汁分泌速率(Tm)之间存在良好的相关性,这一发现支持了该假说。我们采用快速过滤技术研究了胆汁酸与从大鼠肝脏分离的窦状隙和胆小管膜囊泡的结合。对饱和动力学的斯卡查德分析表明,[3H]胆酸盐和[3H]鹅脱氧胆酸盐均与每种膜上的两类结合位点结合。然而,每种胆汁酸(胆酸盐,Kd1 = 10.4和19.8微摩尔,n1 = 31.0和23.6皮摩尔/毫克蛋白质,Kd2 = 1.32和1.73毫摩尔,n2 = 13.1和23.4纳摩尔/毫克蛋白质;鹅脱氧胆酸盐,Kd1 = 0.207和0.328微摩尔,n1 = 36.7和27.4皮摩尔/毫克蛋白质,Kd2 = 1.16和2.26毫摩尔,n2 = 20.6和24.2纳摩尔/毫克蛋白质;数字分别显示窦状隙和胆小管膜囊泡的平均值)与窦状隙和胆小管膜囊泡的结合之间观察到的差异很小。鹅脱氧胆酸盐与窦状隙膜囊泡的结合受到胆酸盐的显著抑制,但不受有机阴离子染料孟加拉玫瑰红的抑制。这些研究表明,两种膜(窦状隙和胆小管膜囊泡)都有两类胆汁酸结合位点,尽管在两种膜之间未观察到结合特性的明显差异。因此,西蒙检测到的胆酸盐结合可能不仅代表与胆小管膜囊泡的结合,也代表与窦状隙膜囊泡的结合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验