Putzeys Guy, Uyttebroek Sigurd
Orthopedic and Trauma Department, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk.
Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Ghent University Hospital, Gent Belgium.
OTA Int. 2022 Apr 18;5(2 Suppl):e169. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000169. eCollection 2022 Apr.
The outcome of primary hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures is highly dependent on the position and survival of the tuberosities. Preserving the cuff-tuberosity complex as a unit (named cap technique) is thought to improve the reduction and stability of the tuberosities. We present the first report of the cap technique and compare it with the common intertubercular split technique.
Comparative retrospective study on consecutive patients.
Urban level 1 trauma center.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Included were all patients treated between May 2010 and August 2019 with the Affinis Fracture (Mathys, Switzerland) hemiarthroplasty for complex shoulder fractures. The cap technique was used from February 2015 onward. Minimum follow-up of 11 months. Dementia was an exclusion criterium.
Clinical evaluation by (normalized) Constant-Murley score, DASH score, and EQ5D-VAS score. Radiological outcomes according to the criteria of Boileau.
The cap-technique group consisted of 26 patients. One patient had revision surgery; 23 patients could be evaluated at a mean follow-up of 28 months. The control group consisted of 26 patients. Three patients had revision surgery. Ten patients could be scored at a mean follow-up of 101 months. A statistically significant difference in Constant-Murley score ( = .0121) could be observed between case and control group. There were no significant differences between radiological scores and between revision rates.
The cap technique significantly improves clinical outcome in comparison with the intertubercular split technique. However, there was no significant difference in radiographic appearance of the tuberosities.
复杂肱骨近端骨折一期半关节成形术的结果高度依赖于结节的位置和存活情况。将袖带-结节复合体作为一个整体保留(即帽状技术)被认为可改善结节的复位和稳定性。我们首次报告了帽状技术,并将其与常见的结节间劈开技术进行比较。
对连续患者进行的比较性回顾性研究。
城市一级创伤中心。
患者/参与者:纳入2010年5月至2019年8月间所有使用Affinis骨折(瑞士马蒂斯公司)半关节成形术治疗复杂肩部骨折的患者。自2015年2月起采用帽状技术。最短随访11个月。痴呆症为排除标准。
通过(标准化的)Constant-Murley评分、DASH评分和EQ5D-VAS评分进行临床评估。根据布瓦洛标准评估放射学结果。
帽状技术组有26例患者。1例患者接受了翻修手术;23例患者在平均28个月的随访中可进行评估。对照组有26例患者。3例患者接受了翻修手术。10例患者在平均101个月的随访中可进行评分。病例组和对照组之间在Constant-Murley评分上存在统计学显著差异(=0.0121)。放射学评分和翻修率之间无显著差异。
与结节间劈开技术相比,帽状技术显著改善了临床结果。然而,结节的放射学表现无显著差异。