Wang Jingyun, Yang Jun, Chen Tongbin
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Chemosphere. 2022 Nov;307(Pt 2):135923. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135923. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Identifying pollution sources and quantifying their contributions are of great importance for proposing management and control strategies of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in soil. In this study, multivariate statistical analysis and receptor models were combined to identify potential pollution sources and apportion their contributions at an abandoned realgar mine. Principal component analysis (PCA) result shows that three factors are responsible for PTEs, which is also supported by cluster analysis (CA). Correlation analysis and spatial analysis also show that the heavy metals from the same pollution source are of higher correlation coefficients and similar spatial distribution. Three receptor models were combined to apportion contributions of pollution sources. Three pollution sources were detected by absolute principal component analysis-multiple linear regression (APCA-MLR). In contrast, four sources were identified by positive matrix factorization (PMF) and UNMIX. Soil parent material was heavily loaded on Cr, Cu, Ni and Zn, occupying the largest average contribution (30%-43%). Cadmium was mainly derived from agricultural activities with contribution higher than 60%. Arsenic accumulation was mainly associated with mining and smelting activity with contribution higher than 80%. PMF and UNMIX models showed that more than half of Pb concentrations were influenced by industrial activities. Comparatively speaking, APCA-MLR was a well-performing model for all PTEs even though it only detected three pollution sources. The study showed that it was a good choice to apply multiple receptor models in order to achieve more reliable and objective conclusions of source appointment.
识别污染源并量化其贡献对于提出土壤中潜在有毒元素(PTEs)的管理和控制策略至关重要。在本研究中,将多元统计分析和受体模型相结合,以识别潜在污染源并在一个废弃雄黄矿中分配其贡献。主成分分析(PCA)结果表明,三个因素导致了PTEs的存在,聚类分析(CA)也支持这一结果。相关性分析和空间分析还表明,来自同一污染源的重金属具有更高的相关系数和相似的空间分布。结合三种受体模型来分配污染源的贡献。通过绝对主成分分析-多元线性回归(APCA-MLR)检测到三个污染源。相比之下,正矩阵分解(PMF)和UNMIX识别出四个污染源。土壤母质对Cr、Cu、Ni和Zn的负荷较重,平均贡献最大(30%-43%)。镉主要来源于农业活动,贡献高于60%。砷的积累主要与采矿和冶炼活动有关,贡献高于80%。PMF和UNMIX模型表明,超过一半的Pb浓度受工业活动影响。相对而言,APCA-MLR对所有PTEs来说都是一个性能良好的模型,尽管它只检测到三个污染源。研究表明,应用多种受体模型是一个不错的选择,以便获得更可靠、客观的污染源分配结论。