University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Groupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 1;316:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.069. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Misdiagnosis of bipolar I disorder (BP-I) as major depressive disorder (MDD) is common. This study evaluated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among BP-I patients who were initially misdiagnosed with MDD (misdiagnosed BP-I cohort) versus patients diagnosed with BP-I without a known prior MDD diagnosis (BP-I only cohort).
Data from IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases were used. The index date was the first MDD diagnosis for misdiagnosed patients or first BP-I diagnosis for BP-I only patients. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. All-cause and mental health (MH)-related HRU and costs were compared between weighted cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) and mean cost differences, respectively. Outcomes were reported per patient-year (PPY). Confidence intervals and P-values were calculated using non-parametric bootstrap procedures.
Overall, 14,729 misdiagnosed BP-I and 16,072 BP-I only patients met criteria. Baseline characteristics were balanced across weighted cohorts. Misdiagnosed BP-I patients had significantly higher rates of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and outpatient visits than BP-I only patients during follow-up (all-cause RRs: 1.94, 1.33, and 1.38, respectively, all P < .001; MH-related RRs: 2.19, 1.77, and 1.77, respectively, all P < .001). Similarly, misdiagnosed BP-I patients incurred significantly higher total healthcare costs PPY over follow-up (all-cause: $21,202 vs $14,661, cost difference = $6541; MH-related: $12,901 vs $6749, cost difference = $6152; both P < .001). Cost differences were even higher during the first year (all-cause = $7146; MH-related = $6619; both P < .001).
Claims database (e.g., coding inaccuracies); generalizability to uninsured patients.
The prompt and correct diagnosis of BP-I may significantly reduce HRU and costs.
将双相 I 障碍(BP-I)误诊为重度抑郁症(MDD)较为常见。本研究评估了初始误诊为 MDD 的 BP-I 患者(误诊 BP-I 队列)与未明确既往 MDD 诊断的仅诊断为 BP-I 患者(仅 BP-I 队列)的医疗资源利用(HRU)和成本。
使用 IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases 中的数据。索引日期为误诊患者的首次 MDD 诊断或仅 BP-I 患者的首次 BP-I 诊断。使用逆概率治疗加权法平衡队列间的基线特征。使用率比值(RR)和平均费用差异分别比较加权队列之间的全因和心理健康(MH)相关 HRU 和费用。结果以每患者年(PPY)报告。使用非参数自举程序计算置信区间和 P 值。
总体而言,有 14729 名误诊 BP-I 和 16072 名仅 BP-I 患者符合标准。加权队列之间的基线特征平衡。在随访期间,误诊 BP-I 患者的住院、急诊就诊和门诊就诊率明显高于仅 BP-I 患者(全因 RR:分别为 1.94、1.33 和 1.38,均 P<0.001;MH 相关 RR:分别为 2.19、1.77 和 1.77,均 P<0.001)。同样,误诊 BP-I 患者在整个随访期间的总医疗保健费用 PPY 显著更高(全因:$21202 与$14661,费用差异=$6541;MH 相关:$12901 与$6749,费用差异=$6152;均 P<0.001)。第一年的费用差异甚至更高(全因:$7146;MH 相关:$6619;均 P<0.001)。
索赔数据库(例如,编码不准确);是否适用于未参保患者。
及时正确诊断 BP-I 可能会显著降低 HRU 和成本。