Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct;75(5):427-436. doi: 10.4097/kja.22286. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Because the quality of anesthesia affects the surgical outcome, the aim of this study was to investigate the current status of anesthetic services performed by anesthesiologists and non-anesthesiologists in South Korea from 2014 to 2016 and to compare the results with data from 2011 to 2013.
The claimed anesthesia services at medical institutions with employed anesthesiologists and the claims for an invitation fee for an anesthesiologist at medical institutions without employed anesthesiologists were regarded as anesthetic services performed by an anesthesiologist. From 2014 to 2016, the employment of anesthesiologists according to the type of medical institution, the status of anesthetic services according to the presence or absence of employed anesthesiologists, and status of anesthetic services at medical institutions without employed anesthesiologists were analyzed.
The proportion of medical institutions that employed anesthesiologists slightly increased from 27.8% in 2014 to 28.8% in 2016. General anesthesia was more concentrated at higher medical institutions, and most anesthesias were performed by an anesthesiologist. The proportion of spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, and brachial plexus performed by non-anesthesiologists was 11%, 15%, and 16.5%, respectively. Intravenous anesthesia performed by non-anesthesiologists was 58% and has increased compared to the past.
The employment of anesthesiologists has increased with time, and general anesthesiology was mostly performed by anesthesiologists. However, since the proportion of anesthetic services performed by non-anesthesiologists in regional anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia was maintained high, it is necessary to find ways to expand the safety of anesthetic services.
由于麻醉质量会影响手术结果,因此本研究旨在调查 2014 年至 2016 年韩国麻醉师和非麻醉师实施麻醉服务的现状,并将结果与 2011 年至 2013 年的数据进行比较。
有雇佣麻醉师的医疗机构申报的麻醉服务和没有雇佣麻醉师的医疗机构申报的麻醉师邀请费被视为麻醉师实施的麻醉服务。根据医疗机构的类型,分析 2014 年至 2016 年麻醉师的就业情况、有无雇佣麻醉师的麻醉服务情况以及没有雇佣麻醉师的医疗机构的麻醉服务情况。
有雇佣麻醉师的医疗机构比例从 2014 年的 27.8%略微上升到 2016 年的 28.8%。全身麻醉更集中在较高等级的医疗机构,大多数麻醉由麻醉师实施。非麻醉师实施的椎管内麻醉、硬膜外麻醉和臂丛神经阻滞的比例分别为 11%、15%和 16.5%。非麻醉师实施的静脉内麻醉的比例为 58%,与过去相比有所增加。
随着时间的推移,麻醉师的就业人数有所增加,全身麻醉主要由麻醉师实施。然而,由于区域麻醉和静脉内麻醉中非麻醉师实施的麻醉服务比例仍然较高,因此有必要寻找方法来扩大麻醉服务的安全性。