Hutin Anthony, Carvalho Marcio S
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pontifical Universidade Catholic do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil.
Langmuir. 2022 Aug 23;38(33):10139-10149. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01058. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Interfacial tension and dilatational rheology are often used to characterize the mechanical response of a liquid interface using axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA). It is important to note that for systems dominated by adsorption/desorption of surfactants, the contributions of extra mechanical stresses are negligible; thus, the Young-Laplace equation remains valid. However, for interfaces dominated by extra stresses, as in the case of particle monolayers or asphaltenes that clearly exhibit a skin (a rigid film), the nature of the elastic response is fundamentally different and the validity of the equation is questionable. Calculation of the interfacial tension and dilatational elasticity using drop shape analysis depends critically on the drop shape following the Young-Laplace equation. If the interface becomes more like a solid, the drop shape will deviate from being purely Laplacian. Indeed, the drop will exhibit a wrinkled surface as collapse continues. The geometric parameter , defined as the ratio (d/)/(d/) with is the volume of the drop and is the area of the interface), allows one to measure the deviation of the drop shape from purely Laplacian. For a simple interface (pure liquids or surfactant solutions), is quite close to the theoretical value of 1.5 of a perfect sphere. Nevertheless, if the molecules adsorbed at the interface begin to interact strongly, the ratio can vary. In the limit of long-time-scale experiments, of some drops approaches 2. We studied the evolution of the parameter for different systems, from simple to complex, as a function of oscillation frequencies and amplitudes of drop volume. The results obtained were compared to the values of the interfacial moduli and drop shape behavior to better characterize the regime change.
界面张力和拉伸流变学通常用于通过轴对称滴形分析(ADSA)来表征液体界面的力学响应。需要注意的是,对于以表面活性剂吸附/解吸为主导的系统,额外机械应力的贡献可忽略不计;因此,杨-拉普拉斯方程仍然有效。然而,对于由额外应力主导的界面,如在明显呈现皮层(刚性膜)的颗粒单层或沥青质的情况下,弹性响应的性质有根本不同,该方程的有效性也值得怀疑。使用滴形分析计算界面张力和拉伸弹性关键取决于遵循杨-拉普拉斯方程的滴形。如果界面变得更像固体,滴形将偏离纯拉普拉斯形状。实际上,随着塌陷继续,液滴将呈现出皱巴巴的表面。几何参数 ,定义为比率(d/)/(d/),其中 是液滴体积, 是界面面积),可以用来测量滴形与纯拉普拉斯形状的偏差。对于简单界面(纯液体或表面活性剂溶液), 非常接近完美球体的理论值1.5。然而,如果吸附在界面上的分子开始强烈相互作用,该比率可能会变化。在长时间尺度实验的极限情况下,一些液滴的 接近2。我们研究了从简单到复杂的不同系统中参数 的演变,作为滴体积振荡频率和振幅的函数。将获得的结果与界面模量值和滴形行为进行比较,以更好地表征状态变化。