MacNicol Jennifer L, Renwick Simone, Ganobis Caroline M, Allen-Vercoe Emma, Weese Jeffery Scott, Pearson Wendy
Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;12(15):2009. doi: 10.3390/ani12152009.
The equine gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota is intimately related to the horse. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the microbiome and metabolome of cecal inoculum maintained in an anaerobic chamber or chemostat batch fermenter, as well as the fecal slurry maintained in an anaerobic chamber over 48 h. Cecal and fecal content were collected from healthy adult horses immediately upon death. Cecal fluid was used to inoculate chemostat vessels (chemostat cecal, = 11) and vessels containing cecal fluid (anaerobic cecal, = 15) or 5% fecal slurry (anaerobic fecal, = 6) were maintained in an anaerobic chamber. Sampling for microbiome and metabolome analysis was performed at vessel establishment (0 h), and after 24 h and 48 h of fermentation. Illumina sequencing was performed, and metabolites were identified via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Alpha and beta diversity indices, as well as individual metabolite concentrations and metabolite regression equations, were analyzed and compared between groups and over time. No differences were evident between alpha or beta diversity in cecal fluid maintained in either an anaerobic chamber or chemostat. The microbiome of the fecal inoculum maintained anaerobically shifted over 48 h and was not comparable to that of the cecal inoculum. Metabolite concentrations were consistently highest in chemostat vessels and lowest in anaerobic fecal vessels. Interestingly, the rate of metabolite change in anaerobic cecal and chemostat cecal vessels was comparable. In conclusion, maintaining an equine cecal inoculum in either an anaerobic chamber or chemostat vessel for 48 h is comparable in terms of the microbiome. However, the microbiome and metabolome of fecal material is not comparable with a cecal inoculum. Future research is required to better understand the factors that influence the level of microbial activity in vitro, particularly when microbiome data identify analogous communities.
马的胃肠道(GI)微生物群与马密切相关。本研究的目的是评估在厌氧箱或恒化器分批发酵罐中维持的盲肠接种物的微生物组和代谢组,以及在厌氧箱中维持48小时的粪便悬液的微生物组和代谢组。从健康成年马死亡后立即采集盲肠和粪便内容物。盲肠液用于接种恒化器容器(恒化器盲肠,n = 11),含有盲肠液的容器(厌氧盲肠,n = 15)或5%粪便悬液(厌氧粪便,n = 6)在厌氧箱中维持。在容器建立时(0小时)以及发酵24小时和48小时后进行微生物组和代谢组分析的采样。进行了Illumina测序,并通过核磁共振(NMR)鉴定代谢物。分析并比较了组间和随时间的α和β多样性指数,以及个体代谢物浓度和代谢物回归方程。在厌氧箱或恒化器中维持的盲肠液的α或β多样性之间没有明显差异。厌氧维持的粪便接种物的微生物组在48小时内发生了变化,与盲肠接种物的微生物组不可比。代谢物浓度在恒化器容器中始终最高,在厌氧粪便容器中最低。有趣的是,厌氧盲肠和恒化器盲肠容器中代谢物的变化率相当。总之,就微生物组而言,将马的盲肠接种物在厌氧箱或恒化器容器中维持48小时是相当的。然而,粪便物质的微生物组和代谢组与盲肠接种物不可比。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解影响体外微生物活性水平的因素,特别是当微生物组数据识别出类似群落时。