Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University.
Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 5;101(31):e29650. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029650.
Extrauterine leiomyoma occasionally occurs in rare locations with unusual growth patterns, especially pelvic retroperitoneal leiomyoma, which brings great challenges for surgeons to make a diagnosis. It is essential to distinguish benign from malignant retroperitoneal neoplasms according to the imaging manifestations. Laparotomy and laparoscopy are the common options for pelvic retroperitoneal neoplasms, while they may cause side effects during operation such as secondary damage. Appropriate surgical techniques should be adopted to ensure the complete excision of neoplasms meanwhile preserve the urination, defecation, and sexual function.
A 30-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of dull pain in the perianal region for 1 month. Laboratory results including tumor markers were all within normal limits. The digital rectal examination revealed a huge and tough mass with smooth mucosa protruding into the rectal cavity from the rear area of rectum.
Imaging examinations were performed. Contrasted computed tomography (CT) of pelvis showed an enhanced retroperitoneal solid mass in the space between sacrum and rectum, and very close to the levator ani muscle. The mass was about 11.0*8.0 cm in size. Computerized tomography angiography (CTA) showed the distal branches of bilateral internal iliac artery went into the mass. Endoscopic ultrasonography (US) showed the mass compressed the rectum, as well as a clear boundary to the rectal wall. A histopathologic examination confirmed the mass was a pelvic retroperitoneal leiomyoma.
The patient underwent an operative resection with da Vinci Si surgical system after routine preoperative preparation. Anorectal motility was weekly monitored postoperation. No additional adjuvant therapy was performed.
The patient could walk after 1 day and defecate normally on the third day after operation. She was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. No adverse events including pelvic floor hernia or defecation dysfunction occurred in the follow-up period. At 4 weeks follow-up, the patient was pain-free and recovered well.
Although imaging examinations were crucial for retroperitoneal neoplasms, histopathological examination remains the "gold standard" for making a definite diagnosis. This case highlights the possibility of retroperitoneal leiomyoma occurring in a woman of reproductive age and the advantages of robotic surgical system in pelvic retroperitoneal surgeries.
子宫外平滑肌瘤偶尔发生在罕见的位置,具有不同寻常的生长模式,尤其是盆腔腹膜后平滑肌瘤,这给外科医生的诊断带来了极大的挑战。根据影像学表现,区分良性和恶性腹膜后肿瘤至关重要。剖腹手术和腹腔镜手术是治疗盆腔腹膜后肿瘤的常见选择,但手术过程中可能会产生继发性损伤等副作用。应采用适当的手术技术,确保肿瘤完全切除,同时保留排尿、排便和性功能。
一名 30 岁女性因肛周区域隐痛 1 个月就诊于我院。实验室结果包括肿瘤标志物均在正常范围内。直肠指检发现一巨大而坚硬的肿块,从直肠后区光滑的黏膜突入直肠腔。
进行影像学检查。盆腔对比增强 CT 显示骶骨与直肠之间的腹膜后实性肿块,非常靠近肛提肌。肿块大小约为 11.0*8.0cm。计算机断层血管造影(CTA)显示双侧髂内动脉远端分支进入肿块。内镜超声(US)显示肿块压迫直肠,与直肠壁界限清晰。组织病理学检查证实肿块为盆腔腹膜后平滑肌瘤。
患者在常规术前准备后,采用达芬奇 Si 手术系统进行手术切除。术后每周监测肛肠动力。未行其他辅助治疗。
患者术后 1 天即可行走,术后第 3 天可正常排便。术后第 7 天出院。随访期间未发生盆底疝或排便功能障碍等不良事件。术后 4 周时,患者疼痛消失,恢复良好。
尽管影像学检查对腹膜后肿瘤很重要,但组织病理学检查仍然是明确诊断的“金标准”。本例提示,育龄期妇女可能发生腹膜后平滑肌瘤,且机器人手术系统在盆腔腹膜后手术中具有优势。