Weakley Jonathon, Munteanu Gabriella, Cowley Nicholas, Johnston Rich, Morrison Matthew, Gardiner Carissa, Pérez-Castilla Alejandro, García-Ramos Amador
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Sports Performance, Recovery, Injury and New Technologies (SPRINT) Research Center, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Apr 1;37(4):787-792. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004337. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
Weakley, J, Munteanu, G, Cowley, N, Johnston, R, Morrison, M, Gardiner, C, Pérez-Castilla, A, and García-Ramos, A. The criterion validity and between-day reliability of the Perch for measuring barbell velocity during commonly used resistance training exercises. J Strength Cond Res 37(4): 787-792, 2023-This study aimed to assess the criterion validity and between-day reliability (accounting for technological and biological variability) of mean and peak concentric velocity from the Perch measurement system. On 2 testing occasions, 16 subjects completed repetitions at 20, 40, 60, 80, 90, and 100% of 1-repetition maximum in the free-weight barbell back squat and bench press. To assess criterion validity, values from the Perch and a 3-dimensional motion capture system (criterion) were compared. Technological variability was assessed by determining whether the differences between the Perch and criterion for each load were comparable for both testing sessions, whereas between-day reliability with both technological and biological variability was calculated from Perch values across days. Generalized estimating equations were used to calculate R2 and root mean square error, whereas Bland-Altman plots assessed magnitude of difference between measures. To support monitoring of athletes over time, standard error of measurement and minimum detectable changes (MDC) were calculated. There was excellent agreement between the Perch and criterion device, with mean velocity in both exercises demonstrating a mean bias ranging from -0.01 to 0.01 m·s -1 . For peak velocity, Perch underestimated velocity compared with the criterion ranging from -0.08 to -0.12 m·s -1 for the back squat and -0.01 to -0.02 m·s -1 for the bench press. Technological variability between-days were all less than the MDC. These findings demonstrate that the Perch provides valid and reliable mean and peak concentric velocity outputs across a range of velocities. Therefore, practitioners can confidently implement this device for the monitoring and prescription of resistance training.
威克利,J;蒙泰亚努,G;考利,N;约翰斯顿,R;莫里森,M;加德纳,C;佩雷斯 - 卡斯蒂利亚,A;加西亚 - 拉莫斯,A。Perch在常用抗阻训练动作中测量杠铃速度的标准效度和日间可靠性。《力量与体能研究杂志》37(4): 787 - 792,2023年。本研究旨在评估Perch测量系统中平均和峰值向心速度的标准效度和日间可靠性(考虑技术和生物变异性)。在2次测试中,16名受试者在自由重量杠铃后深蹲和卧推中,以1次最大重复量的20%、40%、60%、80%、90%和100%完成重复动作。为评估标准效度,比较了Perch和三维运动捕捉系统(标准)的值。通过确定每次测试中Perch与标准在各负荷下的差异是否可比来评估技术变异性,而包含技术和生物变异性的日间可靠性则根据不同日期的Perch值计算得出。使用广义估计方程计算R2和均方根误差,而布兰德 - 奥特曼图评估测量值之间的差异大小。为支持对运动员的长期监测,计算了测量标准误和最小可检测变化(MDC)。Perch与标准设备之间具有极佳的一致性,两项动作中的平均速度平均偏差范围为 -0.01至0.01米·秒 -1。对于峰值速度,与标准相比,Perch低估了速度,后深蹲的低估范围为 -0.08至 -0.12米·秒 -1,卧推的低估范围为 -0.01至 -0.02米·秒 -1。日间技术变异性均小于MDC。这些发现表明,Perch在一系列速度范围内提供有效且可靠的平均和峰值向心速度输出。因此,从业者可以放心地使用该设备进行抗阻训练的监测和处方制定。