Álvarez-Salgado Xosé Antón, Fernández-Reiriz María José, Fuentes-Santos Isabel, Antelo Luis T, Alonso Antonio A, Labarta Uxío
CSIC Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, Vigo, Spain.
CSIC Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, Vigo, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 25;849:157867. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157867. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Assessing the carbon footprint of marine bivalve aquaculture demands an accurate estimation of the CO release associated to capital goods and aquaculture operations but also to the metabolic CO budget of the cultured species. Nowadays, there are discrepancies on the processes to include in that budget, how to estimate them, and which scale should be applied, from individual to ecosystem. Site-specific environmental conditions and culture methods also affect significantly the estimates. Here, we have gathered environmental, biochemical and metabolic data from published scientific articles, reports and existing databases to present the metabolic CO budget for mussel aquaculture in the coastal inlets of the Northwest Iberian upwelling. We analyse the contribution of mussel flesh and shell production jointly and separately. At the individual scale, the shell CO budget is estimated from CO removal by shell matrix protein synthesis and CO release during calcification and respiration to support shell maintenance. Organic carbon in mussel flesh and CO released by respiration to support flesh maintenance contribute to the flesh CO budget. Only calcification and respiration processes are considered when estimating the metabolic carbon footprint of individual mussels because organic carbon in mussel flesh and shell returns to the atmosphere as CO in a relatively short period. While the metabolic carbon footprint associated to mussel shell remains constant at 365 kg CO per ton of shell, it varies from 92 to 578 kg CO per ton of mussel flesh. This large variability depends on mussel seeding time and harvesting size, due to the differential seasonal growth patterns of flesh and shell. Inclusion of the CO potentially immobilised in mussel faeces buried in the sediments would lead to a reduction of the metabolic carbon footprint estimates by up to 6 % compared with the individual estimates.
评估海洋双壳贝类水产养殖的碳足迹,不仅需要准确估算与资本货物和水产养殖作业相关的二氧化碳排放,还需要估算养殖物种的代谢二氧化碳预算。目前,在该预算应涵盖的过程、如何估算这些过程以及应采用何种尺度(从个体到生态系统)方面存在差异。特定地点的环境条件和养殖方法也会对估算结果产生重大影响。在这里,我们收集了已发表的科学文章、报告和现有数据库中的环境、生化和代谢数据,以呈现伊比利亚半岛西北部上升流沿海湾贻贝养殖的代谢二氧化碳预算。我们分别分析了贻贝肉和贝壳生产的贡献。在个体尺度上,贝壳的二氧化碳预算是根据贝壳基质蛋白合成过程中去除的二氧化碳以及钙化和呼吸过程中为维持贝壳而释放的二氧化碳来估算的。贻贝肉中的有机碳以及为维持肉质而通过呼吸释放的二氧化碳构成了肉质的二氧化碳预算。在估算单个贻贝的代谢碳足迹时,仅考虑钙化和呼吸过程,因为贻贝肉和贝壳中的有机碳会在相对较短的时间内以二氧化碳的形式返回大气。虽然与贻贝贝壳相关的代谢碳足迹保持恒定,为每吨贝壳365千克二氧化碳,但每吨贻贝肉的代谢碳足迹则在92至578千克二氧化碳之间变化。这种较大的变异性取决于贻贝的播种时间和收获大小,这是由于肉和贝壳的季节性生长模式不同所致。与个体估算相比,将潜在固定在埋藏于沉积物中的贻贝粪便中的二氧化碳纳入考虑,会使代谢碳足迹估算值降低多达6%。