School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Nathan, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Brain Inj. 2022 Jul 3;36(8):961-967. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2109741. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
The first aim of this study was to compare the results of the vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) in combat sport athletes with a healthy control population. Second, to explore differences between athletes with and without a concussion history. Third, to examine the relationship between VOMS and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) in combat sport athletes.
Forty active male combat sport athletes and 40 healthy male control participants were recruited from 4 clubs and a University in Australia.
Participants completed the VOMS in a primary care physiotherapy clinic. Participants completed an injury questionnaire and the PCSS.
An "abnormal" score in at least one subtest or near point convergence (NPC) was recorded in 45% of the combat group compared with 22.5% of the control group. All VOMS scores and NPC distance were greater in the combat group compared with control group ( < 0.05). The VOMS scores were found to be moderately positively correlated with the PCSS. There was no difference in VOMS between athletes with and without a history of concussion ( > 0.05).
VOMS scores differed between combat sport athletes and control participants. The PCSS may aid clinicians in identifying athletes who have underlying vestibular/oculomotor impairment.
本研究的首要目的是比较竞技运动运动员与健康对照组的前庭/眼动筛查(VOMS)结果。其次,探索有无脑震荡史运动员之间的差异。第三,研究竞技运动运动员的 VOMS 与脑震荡后症状量表(PCSS)之间的关系。
40 名现役男性竞技运动运动员和 40 名健康男性对照组参与者从澳大利亚的 4 个俱乐部和 1 所大学招募而来。
参与者在初级保健理疗诊所完成 VOMS。参与者完成了一份损伤问卷和 PCSS。
与对照组的 22.5%相比,在竞技组中有 45%记录到至少一个子测试或近点集合(NPC)异常评分。与对照组相比,竞技组的所有 VOMS 评分和 NPC 距离均更大(<0.05)。VOMS 评分与 PCSS 呈中度正相关。有无脑震荡史的运动员之间的 VOMS 评分无差异(>0.05)。
VOMS 评分在竞技运动运动员和对照组参与者之间存在差异。PCSS 可能有助于临床医生识别存在潜在前庭/眼动障碍的运动员。