• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经至少 2 年随访的成人脊柱畸形患者行经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术矫正腰椎前凸

Lumbar Lordosis Correction With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e295-e302. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.003
PMID:35953034
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree of lumbar lordosis (LL) correction possible via transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in adult spinal deformity patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients ≥18 years of age with severe positive sagittal balance defined by the SRS-Schwab classification: pelvic incidence to LL mismatch >20°, sagittal vertical axis >9.5cm, and/or pelvic tilt >30°. All patients had surgery between 2013 to 2018 with a TLIF at L4-L5 and/or L5-S1 by the senior author (J.L.F.) with ≥2-years follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (18 men, 43 women) with 85 TLIFs were included with an average age of 66 years and average follow-up of 50 months. Average lumbar lordosis (L1-S1) improved from 27° preoperative to 48° postoperative and 45° at 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001). Average segmental lordosis at L4-L5 TLIF sites improved from 3° preoperative to 13° postoperative and persisted at 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis at L5-S1 TLIF sites improved from 7° preoperative to 21° postoperative and 20° at 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001). Seventeen of the TLIFs (20%) had >20° of segmental lordosis improvement at long-term follow-up. The rate of revision surgery for pseudoarthrosis at the TLIF level was 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant lordosis correction can be achieved through an open TLIF in patients with severe positive sagittal balance when utilizing meticulous deformity correction techniques, avoiding the added morbidity of an anterior approach or a 3-column osteotomy.

摘要

目的

确定经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗成人脊柱畸形患者腰椎前凸(LL)矫正的程度。

方法

回顾性图表分析确定了年龄≥18 岁的严重正性矢状面平衡患者,SRS-Schwab 分类定义为:骨盆入射角与 LL 不匹配>20°,矢状垂直轴>9.5cm,和/或骨盆倾斜>30°。所有患者均由资深作者(J.L.F.)于 2013 年至 2018 年期间接受了 TLIF 手术,L4-L5 和/或 L5-S1 进行手术,随访时间≥2 年。

结果

共纳入 61 例(18 例男性,43 例女性)85 例 TLIF 手术患者,平均年龄 66 岁,平均随访时间 50 个月。腰椎前凸(L1-S1)平均从术前的 27°改善到术后的 48°,术后 2 年随访时为 45°(P<0.001)。L4-L5 TLIF 部位的平均节段性前凸从术前的 3°改善到术后的 13°,并在术后 2 年随访时保持(P<0.001)。L5-S1 TLIF 部位的节段性前凸从术前的 7°改善到术后的 21°,术后 2 年随访时为 20°(P<0.001)。17 例 TLIF(20%)在长期随访中有>20°的节段性前凸改善。TLIF 水平假关节的翻修手术率为 5%。

结论

当采用精细的畸形矫正技术时,通过开放 TLIF 可以在严重正性矢状面平衡的患者中获得显著的前凸矫正,避免了前路或三柱截骨术的额外发病率。

相似文献

1
Lumbar Lordosis Correction With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.经至少 2 年随访的成人脊柱畸形患者行经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术矫正腰椎前凸
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e295-e302. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.多中心评估经椎间孔与前路腰椎体间融合术治疗节段性脊柱侧凸的疗效和并发症。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Aug 20;35(6):729-742. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201915. Print 2021 Dec 1.
3
Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.胸腰段冠状面弯曲顶点多级外侧椎间融合术在成人脊柱畸形手术中联合开放后路内固定及L5-S1椎间融合的效用:32例病例匹配评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):208-219. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151543. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
4
Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.术前年龄调整矢状失平衡对退行性腰椎滑脱症单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后影像学和临床结果的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Aug 2;41(4):489-497. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23737. Print 2024 Oct 1.
5
What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?在 L4-5 行侧路与经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后,L3-4 和 L5-S1 相邻节段的矢状位曲度补偿的早期命运如何?
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3503-3508. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08384-6. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
6
Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis.长节段畸形矫形中经椎间孔与前路腰椎椎间融合术的匹配队列分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):E755-62. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828d6ca3.
7
Restoring L4-S1 Lordosis Shape in Severe Sagittal Deformity: Impact of Correction Techniques on Alignment and Complication Profile.恢复严重矢状面畸形中的 L4-S1 前凸形态:矫正技术对矢状面排列和并发症的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;189:e219-e229. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.021. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
8
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
9
Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.成人脊柱畸形伴轻至中度矢状面失衡的三种手术策略的比较分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):40-49. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161370. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.后路入路和腰椎节段对退行性腰椎病变节段、邻近节段和矢状面排列的影响:术后 6 个月的影像学分析。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1318-1324. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes.腰椎椎体截骨术:技术与结果
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jul 6;19:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100516. eCollection 2024 Sep.