Suppr超能文献

比较敏感性 SES 和全 SES 实施策略,以提高社会经济背景较低的患者在基于网络的抑郁症状干预中的参与率:初级保健中的一项集群随机试验。

Comparing a ses-sensitive and an all-ses implementation strategy to improve participation rates of patients with a lower socioeconomic background in a web-based intervention for depressive complaints: a cluster randomised trial in primary care.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health & Prevention, Trimbos Institute: Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Academy Het Dorp, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2022 Aug 11;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01793-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is a major public health concern, which is most pronounced in population segments with a lower social-economic status (SES). E-health interventions for depressive complaints are proven to be effective, but their reach needs to be improved, especially among people with a lower socioeconomic status (SES). Implementing e-health interventions in the primary care setting with SES-sensitive guidance from General Practice nurses (GP nurses) may be a useful strategy to increase the reach of e-health in lower SES groups. We implemented an evidence-based online intervention that targets depressive complaints in primary care.

METHODS

A pragmatic cluster-randomised trial was conducted in two parallel groups where a SES sensitive (SES-sens) implementation strategy with additional face-to-face guidance by GP nurses was compared to an all-SES implementation strategy. The primary outcome was the percentage of lower SES participants in either condition. Participation was defined as completing at least 1 face-to-face session and 2 online exercises. Participation rates were evaluated using logistic mixed modelling.

RESULTS

In both conditions, the participation rates of lower SES participants were quite high, but were notably lower in the SES-sens implementation condition (44%) than in the all-SES implementation condition (58%). This unexpected outcome remained statistically significant even after adjusting for potential confounders between the conditions (Odds Ratio 0.43, 95%-CI 0.22 to 0.81). Less guidance was provided by the GP nurses in the SES-sens group, contrary to the implementation instructions.

CONCLUSIONS

From a public health point of view, it is good news that a substantial number of primary care patients with a lower SES level used the implemented e-health intervention. It is also positive that an all-SES implementation strategy performed well, and even outperformed a SES-sensitive strategy. However, this was an unexpected finding, warranting further research into tailoring implementation strategies of e-health interventions towards specific target groups in the primary care setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, identifier: NL6595 , registered on 12 November 2017.

摘要

背景

抑郁症是一个主要的公共卫生问题,在社会经济地位较低的人群中最为明显。针对抑郁症状的电子健康干预措施已被证明是有效的,但需要提高其覆盖面,特别是在社会经济地位较低的人群中。在初级保健环境中,由全科医生护士(GP 护士)提供社会经济地位敏感的指导,实施电子健康干预措施,可能是提高社会经济地位较低人群中电子健康服务覆盖面的有效策略。我们实施了一项针对初级保健中抑郁症状的基于证据的在线干预措施。

方法

在两个平行组中进行了一项实用的集群随机试验,比较了一种社会经济地位敏感(SES-sens)实施策略,即增加 GP 护士的面对面指导,与一种全社会经济地位实施策略。主要结果是两种情况下社会经济地位较低的参与者的百分比。参与被定义为至少完成 1 次面对面会议和 2 次在线练习。使用逻辑混合模型评估参与率。

结果

在两种情况下,社会经济地位较低的参与者的参与率都相当高,但在 SES-sens 实施条件下(44%)明显低于全社会经济地位实施条件下(58%)。即使在调整了两种条件之间的潜在混杂因素后,这一意外结果仍然具有统计学意义(优势比 0.43,95%置信区间 0.22 至 0.81)。与实施说明相反,SES-sens 组的 GP 护士提供的指导较少。

结论

从公共卫生的角度来看,大量社会经济地位较低的初级保健患者使用了实施的电子健康干预措施,这是一个好消息。全社会经济地位实施策略表现良好,甚至优于社会经济地位敏感策略,这也是一个积极的结果。然而,这是一个意外的发现,需要进一步研究针对初级保健环境中特定目标群体的电子健康干预措施的实施策略。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册中心,标识符:NL6595,于 2017 年 11 月 12 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c81/9367024/045cdaa58ef8/12875_2022_1793_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验