The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Department of Otolaryngology, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, H91YR71, Republic of Ireland.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec;407(8):3209-3219. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02651-0. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a feared complication of thyroid surgery occurring in 1-5% of cases. The present approaches to RLN preservation include RLN visualization with no nerve monitoring (No-NM), intermittent intra-operative nerve monitoring (I-IONM) and continuous intra-operative nerve monitoring (C-IONM). There is ambiguity as to which of these strategies should be the preferred method of RLN preservation.
A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Collaboration databases was undertaken with network meta-analysis (NMA) performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A Bayesian NMA was conducted using R packages netmeta with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Only prospective studies were included.
Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 22,080 patients and 40,642 nerves at risk (NAR). Overall, 23,364 NARs (57.5%) underwent I-IONM, 17,176 (42.3%) No-NM and 98 (0.2%) underwent C-IONM. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery (I-IONM vs.No-NM, OR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.55-1.19; C-IONM vs. No-NM, OR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.02-5.00). Pooled analysis showed that IONM (I-IONM or C-IONM) demonstrated a protective effect versus No-NM in reducing the incidence of transient RLN injury (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, p = 0.03).
IONM strategies did not significantly reduce the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery. However, the small number of C-IONM NARs limits conclusions that may be drawn. Further well-designed prospective studies will be required to definitively assess the utility of C-IONM.
喉返神经(RLN)损伤是甲状腺手术中令人恐惧的并发症,其发生率为 1-5%。目前保留 RLN 的方法包括 RLN 可视化但不进行神经监测(无神经监测,No-NM)、术中间歇性神经监测(I-IONM)和连续术中神经监测(C-IONM)。对于这些策略中哪一种应该是 RLN 保护的首选方法,存在着不确定性。
对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 协作数据库进行系统回顾,并根据 PRISMA 和 Cochrane 协作指南进行网络荟萃分析(NMA)。使用 R 包 netmeta 进行贝叶斯 NMA,结果表示为比值比(OR)和 95%可信区间(CrI)。仅纳入前瞻性研究。
18 项研究符合纳入标准,包括 22080 例患者和 40642 根风险神经(NAR)。总体而言,23364 根 NAR(57.5%)接受了 I-IONM,17176 根(42.3%)接受了 No-NM,98 根(0.2%)接受了 C-IONM。在甲状腺手术后 RLN 永久性损伤的发生率方面,各组之间没有显著差异(I-IONM 与 No-NM,OR 0.84,95% CrI 0.55-1.19;C-IONM 与 No-NM,OR 0.44,95% CrI 0.02-5.00)。汇总分析显示,与 No-NM 相比,IONM(I-IONM 或 C-IONM)在降低暂时性 RLN 损伤的发生率方面具有保护作用(OR 0.75,95%CI 0.59-0.97,p=0.03)。
IONM 策略并未显著降低甲状腺手术后 RLN 永久性损伤的发生率。然而,C-IONM NAR 的数量较少限制了可能得出的结论。需要进一步设计良好的前瞻性研究来明确评估 C-IONM 的效用。