• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初诊慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者从尼罗替尼选择性转换为伊马替尼的安全性和有效性

Safety and Efficacy of Elective Switch from Nilotinib to Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

作者信息

Ibrahim Ali, Moukalled Nour, Mahfouz Rami, El Cheikh Jean, Bazarbachi Ali, Abou Dalle Iman

机构信息

Hematology-Oncology Division, Internal Medicine Department, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA.

出版信息

Clin Hematol Int. 2022 May 12;4(1-2):30-34. doi: 10.1007/s44228-022-00001-x. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s44228-022-00001-x
PMID:35950205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9358791/
Abstract

The treatment of newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with nilotinib has resulted in a higher rate of major molecular (MMR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months compared to imatinib but at a higher cumulative cost and increased risk of serious adverse events. To maintain long-term efficacy and minimize both toxicity and costs, we aimed at evaluating in a prospective single-center trial the efficacy and safety of a response-directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib after 12 months in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase CML. Thirteen adult patients were enrolled. Twelve patients started on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Eleven patients completed one year of nilotinib and were switched to imatinib 400 mg daily as per protocol. At 3 months, all patients achieved a complete hematologic response, with 7 (58%) patients had early molecular response. At 12 months, all patients achieved CCyR, of whom 5 (42%) and 4 (33%) patients achieved MMR and MR4.5, respectively. Three (27%) patients switched back to nilotinib after 18, 24, and 51 months respectively: 1 patient because of loss of CCyR after 18 months, and 2 patients because of imatinib intolerance. At last follow-up, all patients ( = 12) were alive and in MMR, 6 (50%) of them in continuous MR4.5. These findings suggest that response directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib at 12 months is capable of maintaining long-term response, with manageable side effects. This approach warrants further exploration with larger prospective trials. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01316250, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT01316250&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=. .

摘要

与伊马替尼相比,用尼罗替尼治疗新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病(CML)在12个月时主要分子反应(MMR)和完全细胞遗传学缓解(CCyR)率更高,但累积成本更高且严重不良事件风险增加。为了维持长期疗效并将毒性和成本降至最低,我们旨在通过一项前瞻性单中心试验评估新诊断的慢性期CML患者在12个月后从尼罗替尼转为伊马替尼的反应导向转换的疗效和安全性。招募了13名成年患者。12名患者开始每日两次服用300mg尼罗替尼。11名患者完成了一年的尼罗替尼治疗,并按照方案改为每日服用400mg伊马替尼。在3个月时,所有患者均达到完全血液学缓解,其中7名(58%)患者有早期分子反应。在12个月时,所有患者均达到CCyR,其中5名(42%)和4名(33%)患者分别达到MMR和MR4.5。3名(27%)患者分别在18、24和51个月后转回尼罗替尼:1名患者是因为18个月后失去CCyR,2名患者是因为伊马替尼不耐受。在最后一次随访时,所有患者(n = 12)均存活且处于MMR状态,其中6名(50%)处于持续MR4.5状态。这些发现表明,在12个月时从尼罗替尼转为伊马替尼的反应导向转换能够维持长期反应,且副作用可控。这种方法值得通过更大规模的前瞻性试验进一步探索。临床试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01316250,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT01316250&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=. .

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/9358791/fab237505ec1/44228_2022_1_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/9358791/fab237505ec1/44228_2022_1_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72d1/9358791/fab237505ec1/44228_2022_1_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Elective Switch from Nilotinib to Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.初诊慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者从尼罗替尼选择性转换为伊马替尼的安全性和有效性
Clin Hematol Int. 2022 May 12;4(1-2):30-34. doi: 10.1007/s44228-022-00001-x. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Dasatinib, nilotinib and standard-dose imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia: systematic reviews and economic analyses.达沙替尼、尼洛替尼和标准剂量伊马替尼一线治疗慢性髓性白血病:系统评价和经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(42):iii-iv, 1-277. doi: 10.3310/hta16420.
3
Feasibility Study of Switching to Nilotinib After First-line Imatinib in the Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.一线伊马替尼治疗慢性期慢性髓性白血病后改用尼洛替尼的可行性研究。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 Feb;20(2):e43-e49. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
4
Safety and efficacy of nilotinib in routine clinical practice in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase with resistance or intolerance to imatinib: results from the NOVEL study.尼罗替尼在对伊马替尼耐药或不耐受的慢性期或加速期慢性髓性白血病患者常规临床实践中的安全性和有效性:来自NOVEL研究的结果
Ther Adv Hematol. 2018 Mar;9(3):65-78. doi: 10.1177/2040620718756603. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
5
Switching to nilotinib versus imatinib dose escalation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response to imatinib (LASOR): a randomised, open-label trial.慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者对伊马替尼反应欠佳时,换用尼罗替尼与伊马替尼剂量递增的比较(LASOR):一项随机、开放标签试验
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Dec;3(12):e581-e591. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30167-3.
6
Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial.尼洛替尼与伊马替尼治疗新诊断的费城染色体阳性慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者:3 期随机 ENESTnd 试验的 24 个月最小随访。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):841-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70201-7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
7
Exploratory study on the impact of switching to nilotinib in 18 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response to imatinib.对18例对伊马替尼反应欠佳的慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者换用尼洛替尼的影响的探索性研究。
Ther Adv Hematol. 2017 Jan;8(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/2040620716678118. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
8
[Clinical Efficacy of Dasatinib, Nilotinib and Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Three-year Retrospective Analysis].达沙替尼、尼洛替尼和伊马替尼治疗新诊断慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者的临床疗效:一项三年回顾性分析
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;23(2):356-63. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2015.02.012.
9
[The clinical analysis of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib therapies for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase].一线尼罗替尼与伊马替尼治疗新诊断慢性期慢性髓性白血病的临床分析
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 1;56(11):810-815. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.11.007.
10
Phase 2 study of nilotinib in pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia.尼洛替尼治疗费城染色体阳性慢性髓性白血病患儿的 2 期研究。
Blood. 2019 Dec 5;134(23):2036-2045. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000069.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pragmatic Approach to Managing Long-Term Adverse Effects in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment.慢性髓性白血病治疗中长期不良反应管理的实用方法。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2023 Aug;18(4):98-104. doi: 10.1007/s11899-023-00698-4. Epub 2023 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
First-generation vs second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors: which is best at diagnosis of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia?第一代与第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂:哪一种在慢性期慢性髓性白血病的诊断中最佳?
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020 Dec 4;2020(1):228-236. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2020000108.
2
Early BCR-ABL1 kinetics are predictive of subsequent achievement of treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia.早期 BCR-ABL1 动力学可预测慢性髓性白血病后续无治疗缓解的获得。
Blood. 2021 Mar 4;137(9):1196-1207. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005514.
3
Dasatinib vs. imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who have not achieved an optimal response to 3 months of imatinib therapy: the DASCERN randomized study.
达沙替尼与伊马替尼治疗未能达到 3 个月伊马替尼治疗最佳反应的慢性髓性白血病慢性期(CML-CP)患者:DASCERN 随机研究。
Leukemia. 2020 Aug;34(8):2064-2073. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0805-1. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
4
European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia.欧洲白血病网络 2020 年治疗慢性髓性白血病的建议。
Leukemia. 2020 Apr;34(4):966-984. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for CML with incorporation of treatment discontinuation.纳入停药策略的 CML 治疗方案的成本效益分析。
Blood Adv. 2019 Nov 12;3(21):3266-3277. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000745.
6
Efficacy and safety of generic imatinib after switching from original imatinib in patients treated for chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States.美国接受治疗的慢性髓性白血病患者从原研伊马替尼换用通用伊马替尼的疗效和安全性。
Cancer Med. 2019 Nov;8(15):6559-6565. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2545. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following an Elective Switch From Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor to Imatinib.新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者从第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂择期转换为伊马替尼后的结局
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Dec;17(12):e71-e73. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.伊马替尼治疗慢性髓性白血病的长期疗效
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):917-927. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609324.
9
Switching to nilotinib versus imatinib dose escalation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response to imatinib (LASOR): a randomised, open-label trial.慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者对伊马替尼反应欠佳时,换用尼罗替尼与伊马替尼剂量递增的比较(LASOR):一项随机、开放标签试验
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Dec;3(12):e581-e591. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30167-3.
10
Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial.一线尼罗替尼与伊马替尼治疗慢性期慢性髓性白血病的长期获益与风险:随机ENESTnd试验的5年更新
Leukemia. 2016 May;30(5):1044-54. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.5. Epub 2016 Feb 3.