Suppr超能文献

闭孔神经损伤的神经移植、端端修复及神经移位的系统评价

A systematic review of nerve grafting, end-to-end repair, and nerve transfer for obturator nerve injuries.

作者信息

Garg Stuti P, Hassan Abbas M, Patel Anooj, Ketheeswaran Suvethavarshini, Galiano Robert D, Ko Jason H

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Sep 6;32(9):1177-1182. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003565.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Obturator nerve injury can occur as a complication of gynecologic surgeries, occurring most frequently in patients with endometriosis and genitourinary malignancies. The resulting injury causes paresthesia and major weakness in adduction and atrophy of the adductor group of lower extremity muscles. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of end-to-end repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer in improving motor function in patients with obturator nerve injury.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and Embase libraries were searched from May 1994 to August 2020 according to the PRISMA guidelines for articles that present functional outcomes after obturator nerve injury in patients treated with nerve grafting, end-to-end repair, or nerve transfer.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients from 22 studies were included in the study, 15 of whom were treated with end-to-end repair (60%), nine with nerve grafting (36%), and one with nerve transfer (4%). Of the 15 patients with transection data, two had incomplete (13%) and 13 had complete (87%) nerve transections. The patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=24) and radical cystectomy (n=1) operations. The mean Medical Research Council (MRC) score was 2.95±1.7 immediately after treatment and 4.77±0.6 at the final follow-up. All patients achieved good outcomes (MRC ≥3) at the final follow-up. The mean MRC score for end-to-end repair (n=15), nerve grafting (n=9), and nerve transfer (n=1) was 4.8±0.6, 4.7±0.8, and 5, respectively. Patients with end-to-end repair had higher immediate post-operative strength than those treated with nerve grafting (p=0.03) and tended to achieve full functional recovery after shorter periods of time (rho=-0.65, p=0.049). Other parameters did not correlate with MRC.

CONCLUSION

End-to-end repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer are equally effective in restoring function in patients with obturator nerve injury. However, patients treated with end-to-end repair had higher immediate post-operative strength than those treated with nerve grafting.

摘要

目的

闭孔神经损伤可能作为妇科手术的一种并发症出现,最常发生于子宫内膜异位症和泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者。由此导致的损伤会引起感觉异常以及下肢内收肌群内收和萎缩方面的严重无力。本研究的目的是对端对端修复、神经移植和神经移位在改善闭孔神经损伤患者运动功能方面的有效性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

根据PRISMA指南,检索1994年5月至2020年8月期间PubMed、Cochrane、Medline和Embase数据库中有关接受神经移植、端对端修复或神经移位治疗的闭孔神经损伤患者功能结局的文章。

结果

本研究共纳入来自22项研究的25例患者,其中15例接受端对端修复(60%),9例接受神经移植(36%),1例接受神经移位(4%)。在15例有神经横断数据的患者中,2例为不完全神经横断(13%),13例为完全神经横断(87%)。患者接受了盆腔淋巴结清扫术(n = 24)和根治性膀胱切除术(n = 1)。治疗后即刻平均医学研究委员会(MRC)评分为2.95±1.7,末次随访时为4.77±0.6。所有患者在末次随访时均取得良好结局(MRC≥3)。端对端修复(n = 15)、神经移植(n = 9)和神经移位(n = 1)的平均MRC评分分别为4.8±0.6、4.7±0.8和5。端对端修复的患者术后即刻肌力高于接受神经移植的患者(p = 0.03),且往往在更短时间内实现完全功能恢复(rho = -0.65,p = 0.049)。其他参数与MRC无相关性。

结论

端对端修复、神经移植和神经移位在恢复闭孔神经损伤患者的功能方面同样有效。然而,接受端对端修复的患者术后即刻肌力高于接受神经移植的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验