Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique Pavillon E, CHU Édouard Herriot, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Service de chirurgie orthopédique, CHU La Meynard, Fort-de-France, Martinique; Institut Pprime Institut UP 3346, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Nov;108(7):103391. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103391. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
The objective of this study was to compare the rates of radiological and clinical complications after sequential treatment of a tibial shaft fracture by external fixation followed by secondary nailing with an early-stage conversion (C1S) versus a two-stage late conversion (C2S). The hypothesis of this work was that treatment with C1S does not increase the risk of surgical site infections compared to C2S, and allows faster healing with a lower malunion rate.
We carried out a retrospective and comparative study based on the files of the traumatology department of the Édouard Herriot University Hospital in Lyon. We reviewed the records of patients who presented with a Gustilo grade 1, 2 or 3a open tibial fracture treated with external fixation with conversion by intramedullary nailing within 6 months from January 2010 to December 2020. We assessed the occurrence of Surgical Site Infections (SSI), consolidation time, time until resumption of weight bearing and the malunion rate.
Of the 55 patients included, a C1S procedure was performed in 25 cases (45.5%) versus 30 cases (54.5%) for C2S. No significant difference was found concerning the occurrence of SSI after intramedullary nailing between the two groups (p=0.81). A significant difference was observed in terms of bone healing (p=0.036) and the malunion rate (0.0013) in favor of nailing in one stage.
The strategy of converting an open leg fracture early, in one stage (C1S), after initial external fixator placement allows for faster healing and weight bearing, while ensuring a lower malunion rate compared to that of a late two-stage conversion. In the absence of a scar at the time of intramedullary nailing, C1S does not increase the risk of surgical site infections. While the choice of a late and sequential two-stage operation is likely related to the surgeon's apprehension around conversion of an open leg fracture by intramedullary nailing, this study could promote the use of C1S in a greater number of situations.
IV.
本研究的目的是比较外固定架治疗胫骨骨折后序贯治疗,即先二期改为髓内钉(C1S)与直接二期改为髓内钉(C2S)两种方法的放射学和临床并发症发生率。本研究的假设是,与 C2S 相比,C1S 治疗不会增加手术部位感染的风险,并且可以更快地愈合,降低畸形愈合的发生率。
我们进行了一项回顾性比较研究,基于里昂 Édouard Herriot 大学医院创伤科的病历。我们回顾了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,接受外固定架治疗,6 个月内改为髓内钉的 Gustilo 1、2 或 3a 级开放性胫骨骨折患者的记录。我们评估了手术部位感染(SSI)、骨愈合时间、负重时间和畸形愈合率的发生情况。
55 例患者中,C1S 组 25 例(45.5%),C2S 组 30 例(54.5%)。两组间髓内钉固定后 SSI 的发生率无显著差异(p=0.81)。两组在骨愈合方面(p=0.036)和畸形愈合率(0.0013)方面存在显著差异,一期内固定具有优势。
在外固定架初始固定后早期(C1S)进行一期转换的策略,允许更快的愈合和负重,同时与晚期两期转换相比,降低了畸形愈合的发生率。在髓内钉固定时没有疤痕的情况下,C1S 不会增加手术部位感染的风险。虽然晚期和序贯两期手术的选择可能与外科医生对开放性骨折经髓内钉转换的担忧有关,但本研究可能会促进更多情况下使用 C1S。
IV。