Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Children's Intensive Care Unit, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Apr 1;173(4):352-362. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4839.
The global patterns and distribution of case-fatality rates (CFRs) in pediatric severe sepsis and septic shock remain poorly described.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of children with severe sepsis and septic shock to elucidate the patterns of CFRs in developing and developed countries over time. We also described factors associated with CFRs.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica database, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Central systematically for randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies from earliest publication until January 2017, using the keywords "pediatric," "sepsis," "septic shock," and "mortality."
Studies involving children with severe sepsis and septic shock that reported CFRs were included. Retrospective studies and studies including only neonates were excluded.
We conducted our systematic review and meta-analysis in close accordance to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Pooled case-fatality estimates were obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. The associations of study period, study design, sepsis severity, age, and continents in which studies occurred were assessed with meta-regression.
Meta-analyses to provide pooled estimates of CFR of pediatric severe sepsis and septic shock over time.
Ninety-four studies that included 7561 patients were included. Pooled CFRs were higher in developing countries (31.7% [95% CI, 27.3%-36.4%]) than in developed countries (19.3% [95% CI, 16.4%-22.7%]; P < .001). Meta-analysis of CFRs also showed significant heterogeneity across studies. Continents that include mainly developing countries reported higher CFRs (adjusted odds ratios: Africa, 7.89 [95% CI, 6.02-10.32]; P < .001; Asia, 3.81 [95% CI, 3.60-4.03]; P < .001; South America, 2.91 [95% CI, 2.71-3.12]; P < .001) than North America. Septic shock was associated with higher CFRs than severe sepsis (adjusted odds ratios, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.41-1.54]). Younger age was also a risk factor (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.96] per year of increase in age). Earlier study eras were associated with higher CFRs (adjusted odds ratios for 1991-2000, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.13-1.37]; P < .001) compared with 2011 to 2016. Time-trend analysis showed higher CFRs over time in developing countries than developed countries.
Despite the declining trend of pediatric severe sepsis and septic shock CFRs, the disparity between developing and developed countries persists. Further characterizations of vulnerable populations and collaborations between developed and developing countries are warranted to reduce the burden of pediatric sepsis globally.
重要性:儿科严重脓毒症和感染性休克的全球病死率(CFR)模式和分布仍描述不足。
目的:我们对儿童严重脓毒症和感染性休克的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以阐明发展中国家和发达国家 CFR 随时间的变化模式。我们还描述了与 CFR 相关的因素。
数据来源:我们在最早发表的时间到 2017 年 1 月之间,通过“儿科”、“脓毒症”、“感染性休克”和“死亡率”等关键词,在 PubMed、Web of Science、Excerpta Medica 数据库、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)和 Cochrane Central 系统中搜索了随机临床试验和前瞻性观察性研究。
研究选择:纳入了报告 CFR 的涉及儿童严重脓毒症和感染性休克的研究。排除了回顾性研究和仅包括新生儿的研究。
数据提取和综合:我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的要求进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用随机效应荟萃分析获得汇总的病死率估计值。使用荟萃回归评估研究期间、研究设计、脓毒症严重程度、年龄和研究发生所在的大洲与 CFR 的相关性。
主要结局和测量:对儿科严重脓毒症和感染性休克的 CFR 随时间的变化进行荟萃分析,提供汇总估计值。
结果:纳入了 94 项研究,共纳入了 7561 例患者。发展中国家的 CFR (31.7%[95%CI,27.3%-36.4%])高于发达国家(19.3%[95%CI,16.4%-22.7%];P<0.001)。CFR 的荟萃分析还显示了研究之间存在显著的异质性。主要包括发展中国家的大洲报告了更高的 CFR(调整后的优势比:非洲,7.89[95%CI,6.02-10.32];P<0.001;亚洲,3.81[95%CI,3.60-4.03];P<0.001;南美洲,2.91[95%CI,2.71-3.12];P<0.001)比北美。感染性休克比严重脓毒症更易导致更高的 CFR(调整后的优势比,1.47[95%CI,1.41-1.54])。年龄较小也是一个危险因素(调整后的优势比,每增加 1 岁,0.95[95%CI,0.94-0.96])。早期的研究时代与更高的 CFR 相关(1991-2000 年的调整优势比,1.24[95%CI,1.13-1.37];P<0.001),而与 2011 年至 2016 年相比。时间趋势分析显示,发展中国家 CFR 随时间呈上升趋势。
结论和相关性:尽管儿科严重脓毒症和感染性休克的 CFR 呈下降趋势,但发展中国家和发达国家之间的差距仍然存在。有必要进一步描述弱势群体的特征,并加强发达国家和发展中国家之间的合作,以降低全球儿童脓毒症的负担。