Abdellatif Waleed, Nugent James P, Alballa Faisal, Murray Nicolas, Jalal Sabeena, Ali Ismail T, Nicolaou Savvas
Department of Radiology, 12334UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Radiology, 8167University of British Columbia/Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023 Feb;74(1):110-118. doi: 10.1177/08465371221118886. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
To assess value of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) collagen material decomposition algorithm when combined with standard computed tomography (CT) in detection of lumbar disc extrusion and sequestration. Retrospective analysis of all patients with acute low back pain who had a diagnosis of lumbar spine disc extrusion and/or sequestration on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (reference standard), and had undergone non-contrast DECT of the lumbar spine within 60 days of the MRI. Age and sex-matched control patients (n = 42) were included. Patients were grouped into standard, grey-scale CT only group and standard CT + DECT tendon images group. Two double-blinded radiologists reviewed both groups for presence of extrusion or sequestration. They also rated their diagnostic confidence on Likert 5-point scale. McNemar Chi-square test was used to compare diagnostic accuracy, unpaired t-test to compare reviewers diagnostic confidence, and Cohen's k (kappa) test for interobserver agreement. The combined group showed higher overall sensitivity (96.6% vs 87.2%), specificity (99% vs 95.4%), and diagnostic accuracy (98.7% vs 94.5%) with a lower false positive rate (1.1% vs 4.6%). McNemar Chi-square test confirmed statistical significance ( = .03 and = .02 for Reviewers R1 and R2, respectively). The mean diagnostic confidence was also significantly higher on combined group (R1: 3.74 ± 1.1 vs 3.47 ± 1.15 ( < .01) and R2: 3.91 ± 1.15 vs 3.72 ± 1.16 [mean ± SD] ( = .02)). Utilizing MRI as a reference standard, DECT tendon application combined with standard CT increases the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of detection of lumbar spine disc extrusion and sequestration, when compared to standard CT alone.
评估双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)胶原物质分解算法与标准计算机断层扫描(CT)联合应用于检测腰椎间盘突出和游离时的价值。对所有急性腰痛患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者经磁共振成像(MRI)(参考标准)诊断为腰椎间盘突出和/或游离,并在MRI检查后60天内接受了腰椎非增强DECT检查。纳入年龄和性别匹配的对照患者(n = 42)。患者分为仅标准灰度CT组和标准CT + DECT肌腱图像组。两名双盲放射科医生对两组进行检查,以确定是否存在椎间盘突出或游离。他们还使用李克特5级量表对诊断信心进行评分。采用McNemar卡方检验比较诊断准确性,采用非配对t检验比较检查者的诊断信心,并采用Cohen's k(kappa)检验评估观察者间的一致性。联合组显示出更高的总体敏感性(96.6%对87.2%)、特异性(99%对95.4%)和诊断准确性(98.7%对94.5%),假阳性率更低(1.1%对4.6%)。McNemar卡方检验证实具有统计学意义(R1和R2的P值分别为0.03和0.02)。联合组的平均诊断信心也显著更高(R1:3.74±1.1对3.47±1.15(P < 0.01),R2:3.91±1.15对3.72±1.16[均值±标准差](P = 0.02))。以MRI作为参考标准,与单独使用标准CT相比,DECT肌腱应用联合标准CT可提高腰椎间盘突出和游离检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性。