Viral Core Facility, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Viral Core Facility, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
J Virol Methods. 2022 Nov;309:114598. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114598. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) have long been one of the most common and versatile vectors for in vitro and in vivo gene transfer. AAV production protocols are complex and time consuming, one key concern is the recovery and infectivity of viral vector after purification. The buffer used in the storage of AAV at 4 °C and - 80 °C is a crucial factor and methods to improve it have been thoroughly investigated. Viral core facilities have developed formulas using either 0.001% Pluronic F68 or 5% sorbitol in their storage buffers based on the results of this research. Interestingly, few use formulations that include both a non-ionic surfactant and cryopreservative. In this study, AAV9 stored at 4 °C and at - 80 °C in the standard buffers is compared to a buffer that contains 5% glycerol and 0.001% Pluronic F68. By viral genome quantitation with qPCR, all three formulations show the same extent of viral titer loss at 4 °C, while after several cycles of freeze/thaws at - 80 °C, the viral recovery and infectivity in the preparation with both glycerol and Pluronic F68 was most stable compared to the other buffers.
腺相关病毒(AAV)一直是体外和体内基因转移最常用和最通用的载体之一。AAV 生产方案复杂且耗时,一个关键问题是病毒载体在纯化后的回收和感染力。4°C 和-80°C 下储存 AAV 时使用的缓冲液是一个关键因素,已经对其改进方法进行了深入研究。病毒核心设施根据该研究的结果,使用含有 0.001%普朗尼克 F68 或 5%山梨醇的配方开发了储存缓冲液。有趣的是,很少有使用包含非离子表面活性剂和冷冻保护剂的配方。在这项研究中,比较了在标准缓冲液中于 4°C 和-80°C 储存的 AAV9 与含有 5%甘油和 0.001%普朗尼克 F68 的缓冲液。通过 qPCR 进行病毒基因组定量,所有三种配方在 4°C 时都显示出相同程度的病毒滴度损失,而在-80°C 下多次冻融循环后,与其他缓冲液相比,含有甘油和普朗尼克 F68 的制剂中的病毒回收率和感染力最稳定。