Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e2197-e2207. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac232.
Active duty service members transitioning to civilian life can experience significant readjustment stressors. Over the past two decades of the United States' longest sustained conflict, reducing transitioning veterans' suicidal behavior and homelessness became national priorities. However, it remains a significant challenge to identify which service members are at greatest risk of these post-active duty outcomes. Discharge characterization, which indicates the quality of an individual's military service and affects eligibility for benefits and services at the Department of Veterans Affairs, is a potentially important indicator of risk.
This study used data from two self-report panel surveys of the Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers-Longitudinal Study (STARRS-LS) (LS1: 2016-2018, n = 14,508; and LS2: 2018-2019, n = 12,156), which were administered to respondents who previously participated while on active duty in one of the three Army STARRS baseline self-report surveys (2011-2014): the New Soldier Study (NSS), a survey of soldiers entering basic training; All Army Study, a survey of active duty soldiers around the world; and the Pre-Post Deployment Study, a survey of soldiers before and after combat deployment. Human Subjects Committees of the participating institutions approved all recruitment, informed consent, and data collection protocols. We used modified Poisson regression models to prospectively examine the association of discharge characterization (honorable, general, "bad paper" [other than honorable, bad conduct, dishonorable], and uncharacterized [due to separation within the first 180 days of service]) with suicide attempt (subsample of n = 4334 observations) and homelessness (subsample of n = 6837 observations) among those no longer on active duty (i.e., separated or deactivated). Analyses controlled for other suicide attempt and homelessness risk factors using standardized risk indices that were previously developed using the LS survey data.
Twelve-month prevalence rates of self-reported suicide attempts and homelessness in the total pooled LS sample were 1.0% and 2.9%, respectively. While not associated with suicide attempt risk, discharge characterization was associated with homelessness after controlling for other risk factors. Compared to soldiers with an honorable discharge, those with a bad paper discharge had an increased risk of homelessness in the total sample (relative risk [RR] = 4.4 [95% CI = 2.3-8.4]), as well as within subsamples defined by which baseline survey respondents completed (NSS vs. All Army Study/Pre-Post Deployment Study), whether respondents had been separated (vs. deactivated), and how much time had elapsed since respondents were last on active duty.
There is a robust association between receiving a bad paper discharge and post-separation/deactivation homelessness. Policies that enhance transition assistance and access to mental healthcare for high-risk soldiers may aid in reducing post-separation/deactivation homelessness among those who do not receive an honorable discharge.
现役军人过渡到平民生活可能会经历重大的调整压力。在过去二十年美国持续时间最长的冲突中,减少退伍军人的自杀行为和无家可归问题已成为国家优先事项。然而,确定哪些军人面临这些现役后结果的风险最大仍然是一个重大挑战。退役特征表明个人的军事服务质量,并影响在退伍军人事务部获得福利和服务的资格,这是一个潜在的重要风险指标。
本研究使用了评估服务人员风险和适应能力纵向研究(STARRS-LS)的两项自我报告面板调查(LS1:2016-2018 年,n=14508;和 LS2:2018-2019 年,n=12156)的数据,这些数据是对以前在陆军 STARRS 三项基线自我报告调查(2011-2014 年)中现役的参与者进行的:新兵研究(NSS),对新兵进行的一项调查;陆军全军研究,对全球现役士兵进行的一项调查;和部署前/部署后研究,对参战前/参战后的士兵进行的一项调查。参与机构的人类受试者委员会批准了所有的招募、知情同意和数据收集协议。我们使用修正后的泊松回归模型,前瞻性地研究了退役特征(荣誉、一般、“不良记录”(非荣誉、不良行为、不名誉)和未定性(由于服务的前 180 天内分离)与自杀企图(亚组 n=4334 次观察)和无家可归(亚组 n=6837 次观察)之间的关系,这些关系在现役军人(即分离或停役)中不再存在。分析使用了先前使用 LS 调查数据开发的标准化风险指数,控制了其他自杀企图和无家可归风险因素。
在总 LS 样本中,自我报告的自杀企图和无家可归的 12 个月患病率分别为 1.0%和 2.9%。虽然与自杀企图风险无关,但在控制其他风险因素后,退役特征与无家可归有关。与获得荣誉退伍的士兵相比,那些获得不良记录退伍的士兵在总样本中无家可归的风险增加(相对风险[RR] = 4.4 [95%CI = 2.3-8.4]),以及在根据基线调查受访者完成情况定义的亚组中(NSS 与陆军全军研究/部署前/部署后研究),受访者是否被分离(与停役),以及受访者最后一次现役的时间长短。
获得不良记录退伍与分离/停役后无家可归之间存在很强的关联。增强对高危士兵的过渡援助和获得心理健康护理的政策,可能有助于减少那些没有获得荣誉退伍的士兵的分离/停役后无家可归。