• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你吃什么就像你是什么样的人,我们的星球也是如此:基于个性和环保主义来识别饮食群体。

You Are What You Eat and So Is Our Planet: Identifying Dietary Groups Based on Personality and Environmentalism.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Medical School Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159354.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159354
PMID:35954710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9367778/
Abstract

Behavioral change interventions promoting the reduction of animal product consumption are valuable tools to improve ecological sustainability as well as public health and help the mitigation of climate change. Recent findings revealed improved efficacy of interventions targeted at barriers (e.g., self-efficacy) of three different types of meat consumers over non-targeted interventions (e.g., completion of unrelated surveys). However, such interventions have yet to factor in the role of individual differences in personality. Therefore, in a first step, we performed segmentation analysis on barriers and benefits of reducing animal product consumption (e.g., meat attachment, environmentalism) with the inclusion of personality. In an online sample of N=1135 participants, latent profile analysis revealed five distinct dietary groups: "plant-based eaters", "meat-reducers", "medium-hindrance meat eaters", "medium strong-hindrance meat eaters, and "strong-hindrance meat eaters", based on inhibitors and facilitators of meat reduction. Groups differed in terms of consumption of different animal products (η2=0.08 to η2=0.80) as well as the Big Five (η2=0.08 to η2=0.80) and Dark Triad (η2=0.08 to η2=0.80). Strong-hindrance meat eaters were characterized by low Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Openness as well as high dark trait expression, implying new targets for future intervention design.

摘要

促进减少动物产品消费的行为改变干预措施是改善生态可持续性以及公共健康和帮助缓解气候变化的有价值的工具。最近的研究结果表明,针对三种不同类型的肉类消费者的干预措施(例如,自我效能感)比非针对性干预措施(例如,完成不相关的调查)更有效。然而,这些干预措施尚未考虑到个性差异的作用。因此,我们首先在包括个性的情况下,对减少动物产品消费的障碍和益处(例如,肉类依恋、环保主义)进行了细分分析。在一个包含 N=1135 名参与者的在线样本中,潜在剖面分析根据减少肉类的抑制剂和促进剂揭示了五个不同的饮食群体:“纯素食者”、“肉类减少者”、“中等障碍肉类食用者”、“中等强障碍肉类食用者”和“强障碍肉类食用者”。这些群体在不同动物产品的消费方面存在差异(η2=0.08 到 η2=0.80),以及大五人格(η2=0.08 到 η2=0.80)和黑暗三人格(η2=0.08 到 η2=0.80)。强障碍肉类食用者的特点是责任心、宜人性和开放性较低,以及黑暗特质表达较高,这意味着未来干预设计的新目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/9367778/02c83af4e843/ijerph-19-09354-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/9367778/0b2920aa5581/ijerph-19-09354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/9367778/9c6cce46b4cd/ijerph-19-09354-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/9367778/02c83af4e843/ijerph-19-09354-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/9367778/0b2920aa5581/ijerph-19-09354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/9367778/9c6cce46b4cd/ijerph-19-09354-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/9367778/02c83af4e843/ijerph-19-09354-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
You Are What You Eat and So Is Our Planet: Identifying Dietary Groups Based on Personality and Environmentalism.你吃什么就像你是什么样的人,我们的星球也是如此:基于个性和环保主义来识别饮食群体。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159354.
2
Reducing meat consumption: Identifying group-specific inhibitors using latent profile analysis.减少肉类消费:使用潜在剖面分析识别特定群体的抑制剂。
Appetite. 2019 Jul 1;138:233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
3
Comparing meat abstainers with avid meat eaters and committed meat reducers.将肉食戒绝者与热衷肉食者及坚定的肉食减少者进行比较。
Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 10;9:1016858. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1016858. eCollection 2022.
4
Committed vs. uncommitted meat eaters: Understanding willingness to change protein consumption.坚定的肉食者与不坚定的肉食者:了解改变蛋白质摄入的意愿。
Appetite. 2019 Jul 1;138:115-126. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
5
Examining the "Veggie" personality: Results from a representative German sample.考察“素食者”人格:来自代表性德国样本的结果。
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:246-255. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
6
Does personality influence eating styles and food choices? Direct and indirect effects.人格会影响饮食方式和食物选择吗?直接和间接的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Jan;84:128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
7
Personality and eating habits revisited: Associations between the big five, food choices, and Body Mass Index in a representative Australian sample.人格与饮食习惯再探讨:在澳大利亚代表性样本中,大五人格、食物选择与身体质量指数的关联。
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104607. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104607. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Replacing meat with alternative plant-based products (RE-MAP): a randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent behavioral intervention to reduce meat consumption.用替代植物性产品替代肉类(RE-MAP):一项减少肉类消费的多成分行为干预的随机对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 May 1;115(5):1357-1366. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab414.
9
Less Animal-Based Food, Better Weight Status: Associations of the Restriction of Animal-Based Product Intake with Body-Mass-Index, Depressive Symptoms and Personality in the General Population.少吃动物性食物,体重状况更佳:限制动物性食品摄入与普通人群体重指数、抑郁症状和人格的关系。
Nutrients. 2020 May 20;12(5):1492. doi: 10.3390/nu12051492.
10
Towards a reduced meat diet: Mindset and motivation of young vegetarians, low, medium and high meat-eaters.迈向减少肉类饮食:年轻素食者、低、中、高肉类消费者的心态与动机。
Appetite. 2017 Jun 1;113:387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Forty-five years of research on vegetarianism and veganism: A systematic and comprehensive literature review of quantitative studies.45年素食主义和纯素食主义研究:定量研究的系统全面文献综述
Heliyon. 2023 May 9;9(5):e16091. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16091. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Lighten the darkness: Personality interventions targeting agreeableness also reduce participants' levels of the dark triad.点亮黑暗:针对宜人性的人格干预也会降低参与者的黑暗三人格水平。
J Pers. 2023 Aug;91(4):901-916. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12714. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Meat disgust is negatively associated with meat intake - Evidence from a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.厌恶肉类与肉类摄入量呈负相关——来自横断面和纵向研究的证据。
Appetite. 2021 Sep 1;164:105299. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105299. Epub 2021 May 6.
3
The Dark Triad of Personality in the Context of Health Behaviors: Ally or Enemy?
健康行为背景下的黑暗人格三合一:盟友还是敌人?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;18(8):4113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084113.
4
The multidimensional nature of food neophobia.食物恐惧的多维性。
Appetite. 2021 Jul 1;162:105177. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105177. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
Big Five facets' associations with pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors.五大因素与环保态度和行为的关系。
J Pers. 2021 Apr;89(2):203-215. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12576. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
6
Personality and eating habits revisited: Associations between the big five, food choices, and Body Mass Index in a representative Australian sample.人格与饮食习惯再探讨:在澳大利亚代表性样本中,大五人格、食物选择与身体质量指数的关联。
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104607. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104607. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
The future of health behaviour change interventions: opportunities for open science and personality research.健康行为改变干预的未来:开放科学与人格研究的机遇
Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;14(1):176-181. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1707107. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
8
Valuing humans over animals - Gender differences in meat-eating behavior and the role of the Dark Triad.重视人类胜过动物——肉食行为的性别差异与黑暗人格三联征的作用。
Appetite. 2020 Mar 1;146:104516. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104516. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods.食物对健康和环境的多重影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23357-23362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906908116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change.随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以测试促进家庭采取行动应对气候变化的行为干预措施。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4545. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2.