Suppr超能文献

主动式格斗运动运动员前庭/眼动筛查评估的评估:一项探索性研究。

Evaluation of the vestibular/ocular motor screening assessment in active combat sport athletes: an exploratory study.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Nathan, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2022 Jul 3;36(8):961-967. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2109741. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The first aim of this study was to compare the results of the vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) in combat sport athletes with a healthy control population. Second, to explore differences between athletes with and without a concussion history. Third, to examine the relationship between VOMS and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) in combat sport athletes.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty active male combat sport athletes and 40 healthy male control participants were recruited from 4 clubs and a University in Australia.

METHODS

Participants completed the VOMS in a primary care physiotherapy clinic. Participants completed an injury questionnaire and the PCSS.

RESULTS

An "abnormal" score in at least one subtest or near point convergence (NPC) was recorded in 45% of the combat group compared with 22.5% of the control group. All VOMS scores and NPC distance were greater in the combat group compared with control group ( < 0.05). The VOMS scores were found to be moderately positively correlated with the PCSS. There was no difference in VOMS between athletes with and without a history of concussion ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

VOMS scores differed between combat sport athletes and control participants. The PCSS may aid clinicians in identifying athletes who have underlying vestibular/oculomotor impairment.

摘要

目的

本研究的首要目的是比较竞技运动运动员与健康对照组的前庭/眼动筛查(VOMS)结果。其次,探索有无脑震荡史运动员之间的差异。第三,研究竞技运动运动员的 VOMS 与脑震荡后症状量表(PCSS)之间的关系。

参与者

40 名现役男性竞技运动运动员和 40 名健康男性对照组参与者从澳大利亚的 4 个俱乐部和 1 所大学招募而来。

方法

参与者在初级保健理疗诊所完成 VOMS。参与者完成了一份损伤问卷和 PCSS。

结果

与对照组的 22.5%相比,在竞技组中有 45%记录到至少一个子测试或近点集合(NPC)异常评分。与对照组相比,竞技组的所有 VOMS 评分和 NPC 距离均更大(<0.05)。VOMS 评分与 PCSS 呈中度正相关。有无脑震荡史的运动员之间的 VOMS 评分无差异(>0.05)。

结论

VOMS 评分在竞技运动运动员和对照组参与者之间存在差异。PCSS 可能有助于临床医生识别存在潜在前庭/眼动障碍的运动员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验