• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在预防肿瘤学中对实验室研发检测的监管:新兴需求与机遇。

Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests in Preventive Oncology: Emerging Needs and Opportunities.

机构信息

Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):11-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00995. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.00995
PMID:35944238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10409443/
Abstract

Cancer predictive or diagnostic assays, offered as Laboratory-Developed Tests (LDTs), have been subject to regulatory authority and enforcement discretion by the US Food and Drug Administration. Many LDTs enter the market without US Food and Drug Administration or any regulatory review. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments focuses on analytic performance, but has limited oversight of the quality or utility of LDTs, including whether patients have been harmed as a result of their use. Increasingly, LDTs for cancer risk or early detection have been marketed directly to consumers, with many LDT developers depicting these tests, requested by patients but ordered by personal or company-associated physicians, as procedures falling under the practice of medicine. This patchwork of regulation and enforcement uncertainty regarding LDTs and public concerns about accuracy of tests given emergency authorization during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT (in vitro clinical test) Development Act of 2021. This pending federal legislation represents an opportunity to harmonize regulatory policies and address growing concerns over quality, utility, and safety of LDTs for cancer genomics, including tests marketed directly to consumers. We review here questions regarding the potential benefits and harms of some cancer-related LDTs for cancer risk and presymptomatic molecular diagnosis, increasingly marketed to oncologists or directly to the worried well. We offer specific proposals to strengthen oversight of the accuracy and clinical utility of cancer genetic testing to ensure public safety.

摘要

癌症预测或诊断检测,作为实验室开发的检测(LDT),一直受到美国食品和药物管理局的监管机构和执法自由裁量权的约束。许多 LDT 在未经美国食品和药物管理局或任何监管审查的情况下进入市场。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)根据临床实验室改进修正案(Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments)专注于分析性能,但对 LDT 的质量或实用性的监督有限,包括患者是否因使用这些检测而受到伤害。越来越多的用于癌症风险或早期检测的 LDT 已直接向消费者销售,许多 LDT 开发商将这些由患者要求但由私人或公司相关医生订购的检测描述为属于医学实践的程序。这种关于 LDT 的监管和执法不确定性的拼凑,以及公众对在 COVID-19 大流行期间紧急授权的检测准确性的担忧,导致了 2021 年的验证准确前沿体外临床检测(Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT)发展法案。这项悬而未决的联邦立法代表着协调监管政策的机会,并解决了人们对癌症基因组学中 LDT 的质量、实用性和安全性日益增长的担忧,包括直接向消费者销售的检测。我们在这里审查了一些与癌症风险和无症状分子诊断相关的 LDT 的潜在益处和危害的问题,这些 LDT 越来越多地向肿瘤学家或直接向担忧的健康人群销售。我们提出了具体的建议,以加强对癌症基因检测准确性和临床实用性的监督,以确保公众安全。

相似文献

1
Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests in Preventive Oncology: Emerging Needs and Opportunities.在预防肿瘤学中对实验室研发检测的监管:新兴需求与机遇。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):11-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00995. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
2
Laboratory-developed test regulation and the immunocompromised patient: uncertainty ahead.实验室研发检测规定与免疫功能低下患者:前路漫漫,充满不确定性。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;33(4):304-311. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000659.
3
Laboratory-Developed Tests: A Legislative and Regulatory Review.实验室自建检测方法:立法与监管审查
Clin Chem. 2017 Oct;63(10):1575-1584. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275164. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
4
Temporary Regulatory Deviations and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) PCR Labeling Update Study Indicate What Laboratory-Developed Test Regulation by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Could Look Like.临时监管调整和 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)PCR 标签更新研究表明,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对实验室开发的检测的监管可能是什么样子。
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Oct;23(10):1207-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests.实验室自建检测的监管。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Jul 5;152(2):122-131. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz096.
6
Impact of VALID Act implementation on mass spectrometry-based clinical proteomic laboratory developed tests.《有效法案》的实施对基于质谱的临床蛋白质组学实验室自建检测的影响
J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab. 2023 Feb 13;28:30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.02.001. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Quantitative tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory: Regulation and opportunity for validation of laboratory developed tests.临床实验室中的定量串联质谱分析:实验室自建检测方法验证的规范与机遇
J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab. 2023 Mar 5;28:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.03.001. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
A High-Level Overview of the Regulations Surrounding a Clinical Laboratory and Upcoming Regulatory Challenges for Laboratory Developed Tests.临床实验室相关法规概述及实验室自建检测项目即将面临的监管挑战
Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;52(4):315-328. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmaa086.
9
FDA's proposed rule for the regulation of laboratory-developed tests.FDA 关于实验室研发测试监管的拟议规则。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Feb 14;62(2):e0148823. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01488-23. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
10
College of american pathologists proposal for the oversight of laboratory-developed tests.美国病理学家学院关于实验室研发检测监管的提案。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Nov;135(11):1432-5. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0304-SA.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of endovascular management and anticoagulation alone on acute deep venous thrombosis in patients with inferior vena cava thrombosis.单纯血管内治疗及抗凝对下腔静脉血栓形成患者急性深静脉血栓的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21050. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07012-7.
2
Patient safety and healthcare quality of U.S. laboratory developed tests (LDTs) in the AI/ML era of precision medicine.精准医学人工智能/机器学习时代美国实验室自建检测(LDTs)的患者安全与医疗质量
Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Aug 5;11:1407513. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1407513. eCollection 2024.
3
Genetics healthcare providers' experiences counseling patients with results from consumer genomic testing.遗传咨询师在为接受消费者基因检测的患者提供咨询服务时的体验。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024 Aug;12(8):e2508. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2508.
4
Understanding the Landscape of Multi-Cancer Detection Tests: The Current Data and Clinical Considerations.了解多癌检测测试的现状:当前数据与临床考量
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;14(7):896. doi: 10.3390/life14070896.

本文引用的文献

1
Orthogonal Comparison of Four Plasma NGS Tests With Tumor Suggests Technical Factors are a Major Source of Assay Discordance.四项血浆NGS检测与肿瘤的正交比较表明技术因素是检测不一致的主要来源。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00191.
2
The PATHFINDER Study: Assessment of the Implementation of an Investigational Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test into Clinical Practice.探索者研究:评估一种研究性多癌早期检测测试在临床实践中的实施情况。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;13(14):3501. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143501.
3
Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set.使用独立验证集对靶向甲基化的多癌种早期检测测试进行临床验证。
Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1167-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.806. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Minimal Residual Disease Detection using a Plasma-only Circulating Tumor DNA Assay in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.利用仅血浆循环肿瘤 DNA 检测在结直肠癌患者中检测微小残留病灶。
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Oct 15;27(20):5586-5594. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0410. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Disparities in Genetic Testing and Care among Black women with Hereditary Breast Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌黑人女性在基因检测与治疗方面的差异。
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2020 Sep;12(3):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s12609-020-00364-1. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
The promise of direct-to-consumer COVID-19 testing: ethical and regulatory issues.面向消费者的新冠病毒检测的前景:伦理与监管问题
J Law Biosci. 2020 Sep 23;7(1):lsaa069. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa069. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
7
Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA.利用游离 DNA 中的甲基化特征进行敏感且特异的多癌种检测和定位。
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):745-759. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
8
Liquid biopsy enters the clinic - implementation issues and future challenges.液体活检进入临床——实施问题与未来挑战。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 May;18(5):297-312. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00457-x. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
9
Specificity of the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk 45-49 Year-Olds: A Cross-Sectional Study.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在平均风险 45-49 岁人群结直肠癌筛查中的特异性:一项横断面研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Apr;14(4):489-496. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0294. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
10
Benefits and Risks of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.直接面向消费者的检测的益处和风险。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Oct 1;144(10):1193-1198. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0078-RA.