Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE), CSIC, Zaragoza, Spain.
Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13982. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13982. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
River conservation efforts traditionally focus on perennial watercourses (i.e., those that do not dry) and their associated aquatic biodiversity. However, most of the global river network is not perennial and thus supports both aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity. We assessed the conservation value of nonperennial rivers and streams (NPRS) in one of Europe's driest regions based on aquatic (macroinvertebrates, diatoms) and terrestrial (riparian plants, birds, and carabid beetles) community data. We mapped the distribution of taxa at 90 locations and across wide environmental gradients. Using the systematic planning tool Marxan, we identified priority conservation sites under 2 scenarios: aquatic taxa alone or aquatic and terrestrial taxa together. We explored how environmental factors (runoff, flow intermittence, elevation, salinity, anthropogenic impact) influenced Marxan's site selection frequency. The NPRS were selected more frequently (over 13% on average) than perennial rivers when both aquatic and terrestrial taxa were considered, suggesting that NPRS have a high conservation value at the catchment scale. We detected an underrepresentation of terrestrial taxa (8.4-10.6% terrestrial vs. 0.5-1.1% aquatic taxa were unrepresented in most Marxan solutions) when priority sites were identified based exclusively on aquatic biodiversity, which points to a low surrogacy value of aquatic taxa for terrestrial taxa. Runoff explained site selection when focusing on aquatic taxa (all best-fitting models included runoff, r = 0.26-0.27), whereas elevation, salinity, and flow intermittence were more important when considering both groups. In both cases, site selection frequency declined as anthropogenic impact increased. Our results highlight the need to integrate terrestrial and aquatic communities when identifying priority areas for conservation in catchments with NPRS. This is key to overcoming drawbacks of traditional assessments based only on aquatic taxa and to ensure the conservation of NPRS, especially as NPRS become more prevalent worldwide due to climate change and increasing water demands.
传统的河流保护工作侧重于常年性水道(即那些不干涸的水道)及其相关的水生生物多样性。然而,全球大部分河流网络并非常年性的,因此既支持水生生物多样性,也支持陆地生物多样性。我们根据水生(大型无脊椎动物、硅藻)和陆地(河岸植物、鸟类和步甲科甲虫)群落数据,评估了欧洲最干旱地区之一的非常年性河流和溪流(NPRS)的保护价值。我们在 90 个地点和广泛的环境梯度上绘制了分类群的分布。使用系统规划工具 Marxan,我们在两种情况下确定了优先保护地点:仅考虑水生分类群或同时考虑水生和陆地分类群。我们探讨了环境因素(径流量、水流间歇性、海拔、盐度、人为影响)如何影响 Marxan 的选址频率。当同时考虑水生和陆地分类群时,NPRS 的选择频率(平均超过 13%)高于常年性河流,这表明在集水区尺度上,NPRS 具有很高的保护价值。当仅根据水生生物多样性确定优先地点时,我们发现陆地分类群的代表性不足(大多数 Marxan 解决方案中,8.4-10.6%的陆地分类群与 0.5-1.1%的水生分类群未被代表),这表明水生分类群对陆地分类群的替代价值较低。当仅关注水生分类群时,径流量解释了选址(所有最佳拟合模型均包括径流量,r = 0.26-0.27),而当同时考虑两个组时,海拔、盐度和水流间歇性则更为重要。在这两种情况下,随着人为影响的增加,选址频率下降。我们的研究结果强调,在有 NPRS 的集水区确定保护优先区时,需要整合陆地和水生群落。这是克服仅基于水生分类群进行传统评估的缺点的关键,也是确保 NPRS 得到保护的关键,尤其是由于气候变化和日益增长的用水需求,NPRS 在全球范围内变得越来越普遍。