Patterson Joseph T, Wier Julian, Gary Joshua L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Oct 19;104(20):1821-1829. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00252. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
Patients with traumatic pelvic ring injury may present with hypotension secondary to hemorrhage. Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) and angioembolization (AE) are alternative interventions for management of hypotension associated with pelvic ring injury refractory to resuscitation and circumferential compression. We hypothesized that PPP may be independently associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with AE in patients with hypotension and pelvic ring injury.
Adult patients with pelvic ring injury and hypotension managed with PPP or AE were retrospectively identified in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2015 to 2019. Patients were matched on a propensity score for receiving PPP based on patient, injury, and treatment factors. The primary outcome was the risk of VTE after matching on the propensity score for treatment. The secondary outcomes included inpatient clinically important deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, mortality, unplanned reoperation, sepsis, surgical site infection, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay.
In this study, 502 patients treated with PPP and 2,439 patients treated with AE met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching on age, smoking status, Injury Severity Score, Tile B or C pelvic ring injury, bilateral femoral fracture, serious head injury, units of plasma and platelets given within 4 hours of admission, laparotomy, and level-I trauma center facility designation, 183 patients treated with PPP and 183 patients treated with AE remained. PPP, compared with AE, was associated with a 9.8% greater absolute risk of VTE, 6.5% greater risk of clinically important deep vein thrombosis, and 4.9% greater risk of respiratory failure after propensity score matching.
PPP for the management of hypotension associated with pelvic ring injury is associated with higher rates of inpatient VTE events and sequelae compared with AE.
Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
创伤性骨盆环损伤患者可能因出血而出现低血压。腹膜前骨盆填塞(PPP)和血管栓塞术(AE)是用于治疗复苏和环周压迫难治的与骨盆环损伤相关的低血压的替代干预措施。我们假设,在伴有低血压和骨盆环损伤的患者中,与AE相比,PPP可能独立增加静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险。
2015年至2019年在创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)数据库中对接受PPP或AE治疗的成年骨盆环损伤和低血压患者进行回顾性识别。根据患者、损伤和治疗因素,对接受PPP的倾向评分进行患者匹配。主要结局是在对治疗倾向评分进行匹配后发生VTE的风险。次要结局包括住院期间临床上重要的深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、呼吸衰竭、死亡率、计划外再次手术、脓毒症、手术部位感染、住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间。
在本研究中,502例接受PPP治疗的患者和2439例接受AE治疗的患者符合纳入标准。在对年龄、吸烟状况、损伤严重程度评分、Tile B或C型骨盆环损伤、双侧股骨骨折、严重颅脑损伤、入院后4小时内输注的血浆和血小板单位、剖腹手术以及一级创伤中心设施指定进行倾向评分匹配后,仍有183例接受PPP治疗的患者和183例接受AE治疗的患者。倾向评分匹配后,与AE相比,PPP发生VTE的绝对风险高9.8%,临床上重要的深静脉血栓形成风险高6.5%,呼吸衰竭风险高4.9%。
与AE相比,用于治疗与骨盆环损伤相关的低血压的PPP与住院VTE事件及其后遗症的发生率更高相关。
预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。