Suppr超能文献

液体启动时机对脓毒症死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析

The Effect of Fluid Initiation Timing on Sepsis Mortality: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Ward Michael A, Kuttab Hani I, Tuck Nicholas, Taleb Ali, Okut Hayrettin, Badgett Robert G

机构信息

Department of Emergency, 5232University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, 8586University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1504-1511. doi: 10.1177/08850666221118513. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines suggest the immediate initiation of crystalloid for sepsis-induced hypoperfusion but note that supporting evidence is low quality. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of timing of fluid initiation on mortality for adults with sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

Two authors independently reviewed relevant articles and extracted study details from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and previous relevant systematic reviews from 1-1-2000 to 1-6-2022. Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021245431) and bias assessed using CLARITY.

STUDY SELECTION

A minimum of severe sepsis (Sepsis-2) or sepsis (Sepsis-3) for patients ≥18 years old. Fluid initiation timing ranging from prehospital to 120 min within sepsis onset defined as "early" initiation.

DATA EXTRACTION

Included studies providing mortality-based odds ratios (or comparable) adjusting for confounders or prospective trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

From 1643 citations, five retrospective cohort studies were included (n = 20,209) with in-hospital mortality of 21.8%. A pooled analysis (odds ratio = OR [95% CI]) did not observe an impact on mortality for the early initiation of fluids among all patients, OR = 0.79 [0.62-1.02]; heterogeneity:  = 86% [70-94%], but when studies analyzed cases of hypotension where available, a survival benefit was observed, OR = 0.74 [0.61-0.90]. Initiation of fluids in two prehospital studies did not impact mortality, OR = 0.82 [0.27-2.43]. However, both prehospital cohorts observed benefit among hypotensive patients individually, although heterogenous results precluded significance when pooled, OR = 0.50 [0.21-1.18]. Three hospital-based studies with initiation stratified at 30, 100, and 120 min, observed survival benefit both individually and when pooled, OR = 0.78 [0.63-0.97]. No differences were observed between prehospital versus hospital subgroups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis supports the guideline recommendations for early fluid initiation once sepsis is recognized, especially in cases of hypotension. Findings are limited by the small number, heterogeneity, and retrospective nature of available studies. Further retrospective investigations may be worthwhile as randomized studies on fluid initiation are unlikely.

摘要

目的

当前指南建议对脓毒症诱导的低灌注立即开始输注晶体液,但指出支持证据质量较低。本研究的目的是探讨液体输注开始时间对脓毒症成年患者死亡率的影响。

数据来源

两位作者独立检索相关文章,并从PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、谷歌学术以及2000年1月1日至2022年6月1日之前的相关系统评价中提取研究细节。在PROSPERO(CRD42021245431)注册,并使用CLARITY评估偏倚。

研究选择

≥18岁患者至少为严重脓毒症(脓毒症-2)或脓毒症(脓毒症-3)。液体输注开始时间从院前到脓毒症发作后120分钟内定义为“早期”开始。

数据提取

纳入的研究提供基于死亡率的优势比(或类似指标)并对混杂因素进行校正,或为前瞻性试验。

数据合成

从1643篇文献中,纳入了5项回顾性队列研究(n = 20209),住院死亡率为21.8%。汇总分析(优势比 = OR [95%置信区间])未观察到所有患者早期开始输注液体对死亡率有影响,OR = 0.79 [0.62 - 1.02];异质性:I² = 86% [70 - 94%],但当研究分析有低血压情况的病例时,观察到生存获益,OR = 0.74 [0.61 - 0.90]。两项院前研究中液体输注开始并未影响死亡率,OR = 0.82 [0.27 - 2.43]。然而,两项院前队列研究各自在低血压患者中观察到获益,尽管汇总时结果异质性排除了显著性,OR = 0.50 [0.21 - 1.18]。三项基于医院的研究,输注开始时间分层为30、100和120分钟,单独及汇总分析时均观察到生存获益,OR = 0.78 [0.63 - 0.97]。院前与医院亚组之间未观察到差异。

结论

本荟萃分析支持一旦识别脓毒症就早期开始输注液体的指南建议,尤其是在低血压病例中。研究结果受到现有研究数量少、异质性以及回顾性性质的限制。由于不太可能进行关于液体输注开始的随机研究,进一步的回顾性调查可能是值得的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验