Suppr超能文献

下颌磨牙症状性不可复性牙髓炎患者中 2%甲哌卡因与 4%阿替卡因下齿槽神经阻滞成功率的随机双盲单中心临床试验。

Inferior alveolar nerve block success of 2% mepivacaine versus 4% articaine in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars: A randomized double-blind single-centre clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2022 Nov;55(11):1177-1189. doi: 10.1111/iej.13810. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) success of 2% mepivacaine (Scandonest 2%, Septodont, France) and 4% articaine (Septanest 4%, Septodont) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) in mandibular molars during access cavity preparation and instrumentation.

METHODOLOGY

Three hundred and thirty patients with moderate-to-severe pain in mandibular molars with SIP randomly received either 3.6 ml 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100 000 adrenalin or 3.4 ml 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100 000 adrenalin (n = 165). Intraoperative pain (IOP) intensity was assessed during access cavity preparation and canal instrumentation using 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Overall success was considered if the patient felt no-to-mild pain without the need for supplemental anaesthesia throughout treatment; the incidence of need for supplemental anaesthesia was also recorded. Data were statistically analysed using Mann-Whitney U- and Chi-squared (χ ) tests. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of anaesthetic failure were calculated. The effect of pre-disposing factors on outcome variables was assessed using multivariable regression analyses. None of the participants reported any adverse effects.

RESULTS

Baseline variables were balanced between groups (p > .05). The IOP intensity during access cavity preparation and canal instrumentation was similar for both groups (p > .05). IOP intensity was associated with preoperative pain intensity and tooth type (p < .05). Overall anaesthetic success rate was 35.8% for mepivacaine and 41.2% for articaine (p > .05) with a relative risk of failure [95% CI] 1.09 [0.92, 1.30]. The need for supplemental anaesthesia occurred 43.6% and 38.2% with mepivacaine and articaine respectively (p > .05; RR [95% CI]: 1.14 [0.88, 1.48]). Preoperative pain level and age were associated with the need for supplemental anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

2% mepivacaine and 4% articaine demonstrate similar IANB success rates for mandibular molars with SIP. Intraoperative pain experience during endodontic treatment can be associated with preoperative pain, tooth type and age.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在预备和根管预备过程中,患有症状性不可复性牙髓炎(SIP)的下颌磨牙患者接受 2%甲哌卡因(Scandonest 2%,Septodont,法国)和 4%阿替卡因(Septanest 4%,Septodont)进行下齿槽神经阻滞(IANB)的成功率。

方法

330 名下颌磨牙中度至重度疼痛的 SIP 患者随机接受 3.6ml 2%盐酸甲哌卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素或 3.4ml 4%盐酸阿替卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素(n=165)。术中疼痛(IOP)强度采用 11 分数字评分量表(NRS)在预备窝洞和根管预备过程中进行评估。如果患者在整个治疗过程中无疼痛或仅有轻度疼痛,无需辅助麻醉,则认为总体治疗成功;同时还记录了需要辅助麻醉的发生率。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验和卡方检验(χ )对数据进行统计学分析。计算麻醉失败的相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用多变量回归分析评估预处理因素对结果变量的影响。

结果

两组间基线变量平衡(p>0.05)。两组间预备窝洞和根管预备过程中的 IOP 强度相似(p>0.05)。IOP 强度与术前疼痛强度和牙齿类型有关(p<0.05)。甲哌卡因的总体麻醉成功率为 35.8%,阿替卡因的成功率为 41.2%(p>0.05),失败的相对风险[95%CI]为 1.09[0.92, 1.30]。分别有 43.6%和 38.2%的患者需要辅助麻醉,用甲哌卡因和阿替卡因(p>0.05;RR[95%CI]:1.14[0.88, 1.48])。术前疼痛水平和年龄与需要辅助麻醉有关。

结论

2%甲哌卡因和 4%阿替卡因在下颌磨牙 SIP 中具有相似的 IANB 成功率。根管治疗过程中的术中疼痛体验可能与术前疼痛、牙齿类型和年龄有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验