• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黑人不孕症与社交媒体参与度:一项混合方法分析

Black infertility and social media engagement: a mixed methodology analysis.

作者信息

Rasouli Melody Ava, Sagun Benette Krizel, Verma Kajal, Duke Cindy M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, Nevada.

Nevada Fertility Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada.

出版信息

F S Rep. 2021 Nov 13;3(2 Suppl):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.11.005. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.xfre.2021.11.005
PMID:35937449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349246/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study social media engagement on Black infertility to better understand why there is lower utilization of in vitro fertilization by Black women despite higher infertility rates.

DESIGN

The online analytics module BuzzSumo was used to quantify total engagements with the search term "Black infertility" across the commonly used social media platforms. The 10 article links with the highest engagement were selected from periods in 2020 and 2021. Sources cited in each article were reviewed to identify those that had citations of scientific peer-reviewed journals or national medical organizations. The contents of each article were reviewed for accuracy by comparing the article information against available scientific research and consensus data.

PATIENTS

Not applicable.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable.

RESULTS

After applying the exclusion criteria, nine article links remained in each date range. The highest engagement with the term "Black infertility" was found on Facebook for both 2020 and 2021. Ten percent of content regarding Black infertility in 2020 compared with 50% of content regarding Black infertility in 2021 referenced original studies in peer-reviewed journals. Links with greater social engagement were more likely to have academic sources in 2021 than in 2020 (odds ratio, 1.30). The highest user engagement was found for articles discussing the emotional toll of Black infertility.

CONCLUSIONS

Social media users encounter misleading or inaccurate information regarding Black fertility at similar rates to accurate content. Social media can propagate misinformation, and this study identifies social media as an opportunity to improve education directed toward Black women to increase the utilization of in vitro fertilization services.

摘要

目的

研究社交媒体上关于黑人不孕症的参与情况,以更好地理解为何黑人女性不孕症发生率较高,但体外受精的利用率却较低。

设计

使用在线分析模块BuzzSumo对常用社交媒体平台上与搜索词“黑人不孕症”的总参与度进行量化。从2020年和2021年期间选出参与度最高的10篇文章链接。对每篇文章中引用的来源进行审查,以确定那些引用了科学同行评审期刊或国家医学组织的内容。通过将文章信息与现有的科学研究和共识数据进行比较,对每篇文章的内容准确性进行审查。

患者

不适用。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

不适用。

结果

应用排除标准后,每个日期范围内均保留9篇文章链接。2020年和2021年在Facebook上发现与“黑人不孕症”一词的参与度最高。2020年关于黑人不孕症的内容中有10%引用了同行评审期刊中的原始研究,而2021年这一比例为50%。与2020年相比,2021年社交参与度更高的链接更有可能有学术来源(优势比,1.30)。讨论黑人不孕症情感代价的文章用户参与度最高。

结论

社交媒体用户接触到关于黑人生育的误导性或不准确信息的比例与准确内容相似。社交媒体可能传播错误信息,本研究将社交媒体视为一个机会,以改善针对黑人女性的教育,提高体外受精服务的利用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe89/9349246/c4ee57878f2b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe89/9349246/c4ee57878f2b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe89/9349246/c4ee57878f2b/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Black infertility and social media engagement: a mixed methodology analysis.黑人不孕症与社交媒体参与度:一项混合方法分析
F S Rep. 2021 Nov 13;3(2 Suppl):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.11.005. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Social media engagement with transgender fertility content.社交媒体对跨性别者生育相关内容的参与度。
F S Rep. 2021 Dec 18;3(2 Suppl):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.12.005. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Social Media Sensationalism in the Male Infertility Space: A Mixed Methodology Analysis.男性不育领域的社交媒体轰动效应:一项混合方法分析。
World J Mens Health. 2020 Oct;38(4):591-598. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200009. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
Engagement of common pediatric urologic conditions on social media.社交媒体上常见小儿泌尿科疾病的参与情况。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Apr;18(2):236.e1-236.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
5
Contextualizing Engagement With Health Information on Facebook: Using the Social Media Content and Context Elicitation Method.将在脸书上获取健康信息的行为置于情境中:运用社交媒体内容与情境引出法
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 4;24(3):e25243. doi: 10.2196/25243.
6
Health Information in the Era of Social Media: An Analysis of the Nature and Accuracy of Posts Made by Public Facebook Pages for Patients with Endometriosis.社交媒体时代的健康信息:对子宫内膜异位症患者公共 Facebook 页面发布内容的性质和准确性的分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1637-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
8
Social media engagement, perpetuating selected information, and accuracy regarding CA SB-201: Treatment or intervention on the sex characteristics of a minor.社交媒体参与、选择性信息传播以及对 CA SB-201 的准确性:对未成年人的性别特征进行治疗或干预。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):372-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.047. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
9
'Fake News' in urology: evaluating the accuracy of articles shared on social media in genitourinary malignancies.泌尿外科领域的“假新闻”:评估社交媒体上分享的关于泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤文章的准确性
BJU Int. 2019 Oct;124(4):701-706. doi: 10.1111/bju.14787. Epub 2019 May 13.
10
Online reach and engagement of a child nutrition peer-education program (PICNIC): insights from social media and web analytics.儿童营养同伴教育计划(PICNIC)的在线覆盖范围和参与度:社交媒体和网络分析的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13252-3.

引用本文的文献

1
HPV vaccine-related articles shared on Facebook from 2019 to 2021: Did COVID make a difference?2019年至2021年在脸书上分享的与人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗相关的文章:新冠疫情有影响吗?
PEC Innov. 2024 Jun 4;4:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100301. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US.美国接受辅助生殖技术的黑人和白人女性之间存在种族差异的现状。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Nov 19;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00662-4.
2
COVID-19 misinformation: Accuracy of articles about coronavirus prevention mostly shared on social media.新冠疫情不实信息:社交媒体上大量分享的有关冠状病毒预防的文章的准确性。
Health Policy Technol. 2021 Mar;10(1):182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
3
Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of infertile couples.
COVID-19 大流行对不孕夫妇心理状况的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
4
Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.医患种族一致性与新生儿分娩死亡率的差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 1;117(35):21194-21200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913405117. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
5
The pervasive issue of racism and its impact on infertility patients: what can we do as reproductive endocrinologists?普遍存在的种族主义问题及其对不孕患者的影响:作为生殖内分泌学家,我们能做些什么?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jul;37(7):1563-1565. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01863-x. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
6
Infertility knowledge and treatment beliefs among African American women in an urban community.城市社区中非洲裔美国女性的不孕知识与治疗观念
Contracept Reprod Med. 2019 Sep 24;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40834-019-0097-x. eCollection 2019.
7
Infertility-Related Stress and Psychological Health Outcomes in Infertile Couples Undergoing Medical Treatments: Testing a Multi-dimensional Model.不孕相关压力与接受医学治疗的不孕夫妇的心理健康结局:检验多维模型。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Dec;27(4):662-676. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09653-z.
8
'Fake News' in urology: evaluating the accuracy of articles shared on social media in genitourinary malignancies.泌尿外科领域的“假新闻”:评估社交媒体上分享的关于泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤文章的准确性
BJU Int. 2019 Oct;124(4):701-706. doi: 10.1111/bju.14787. Epub 2019 May 13.
9
Infertility, Inequality, and How Lack of Insurance Coverage Compromises Reproductive Autonomy.不孕症、不平等以及保险覆盖范围的缺失如何损害生殖自主权。
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):E1152-1159. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.1152.
10
Infertile women who screen positive for depression are less likely to initiate fertility treatments.抑郁症筛查呈阳性的不孕女性开始接受生育治疗的可能性较小。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):582-587. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew351.