• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国个人社会经济剥夺指数(USiDep)

The United States index of socioeconomic deprivation for individuals (USiDep).

作者信息

Dunlop Boadie W, Rakofsky Jeffrey J, Mischoulon David, Mayberg Helen S, Kinkead Becky, Nierenberg Andrew A, Ziegler Thomas R, Fava Maurizio, Rapaport Mark H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, 12 Executive Park Drive NE, 3rd Floor Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Pers Med Psychiatry. 2022 Mar-Apr;31-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pmip.2022.100091. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmip.2022.100091
PMID:35937504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9355266/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals experiencing socioeconomic deprivation consistently demonstrate poorer physical and mental health. Income alone is inadequate as a measure of socioeconomic status (SES); a better measure for assessing the deprivation status of individuals is needed.

METHODS

The New Zealand Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation for Individuals, a validated, eight-item measure of deprivation, was modified to create the United States Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation for Individuals (USiDep). The questionnaire was administered to patients with major depressive disorder participating in two clinical trials. Spearman's correlation coefficients evaluated associations between USiDep scores with income and other measures associated with deprivation.

RESULTS

The USiDep was completed by 118 participants, demonstrating adequate internal consistency (Crohnbach's alpha = 0.766) and strong item-total correlations. USiDep scores were moderately correlated with past-year personal income (Spearman's rho = -0.362, p < .001) and several other measures related to deprivation, including body mass index, level of education, quality of life, severity of childhood traumatic events, self-reported physical health, and negative life events. Patients scoring 5 on the USiDep (the highest possible score, indicating greater deprivation) had significantly lower rates of remission after 12 weeks of treatment than those scoring ≤ 4 (1/12, 8.3% vs 40/98, 40.8%, respectively, p = .03), whereas the lowest income group showed no significant associations with outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The USiDep is a valid, brief questionnaire for assessing SES that has utility for clinical research and may serve as a predictor of treatment outcomes in clinical trials. Validation of the USiDep in healthy controls and other medically and psychiatrically ill populations is warranted.

摘要

背景

经历社会经济剥夺的个体一直表现出较差的身心健康状况。仅收入不足以作为社会经济地位(SES)的衡量标准;需要一种更好的方法来评估个体的剥夺状况。

方法

对经过验证的、包含八个项目的个体社会经济剥夺新西兰指数进行修改,以创建个体社会经济剥夺美国指数(USiDep)。该问卷被施用于参与两项临床试验的重度抑郁症患者。斯皮尔曼相关系数评估了USiDep分数与收入以及其他与剥夺相关的指标之间的关联。

结果

118名参与者完成了USiDep问卷,显示出足够的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.766)和较强的项目与总分相关性。USiDep分数与过去一年的个人收入(斯皮尔曼相关系数ρ = -0.362,p <.001)以及其他一些与剥夺相关的指标存在中度相关性,这些指标包括体重指数、教育水平、生活质量、童年创伤事件的严重程度、自我报告的身体健康状况以及负面生活事件。在USiDep上得分为5分(可能的最高分,表明剥夺程度更高)的患者在治疗12周后的缓解率显著低于得分≤4分的患者(分别为1/12,8.3% 对40/98,40.8%,p =.03),而收入最低的组与治疗结果无显著关联。

结论

USiDep是一种有效的简短问卷,用于评估SES,对临床研究有用,并且可能作为临床试验中治疗结果的预测指标。有必要在健康对照以及其他患有医学和精神疾病的人群中对USiDep进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d5f/9355266/1fa8193b2c3b/nihms-1771841-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d5f/9355266/c2d47093dda6/nihms-1771841-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d5f/9355266/1fa8193b2c3b/nihms-1771841-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d5f/9355266/c2d47093dda6/nihms-1771841-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d5f/9355266/1fa8193b2c3b/nihms-1771841-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The United States index of socioeconomic deprivation for individuals (USiDep).美国个人社会经济剥夺指数(USiDep)
Pers Med Psychiatry. 2022 Mar-Apr;31-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pmip.2022.100091. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
How Should We Measure Social Deprivation in Orthopaedic Patients?我们应该如何衡量骨科患者的社会剥夺程度?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Feb 1;480(2):325-339. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002044.
4
Does relative deprivation predict the need for mental health services?相对剥夺感能否预测心理健康服务需求?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2004 Dec;7(4):167-75.
5
[Health-related quality of life assessment in depression after low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation].[低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗后抑郁症患者的健康相关生活质量评估]
Encephale. 2014 Feb;40(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
6
Socioeconomic Deprivation, Sleep Duration, and Mental Health during the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.社会经济剥夺、睡眠时间与新冠大流行第一年的心理健康。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;19(21):14367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114367.
7
Independent and combined influence of homeownership, occupation, education, income, and community poverty on physical health in persons with arthritis.拥有住房、职业、教育、收入以及社区贫困对关节炎患者身体健康的独立和综合影响。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 May;63(5):643-53. doi: 10.1002/acr.20428.
8
Are Commonly Used Geographically Based Social Determinant of Health Indices in Orthopaedic Surgery Research Correlated With Each Other and With PROMIS Global-10 Physical and Mental Health Scores?骨科手术研究中常用的基于地理位置的社会健康决定因素指标彼此之间以及与 PROMIS 全球 10 项身心健康评分相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 1;482(4):604-614. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002896. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
9
Did the Physical and Mental Health of Orthopaedic Patients Change After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic?骨科患者在 COVID-19 大流行开始后身心健康状况是否发生了变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):935-944. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002555. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
10
Validity and Internal Consistency of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.新版膝关节协会膝关节评分系统的效度与内部一致性
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000014.

引用本文的文献

1
The status of Saudi measures of deprivation: A review with policy recommendations on a missing indicator in Saudi epidemiologic research.沙特剥夺措施的现状:对沙特流行病学研究中一个缺失指标的综述及政策建议
J Family Community Med. 2025 Jul-Sep;32(3):179-185. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_331_24. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
A dataset of risky and ambiguous decisions using a novel Linked Colored Lottery Task across two studies.一项跨越两项研究、使用新颖的关联彩色彩票任务的风险和模糊决策数据集。
Data Brief. 2025 Jun 27;61:111844. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111844. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Cardiovascular Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Major Depressive Disorder With High Inflammation: A Randomized Dose-Finding Clinical Trial.ω-3 脂肪酸治疗伴有高度炎症的重性抑郁症:一项随机剂量探索性临床试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 22;83(5):21m14074. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m14074.
2
Establishing Evidence for Clinical Utility of a Neuroimaging Biomarker in Major Depressive Disorder: Prospective Testing and Implementation Challenges.确立神经影像学生物标志物在重度抑郁症临床应用中的证据:前瞻性测试与实施挑战
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 15;90(4):236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.02.966. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
3
Dose- and time-dependent increase in circulating anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving lipid mediators following eicosapentaenoic acid supplementation in patients with major depressive disorder and chronic inflammation.
健康的社会决定因素对心血管疾病的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e039031. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039031.
4
Racial/ethnic disparities in chronic wounds: Perspectives on linking upstream factors to health outcomes.慢性伤口中的种族/民族差异:将上游因素与健康结果联系起来的观点。
Wound Repair Regen. 2024 Sep-Oct;32(5):770-779. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13200. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
5
Impact of health disparities on national breast cancer screening participation rates in South Korea.健康差距对韩国国家乳腺癌筛查参与率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40164-y.
6
The role of social deprivation and depression in dementia risk: findings from the longitudinal survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe.社会剥夺和抑郁在痴呆风险中的作用:来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休纵向调查的发现。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2023 Feb 14;32:e10. doi: 10.1017/S2045796023000033.
在患有重度抑郁症和慢性炎症的患者中,补充二十碳五烯酸后,循环中抗炎和促解决的脂质介质呈剂量和时间依赖性增加。
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2021 Jan;164:102219. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2020.102219. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
4
Premature mortality attributable to socioeconomic inequality in England between 2003 and 2018: an observational study.2003 年至 2018 年英格兰因社会经济不平等导致的过早死亡:观察性研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jan;5(1):e33-e41. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30219-1. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
Adverse impact of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation on psychological treatment outcomes: the role of area-level income and crime.邻里社会经济剥夺对心理治疗结果的不利影响:地区收入和犯罪的作用。
Psychother Res. 2020 Apr;30(4):546-554. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1649500. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Prevalence of low-grade inflammation in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of CRP levels.抑郁症中低度炎症的流行情况:CRP 水平的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2019 Sep;49(12):1958-1970. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001454. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
Childhood socioeconomic status and inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童社会经济地位与炎症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Behav Immun. 2019 May;78:161-176. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
8
Social Determinants of Mental Health: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.社会决定因素与心理健康:现状与展望。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Sep 17;20(11):95. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0969-9.
9
Associations between socioeconomic status and psychological therapy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.社会经济地位与心理治疗结果的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jun;35(6):560-573. doi: 10.1002/da.22765. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Income inequality and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and a scoping review of mechanisms.收入不平等与抑郁症:关联的系统评价与荟萃分析以及机制的范围综述
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):76-89. doi: 10.1002/wps.20492.