Lechien Jerome R, Hans Stephane, Vaira Luigi A, Boscolo-Rizzo Paolo, De Marrez Lisa G, Baudouin Robin, Gheorghe Alexandrea, Sebestyen Andra, Loubieres Charlotte, Karkos Petros D, Saussez Sven
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar;168(3):366-371. doi: 10.1177/01945998221117469. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
To psychophysically evaluate olfaction in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).
Prospective controlled study.
Tertiary medical center.
From January 2021 to January 2022, patients with LPR diagnosed with hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring underwent psychophysical evaluation of the sense of smell. Reflux symptoms and findings were assessed with the Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA). Nasal symptoms were assessed through the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22). From pre- to posttreatment, patients underwent identification Sniffin' Sticks test and olfactory cleft examination. Clinical outcomes were compared between LPR patients and healthy individuals.
In total, 107 patients and 76 healthy individuals completed the evaluations. LPR patients reported significant higher RSS, RSA, and SNOT-22 scores. Psychophysical olfactory evaluations were significantly lower in reflux patients compared with controls, while there were no significant differences in olfactory cleft score. RSS and RSA significantly improved from baseline to 3 months posttreatment. SNOT-22, olfactory cleft endoscopy scale, and psychophysical olfactory evaluations did not change throughout treatment. Patients with higher number of acid pharyngeal reflux events reported lower psychophysical olfactory scores (P = .025).
LPR disease was associated with low odor identification results in patients without olfactory cleft abnormalities. The sense of smell did not improve after 3-month therapy. Future controlled studies using threshold, discrimination, and identification testing are needed.
通过心理物理学方法评估喉咽反流(LPR)患者的嗅觉。
前瞻性对照研究。
三级医疗中心。
2021年1月至2022年1月,对经下咽-食管多通道腔内阻抗-pH监测诊断为LPR的患者进行嗅觉的心理物理学评估。反流症状和体征通过反流症状评分(RSS)和反流体征评估(RSA)进行评估。鼻症状通过鼻-鼻窦结局测试22(SNOT-22)进行评估。从治疗前到治疗后,患者接受嗅觉棒识别测试和嗅裂检查。比较LPR患者和健康个体的临床结果。
共有107例患者和76名健康个体完成了评估。LPR患者的RSS、RSA和SNOT-22评分显著更高。与对照组相比,反流患者的心理物理学嗅觉评估显著更低,而嗅裂评分无显著差异。从基线到治疗后3个月,RSS和RSA显著改善。整个治疗过程中,SNOT-22、嗅裂内镜评分和心理物理学嗅觉评估均未改变。下咽酸反流事件次数较多的患者心理物理学嗅觉评分较低(P = 0.025)。
LPR疾病与无嗅裂异常患者的低气味识别结果相关。3个月治疗后嗅觉未改善。未来需要使用阈值、辨别和识别测试的对照研究。