Suppr超能文献

在先前内分泌治疗后进展的激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌中,组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂联合依西美坦与单用依西美坦的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of a histone deacetylase inhibitor plus exemestane with exemestane alone in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer that progressed on prior endocrine therapy: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Xu Liang, Jiang Weifan, Li Wenwei, Guo Chungen, Luo Lihua, Gao Yufeng, Cao Yali

机构信息

Prevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330009, P.R. China.

Department of Urinary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University School of Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jul 18;24(3):575. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11512. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Currently, endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Despite the high sensitivity of anti-estrogen therapy, many breast cancer patients still experience disease progression, relapse, and reduced overall survival (OS) because of endocrine resistance. Several underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon include a change in hormone receptor expression, mutations in ESR1 and modification of important signaling pathways, but thus far none of these can be defined as the complete explanation. Additionally, it has been shown that in some breast cancers, expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) can be repressed by epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone deacetylation, and this could be a mechanism for endocrine resistance. Interestingly, although the efficacy of the combination of histone deacetylase (HADC) inhibitors and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive ABC that progressed on prior endocrine therapy has been investigated in several studies, whether pharmacologic blocking of HDAC activity acts as a therapeutic strategy remains highly controversial. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an HDAC inhibitor plus exemestane vs. exemestane alone in this setting. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the combination group exhibited significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR)=0.776, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.675-0.892, P=0.000] and an improved objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.612, 95% CI=1.085-2.396, P=0.018) compared to those treated with exemestane alone. Additionally, in terms of OS, the combination group failed to achieve a significant clinical OS benefit (HR=0.811, 95% CI=0.596-1.104, P=0.183). Although grade 3/4 toxicities were more common in the combination group, those toxicities were mostly asymptomatic and manageable. In conclusion, the addition of an HDAC inhibitor to exemestane significantly improves PFS over exemestane alone in hormone receptor-positive ABC patients who progressed on previous endocrine therapy. Identification of novel biomarkers to select patients who will benefit from this combination strategy is a high priority.

摘要

目前,内分泌治疗是激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的标准治疗方法。尽管抗雌激素治疗具有较高的敏感性,但由于内分泌抵抗,许多乳腺癌患者仍会出现疾病进展、复发以及总生存期(OS)缩短的情况。这种现象的几种潜在机制包括激素受体表达的改变、ESR1突变以及重要信号通路的改变,但到目前为止,这些都不能被定义为完整的解释。此外,研究表明,在某些乳腺癌中,雌激素受体(ER)的表达可被DNA甲基化和组蛋白去乙酰化等表观遗传修饰所抑制,这可能是内分泌抵抗的一种机制。有趣的是,尽管多项研究已经探讨了组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HADC)抑制剂与依西美坦联合使用对先前内分泌治疗进展的激素受体阳性ABC的疗效,但HDAC活性的药物阻断是否可作为一种治疗策略仍存在很大争议。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估在这种情况下,HDAC抑制剂加依西美坦与单独使用依西美坦相比的疗效和安全性。我们的荟萃分析表明,与单独使用依西美坦治疗的患者相比,联合治疗组的无进展生存期(PFS)显著延长[风险比(HR)=0.776,95%置信区间(CI)=0.675-0.892,P=0.000],客观缓解率(ORR)提高(RR=1.612,95%CI=1.085-2.396,P=0.018)。此外,就总生存期而言,联合治疗组未能实现显著的临床总生存期获益(HR=0.811,95%CI=0.596-1.104,P=0.183)。尽管3/4级毒性在联合治疗组中更为常见,但这些毒性大多无症状且可控制。总之,对于先前内分泌治疗进展的激素受体阳性ABC患者,在依西美坦基础上加用HDAC抑制剂比单独使用依西美坦能显著改善无进展生存期。确定可从这种联合策略中获益的患者的新型生物标志物是当务之急。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a44/9353490/4104e49c9622/etm-24-03-11512-g00.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验