Nummi Vuokko, Lehtinen Anna-Elina, Iorio Alfonso, Szanto Timea, Lassila Riitta
Department of Hematology, Coagulation Disorders Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Haemophilia. 2022 Nov;28(6):e237-e244. doi: 10.1111/hae.14649. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Majority of haemophilia A patients in our comprehensive care centre have switched from standard half-life (SHL) to extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products in a short time.
We compared the clinical and laboratory outcomes between SHL and EHL FVIII prophylaxis in product switchers.
This is a retrospective inception cohort of all adult haemophilia A patients switched to EHL (rFVIIIFc or rFVIII-PEG) prophylaxis in our centre. Dosing, product utilization, annualized bleed rates (ABR), treatment regimen and pharmacokinetics by Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service (WAPPS)-Hemo were compared between SHL and EHL.
We included 38 patients, whose median age was 38 years (range 17-75). Median FVIII dose was 23 IU/kg for SHL versus 25 IU/kg for EHL. After switching, weekly infusions decreased by 29% from median 2.8 (every 2.5 days) to 2.0 (every 3.5 days) (P = <.001) and factor consumption for prophylaxis by 17% from 60 to 50 IU/kg/week (P = <.001). Weekly infusions decreased in 71% and FVIII utilization in 55% of patients. ABR remained low (1.0 for SHL and .5 for EHL, respectively). In pharmacokinetics, the half-life of FVIII increased from median 13 to 21 h after switching. Times above .01 and .03 IU/ml improved from 85 to 131 h and from 65 to 106 h. Half-lives of the SHL products and von Willebrand factor levels predicted half-lives with the EHL products.
Our cohort study confirms the successful experience of switching to EHL FVIII products, with decreased infusion frequency, factor consumption and excellent clinical efficacy.
我们综合护理中心的大多数甲型血友病患者在短时间内已从标准半衰期(SHL)FVIII产品转换为延长半衰期(EHL)FVIII产品。
我们比较了产品转换者中SHL和EHL FVIII预防治疗的临床和实验室结果。
这是一项回顾性起始队列研究,纳入了我们中心所有转换为EHL(重组FVIII-Fc或重组FVIII-PEG)预防治疗的成年甲型血友病患者。比较了SHL和EHL之间的剂量、产品使用情况、年化出血率(ABR)、治疗方案以及通过网络可及群体药代动力学服务(WAPPS)-Hemo得出的药代动力学。
我们纳入了38名患者,中位年龄为38岁(范围17 - 75岁)。SHL的FVIII中位剂量为23 IU/kg,而EHL为25 IU/kg。转换后,每周输注次数从中位值2.8次(每2.5天一次)减少了29%至2.0次(每3.5天一次)(P = <.001),预防治疗的因子消耗量从60 IU/kg/周减少了17%至50 IU/kg/周(P = <.001)。71%的患者每周输注次数减少,55%的患者FVIII使用量减少。ABR仍然较低(SHL为1.0,EHL为0.5)。在药代动力学方面,转换后FVIII的半衰期从中位值13小时增加到21小时。高于0.01和0.03 IU/ml的时间分别从85小时改善到131小时以及从65小时改善到106小时。SHL产品的半衰期和血管性血友病因子水平可预测EHL产品的半衰期。
我们的队列研究证实了转换为EHL FVIII产品的成功经验,输注频率降低、因子消耗量减少且临床疗效优异。