Injury Prevention Research Center, 2190 Westlawn, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 145 N. Riverside Drive, Room N273, Iowa City, IA, 52242-2007, USA.
J Prev (2022). 2022 Dec;43(6):739-757. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00699-8. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Intimate partner homicides (IPHs) often occur in the context of violent relationships, and firearms often facilitate lethal outcomes. Accordingly, policies have been implemented to reduce firearm access among individuals with histories of intimate partner violence (IPV) or violent propensities. There is considerable variation, however, in the enactment and implementation of such state-level firearm protection laws. Some states fail to extend IPV-related firearm related protections to dating partners, creating what has been referred to elsewhere as the "boyfriend loophole", or what will be referred to here as the "partner loophole". The goal of this analysis was to examine trends in National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) data to assess the relationship of IPHs among unmarried victims in association with state partner loopholes. State policies were abstracted to identify partner loopholes. A series of negative binomial generalized estimating equations were performed using lagged policy variables, year fixed-effects, robust standard errors, and errors clustered by state. Model findings suggest that increased firearm access is related to higher rates of unmarried IPH victimization, however, the associations between the presence of a partner loophole and IPH rates amongst unmarried victims varied between racial subgroups. Significant, protective relationships with closed partner loopholes were identified for the IPH rates amongst white unmarried victims, however, not amongst victims of color. The partner loophole policies considered here, and other individual IPV-related and/or firearm-related policies may be an important component of protections, however, our findings suggest they are not independently sufficient to equitably reduce the burden of IPH. Continuing to develop public health and policy evaluation literature will be essential to progressing towards a policy landscape and cultural environment that are equitably protective.
亲密伴侣杀人案 (IPH) 通常发生在暴力关系的背景下,枪支往往是致命的。因此,已经实施了政策来减少有亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 或暴力倾向的个人获得枪支的机会。然而,这种州级枪支保护法的颁布和执行存在很大差异。有些州没有将与 IPV 相关的枪支保护措施扩大到约会伴侣,这在其他地方被称为“男朋友漏洞”,或者在这里将被称为“伴侣漏洞”。本分析的目的是检查国家暴力死亡报告系统 (NVDRS) 数据中的趋势,以评估未婚受害者中与州伴侣漏洞相关的 IPH 关系。从政策中抽象出州政策来识别伴侣漏洞。使用滞后政策变量、年度固定效应、稳健标准误差和按州聚类的误差,进行了一系列负二项式广义估计方程。模型结果表明,增加枪支获取与未婚 IPH 受害率较高有关,但是,伴侣漏洞的存在与未婚受害者中的 IPH 率之间的关联在不同的种族亚组之间存在差异。对于未婚白人受害者的 IPH 率,封闭伴侣漏洞存在显著的保护关系,但对于有色人种受害者则不存在。这里考虑的伴侣漏洞政策,以及其他与个人 IPV 相关和/或与枪支相关的政策,可能是保护的一个重要组成部分,然而,我们的研究结果表明,它们本身并不足以公平地减少 IPH 的负担。继续发展公共卫生和政策评估文献对于朝着公平保护的政策格局和文化环境发展至关重要。